A world
renowned MISA expert performed a comparative analysis of the ways MISA and the
ATMAN yoga federation operates in brainwashing their students. In this study
the different aspects of the consistent indoctrination and manipulation of
these yoga schools will be compared to the ways genuine spiritual traditions
work so it becomes obvious where this organisation violates the free will of
their students and keeps them trapped in a world of illusions and abuses.
It is of immense use to attentive, lucid, intelligent, full of common-sense and
endowed with spiritual intuition aspirants because this comparative analysis
helps them to discover the fraud at ATMAN and MISA.
The text here has been translated from
Romanian as it appeared on exmisa.blogspot.com
About DOUBTS and SPIRITUAL TESTS at MISA
The two German journalists who made the recent "Toxic Tantra" podcast noticed that one of the methods of psychological control widely used within the MISA sect involves the so-called SPIRITUAL TESTS.
I quote from the podcast:
Therapist : It still amazes me how intelligence is undermined in this way. In other words, the fact that people who actually have discernment and intelligence, end up in a situation where they are somehow lost.
narrator : It's as if these smart women have turned the common sense switch to "OFF" for the duration of their participation at the yoga school. "Why didn't they just say NO?" The psychotherapist says it can happen to anyone.
Therapist : If you're wondering about that, then the doubts and resentments have always been there, and the awareness of what it's not okay is then denied, because the attraction is greater and because there are always arguments that nullify the doubts.
Those who were students of this "school" obviously had some doubts about the "spiritual guide" and felt how they it manifests itself. Some accepted them and immediately left the sect, while others struggled with them for a while (doubted their doubts).
Obviously, those who are students of MISA/ATMAN still suppress any doubts they may have.
One of the insidious mechanisms for repressing doubts in followers is the "fear of demonic doubts" and the fact that they can divert them from the spiritual path and make them " definitely miss the only chance for salvation ".
The danger of "demonic doubts" is a true psychological blackmail, which disqualifies the MISA leader as an authentic spiritual master because, stating that the followers' doubts about him as a guide and about the activities and actions of the school are "demonic", i.e. they are induced by demons and represent resonances with demons, he implicitly asserts that he and his school are infallible and divine, and the mere appearance of doubt itself is a deadly danger and a grave signal of a possible descent into hell.
Of course, doubts on a spiritual path are an undermining of spiritual efforts because they produce an inner division but on the other hand, they are natural as long as the practitioner has not reached a high level of consciousness and clairvoyance which will allow him to be aware of the truth and to discern from the start any situations.
In the absence of a higher consciousness, the opposite of doubt is blind trust , and this is as dangerous as doubt itself .
Blind trust in an authentic master excludes true faith based on love and communion, while blind trust in a false master leads to serious and irremediable error (see here đ đ ).
A true master knows that doubt is something natural and inevitable on the spiritual path, and will never act on it of repression or, on the contrary, of the amplification of the conflict within the aspirant.
Instead, a false master, like Bivolaru, will seek to avoid or suppress "from the front" the appearance of any doubt regarding him:
Bivolaru , message for students:
Certain demonic doubts, persistent and strong, first dim and then make the mysterious state disappear forever of paranormal, ineffable communion with the SPIRITUAL GUIDE (written in capital letters, na) đ
Bivolaru , message regarding the leaving of the course by some instructors from BraÈov:
When some aspirants lose faith in the spirit guide, their vision of the spirit guide darkens and changes, and that is precisely why they can no longer benefit shortly thereafter from the gifts and spiritual support that the spiritual guide offers them incessantly. In such situations, some bizarre, even demonic influences appear in their being, which causes them to modify themselves the vision or in other words the point of view. đ
Of course, doubt can SOMETIMES lead to wandering and leaving the spiritual path, but it is still a naturally occurring situation (that is, it does not arise from the will of one touched by doubt) and is inevitable on a spiritual path, while its opposite - blind trust - it is always unnatural (it is the fanatic's choice), it is false, and it ALWAYS leads to spiritual error. So it is a great spiritual error to combat doubt with fear and inoculation of blind faith, as is done at MISA.
Christian practice recommends combating doubt through prayer, that is, by invoking divine support ("strengthening"), through which a high spiritual experience arises that brings more faith and weakens doubt.
Tantra, on the other hand, simply recommends CAREFUL and DETACHED observation of how doubt manifests itself in the inner universe of the practitioner.
It is noted that both attitudes primarily AVOID ENGAGEMENT and IDENTIFICATION of the subject with his doubt.
The practitioner is in reality the SPIRIT, the SELF, and is not identical with his thoughts or doubt.
An intelligent practitioner realizes that DOUBT APPEARS TO HIM , it comes from outside, so HE IS NOT IDENTICAL to his DOUBT.
When the practitioner identifies with the doubt that arises, a conflict arises within him that divides and undermines him within.
By fighting his own doubt - as the MISA guide foolishly suggests - the practitioner is fighting with himself, defeat being very likely.
Besides, Bivolaru always said that "what you fear, that's why you don't escape" but here he is, once again, contradicting himself.
In reality, the fear of doubt fuels and amplifies it because the subject is constantly thinking about it.
The 17 Unsuspected Dangers of Demonic Doubts - a special message from GRIEG:
The demonic doubts that we first accept and then begin to feed unconsciously, causing them to grow, after that they start to torment us and often make our existence become a sui generis hell (precisely due to the resonances occult infernals that it triggers). đ
Demonic doubts then cause us to distrust certain divine revelations or cause us to reject in an aberrant way and with great vehemence important spiritual truths. đ
If, from the very beginning, demonic doubts are not accepted, it is no longer possible for them to ever even have and the least effect on us. đ
Notice how much idiocy - and at the same time sectarianism - these passages contain!
That is, to someone tormented by doubt, Bivolaru advises him not to accept it, to fight against it!
The respective being already divided by doubt, will put under the sign of doubt including the recommendation to reject it, coming from the very one he already doubts, which will amplify even more the conflict, therefore the doubt!
This is how the head of the great tantric and sage Bivolaru leads, to hit his left with his right.
But neither Christian prayer nor "tantric lucid and detached observation" necessarily solves the problem.
If that doubt is indeed demon-induced - which means it is false and aims to divert the aspirant from a right path - then it will disappear after a while both through prayer and through careful and detached observation, which will cause the sublimation and disappearance of that low impulsive energy.
But if the doubt is justified , that is, it is produced by a REAL CONTRADICTION between word and deed or between words and reality? In this case the conflict has real bases and it will not disappear even through prayer - because God it will not suppress the truth - nor by higher awareness, for there manifests a reality that does not dissolve through observation!
To counteract the persistence of a justified doubt , which cannot be rejected, the fox Bivolaru invented another concept:
SPIRITUAL TESTS .
Bivolaru : Often, the demonic doubts that the evil influences that we accept cause in our being, they then draw after them the appearance of certain spiritual tests or trials, to which we are subjected shortly afterwards. đ
Bivolaru , message regarding the leaving of the course by some instructors from BraÈov:
Every human being who sets out on a spiritual path will be faced with certain spiritual trials.
This is an iron law of spiritual evolution. No one escapes spiritual trials. Remember in this direction the case of Jesus Christ who even faced certain spiritual trials that are described in the Bible.
So if even Jesus did not escape spiritual trials, no one ever escapes them. đ
Note : In the Bible it is clearly said that God did not put Jesus to the test, but allowed him to be tempted (Matthew 4:1) đ :
1. Then Jesus was led by the Spirit into the desert to be tempted by the devil.
God allows temptation to come , because it is something natural and inevitable, but it is not HE who tempts, but the devil!
This fact is reinforced in the Sobornic Epistle of the Holy Apostle James (1:13,14):
13. Let no one say, when he is tempted: I am tempted by God, because God is not tempted by evil and He himself tempts no one .
14. But each one is tempted when he is drawn and enticed by his own lust . đ
The idea that God intentionally puts man to the test, therefore tempts him, appears to be foolish in several respects:
➤ from God's position as Omniscient, the very idea of "test" or "trial" is nonsense since HE knows the future in advance, with CERTAINTY and knows the value of man.
➤ to test or try an unprepared man would be an immense wickedness.
Failure being certain in this case, to subject a man to a test which it is clear in advance that he will fail is like deliberately pushing him in the abyss, it is a spiritual crime!
On the other hand, however, man is endowed with free will and thus, inevitably, ends up being faced with many moments in which he has a choice of several possibilities,
Therefore, when it is stated that "the spiritual test appears as a result of a divine necessity", it should not be understood in the sense that God He Himself subjects people to spiritual tests, but that these tests are inherent in the existence of free will, without being imposed.
"Necessity", in the sense of "inevitability" comes from the freedom to choose!
Moreover, the possibilities from which man freely chooses are often opposite.
Opposing options must necessarily be present, for better or for worse, especially in moral choices because, otherwise, it would be about predestination or even programming.
If man has only "good choices" at his disposal, he has no merit in this, being like a train that inevitably arrives to the right destination, with no possibility of getting lost, or being like a well-programmed robot that does its job perfectly.
If man only has "bad choices" at his disposal, he has no responsibility, being forced like a slave.
So, depending on his free choices, man's existence leads him BY ITSELF to certain breakthroughs, that is, he tests himself!
Then after each choice, through the effects - good or bad - that he feels, man realizes for himself if he made a good choice. Thus he will acquire spiritual knowledge. God does not intervene unless His help is asked, and obviously only in Good. Man must be left to choose freely and learn for himself from the tests that ALONE reaches, this is the only natural way of evolution.
So God does not subject man to trials from HIS Will, nor is it necessary, because they arise anyway, from freedom of choice.
But the situations in which man has to make choices do not always arise naturally, they can also appear as a result of some interventions intentional, from the outside. It is obvious the case of "temptations" in which man is attracted or pushed by other entities, who follow to fulfill certain purposes.
God can allow man to be tested or tempted under certain conditions.
In this sense, it is often stated that " God does not give man more than he can carry ", an idea that has been supported even by Bivolaru in a conference in February 2023 đ .
Once again this idea is asserted that God does not subject man to a test that HE knows in advance that man will fail. God does not even need to put man to the test, because he knows him perfectly. And then, if God does not tempt or test from within, then who does?
Obviously, someone who does not work like God: the devil and his ilk!
Bivolaru , through his acolytes, introduced an innovation: "the test created by the Spiritual Guide!"
"Often the Spirit Guide himself subjects us to various tests for which he thinks we are ready." đ
Normally, "being prepared to undergo the spiritual test" can mean one of the following possibilities:
➤ " the disciple is prepared for the test " in the sense that " he will pass it easily or with certainty ", which in fact does not mean a test or trial, but a formal confirmation or validation, a certificate.
This kind of test can have the purpose of confirming and strengthening the disciple's skills and increasing his self-confidence.
➤ " the time has come for the disciple to be tested ", that is, the time has come to see if he is ready or able to pass at a higher stage of training or even evolution, for which, however, they must prove some strictly necessary attributes or skills (analogous to entrance, degree or license exams).
In this case, we cannot speak of validation but of VERIFICATION and, obviously, the test result is NOT KNOWN IN ADVANCE!
There is therefore the possibility that the disciple will fail the test, i.e. "it was time for the disciple to be tested" but the time did not come for him to move on to the next stage, for which he is not yet ready.
The first option is excluded if the disciples fail the tests.
So there remains the second option, VERIFICATION, which implies that the "Spiritual Guide" DOES NOT KNOW IN ADVANCE the result of the tests to which he subjects the disciples, because there are cases in which they "fail the tests", thereby proving that they are unprepared.
But this option is also excluded, because it is contradictory in itself!
The statement "The spiritual guide believes that we are ready" contradicts the fact that the disciples fail some tests!
So, in both situations, the statement "The spiritual guide believes that we are ready" is nonsense, from which it follows that The "Guide" has no way of knowing in advance whether the disciples are ready for the test or not, so there is always the possibility for them to fail the test without the "Guide" foreseeing this in advance, which is in logical agreement with the idea of "free will" of the disciple!
And then, if the "Guide" has no way of knowing with certainty the result of a test to which he subjects his disciples, how exactly does he come to CONSIDER that the disciples are ready for spiritual tests?
It is a serious question, because it raises the serious issue of a so-called "spiritual guide" who, WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT WILL BE NEXT, DELIBERATELY pushes a follower into a CRUCIAL test that they may not be ready for at the time and irresponsibly causes him to fall!
This is obviously the case of the so-called "tantric initiations" that the "guide" Bivolaru "offered" to some MISA/ATMAN students in Paris.
Two such former students ("Eva and Nathalie from the podcast "Soulcatcher - Toxic Tantra" đ ) reported that they left the ATMAN courses precisely following such shocking experiences they had with Bivolaru.
The shenanigans at MISA refer to these shocking events as "complex spiritual tests":
"The person named Eva had a story about an experience in 2007 and how she later decided to give up the spiritual path.
She is neither the first nor the last to quit. Spiritual tests are not inventions for journalists to scoff at.
They are real and occur in the lives of all spiritual seekers. Some pass them, others don't. When you are offered a lot, the tests are also more complex..." đ
Those at MISA failed the test of villainy and duplicity themselves, because they did not describe at all what these "complex tests" consisted of.
Since, following these "complex tests", these students left the "yoga school" or - as the MISA people say - ” abandoned the spiritual path and thus paved their way to hell ” đ , means that these complex tests were, in their opinion, CRUCIAL TESTS.
Then, since these students did not know in advance what was going to happen, they were invited to a meeting in Paris by the "guide" who only he knew what he was up to, it is about DELIBERATE CRUCIAL TESTS on the part of the "guide".
So, according to MISA, the two students failed the tests for which the "guide" considered them to be prepared (because he invited them specifically, without a request from them) but at the same time, according to MISA, they were not ready , since they fell!
The two trainees did not request "initiation" - they did not even know the "guide" - but were invited to meet him (" Do you want to meet the guru? How do you feel when you think about meeting your guru? ", it was written in the entry form to the Villa).
This again raises the question: how did he come to consider that the time had come for the two women to be "initiated", although in the end they showed that they were "not ready"?
How did he come to consider that the time has come for Ashleigh Freckleton or Roxana ChirilÄ to be invited to Paris to be "initiated", since they refused to take part in such a thing?
Was the affirmative answer to the question " do you want to meet the guru" enough? I quote:
Nathalie : "Do you want to meet the guru?" Exactly. The only answer that is okay is "YES, of course!"
Because if you check "NO", you will be kicked out immediately.
reporter : Is that what you were told?
Nathalie : No, we weren't told that, but it happened to a girl who was there with me. And that was exactly the point.
Then there is the question: "How do you feel when you think about meeting your guru?"
Things like this are specified: "so excited, happy, ecstatic", something like that. Only positive things.
You can't tick anything negative. Then, you also need to specify the periods of time in which you would have time to meet with him.
filmmaker : She doesn't really want to meet the guru, this old man with whom she still has no real connection, although she already meditated on him and wrote him a letter, but she wants to enter this Villa. And then?
Nathalie: Well, I checked "YES".
Is a simple affirmative answer from the students enough? It can be seen that no, since some "were not prepared, failing or refusing the test”. In fact, the "fall" was favored, if not actually caused, by the ambiguity of the question "do you want to meet the guru?"
This can be a simple meeting and discussion, but it can also be interpreted in a biblical sense, as Bivolaru did:
"Adam knew Eve, his wife, and she conceived and gave birth to a son" or "I have two daughters, who have not yet known a man;
I'll take those out for you, do with them what you want" - said Lot).
It can be seen that the "divine guide", about whom the Bible Code itself speaks, interpreted the form in this sense...
The "Guide" launched the invitation on his initiative and even organized a system aimed at bringing the women to Paris but, in front of the court from France threw the responsibility on God, declaring that "the women loved him at his home after a stage called consecration", that is, God responded affirmatively to the consecration of "initiation" and therefore approved it.
This is the answer given by Bivolaru and his fanatical followers to the previous question "how does he come to consider that the time has come a spiritual test for disciples". "God" tells him that it's time, through the affirmative answer to the consecration of sexual initiation.
The problem is that first there was the filling of the form and the invitation, and only at the end was the consecration of the "initiation".
Some will say: "Maybe he consecrated the invitation together with the action of bringing them to Paris. Everything Grieg does is divinely integrated"!
But then how come there are refusals, horrible experiences or even criminal complaints? Does not God foresee this?
Does God push women into doing things they don't want to do or even into perdition?
According to the "spiritual guide" Bivolaru, God - omniscient and knowing the future with certainty - sent the two women to a test that HE - God - knew BEFORE they would "fail".
On the other hand, all the "spiritual guide" Bivolaru quotes Jesus, in his message about demonic doubts:
"Don't forget that always, without exception, GOD the FATHER does not want the destruction of the sinner (or the lost), but his correction." đ
Therefore, if the "logic of the guide" is followed, through his affirmative answer to the consecration, God directed the women to a crucial test after which HE knew they would leave the school and one would even file a complaint, but how he didn't want
losing the "wanderers" but correcting them, it turns out that it was better for them that way!
This is what happens when you manipulate arguments to get your point across, instead of relying on the truth: they end up contradicting each other!
If all arguments were based on truth, there would be no contradictions, because truth does not cancel itself.
Obviously, it cannot be a question of an involvement of God, who neither tempts nor desires the loss of man.
Being about a cunning and diabolical impostor, these "trials" can no longer be considered "spiritual tests", but cunning and perverse games aimed at the subjugation and mind control of followers , games that can have serious effects
in the case of people with a fragile psyche or who are emotionally attached to the "guide".
But those at MISA believe that Bivolaru's perverse games are "sui-generis" true, crucial spiritual tests:
Advaitananda's disciple:
"Spiritual tests that mark our evolution on the path of self-perfection are inevitable. It is said that even Jesus was not spared by them, so we are all subject to spiritual tests. The spiritual test appears as a result of a divine necessity, it is not just a random situation that we face to prove our level acquired until then.
The spiritual test is meant to validate a certain inner realization, it is like an exam after which we obtain a certificate.
If he successfully passes the spiritual test, the disciple ascends to a higher level of consciousness. The much higher state than the one before the test is in itself a proof that he passed the spiritual exam.
If he failed, however, the aspirant faces a state of regression, which actually marks this very spiritual lag. đ
Worse, the regression can become a definitive collapse sui-generis, as the "Guide" itself says:
"If an aspirant fails several important spiritual tests, he also regresses in his inner universe there are some changes that have an adverse effect." đ
Some followers believe that the MISA "guide" cannot even be wrong:
"How would it be possible for me to believe that I can free myself on this spiritual path, in this school, with Grieg as my teacher , if He can still be wrong? What assurance could I have that I will be able to receive from HIM the Grace of Liberation at a given moment?
What trust, as a spiritual being who guides me permanently, could I still have in Him, if he still makes mistakes?
By a wrong counsel, He might misdirect me, and thus my whole life would turn in a different direction, even evil, than that which should come to me, through him, from God." đ
But in the case of the two trainees whom he called to him and who, following the shocking experiences, left from the great school "leaving the spiritual path", and now they are reporting to the police, did he guide them well?
The same absolute servant who asked himself before, gives his own answer and concludes:
"I have to tell you that for me the Spiritual Master is God and he can NEVER make a mistake!
He may be apparently wrong (to SOME !!!), but he does nothing that he is not aware of, and even if you think he is wrong, he actually adopts by divine inspiration a certain attitude in order to create certain reactions in us)." đ
If the great guide can never err, and therefore he did not err but did deeply, consciously and righteously of which the victims who consider themselves abused now accuse him, then why so much trouble with the actions of the authorities in France?
It means he knew what he was doing, he took the consequences and that's it! Enough, be aware! That's how it has to be, it's God's will that the police came, it is God's will that the "guide" was in France and not in Sweden, where he had protection! And that's it!
However, the previous quote hides something serious. It is not only the fact that the "guide" is considered infallible, but here it is a matter of manipulation very perverse: when it seems that the "guide" is wrong, in fact he is not wrong, he does so in order to cause reactions, it is a spiritual test!
The "spiritual test" is a perverse trick designed to sweep spiritual garbage under the rug and nullify questions and doubts what may arise in the minds of the followers, thus aiming at the total subjugation of their minds.
In the case of the two former students who accuse abuse, they did not "fall" as a result of doubts that appeared to them at a given moment on the "spiritual path", but precisely as a result of the actions exerted directly on them by the "spiritual guide".
The "head of wickedness, the tempting devil" who caused their "fall" is the very "guide" himself!
That is why the concept of "spiritual test from the master" was invented :
to hide the mistakes of the "guide" and to justify all his misdeeds!
Focusing attention on the case of "tantric initiations offered by Bivolaru in Paris" is essential not through the prism of the scandal (as the tabloid press does"), but in that it provides the clearest proof of Bivolaru's imposture as a "spiritual guide".
If other games can be formally justified by the idea of "spiritual test", this case cannot be justified at all because, whatever the possible hypotheses, intractable contradictions arise:
➤ 1 : " Bivolaru is a perfect spiritual guide, he is one with God, so he knew in advance what the result would be ",
lead to the conclusion that he ACTUALLY pushed the trainees into an experience against their free will and spiritual principles ("forced love, without love"), as well as in the direction of leaving the spiritual path (although "God does not want the loss of the sinner"!?), which obviously contradicts the hypothesis of the "perfect guide" and shows the pose of the tempting devil.
➤ 2 : " Bivolaru did not know what the result of the test would be, but he listened to God's Will expressed through the answer affirmative to consecration" (according to his own statements in court), would lead to the idea that " God is the culprit ", for HE would have urged the two women to accept "sexual initiation" against their will and spiritual principles and would have led them to destruction.
The only hypothesis without contradictions is:
➤ 3 : " Bivolaru did not know what the result of the test would be and he acted according to his desire", and the violation of free will of invited students, of spiritual and criminal laws, are natural consequences of his irresponsibility.
Knowing Bivolaru and the MISA people, they would jump up at hearing these considerations, they would start looking for justifications which would serve to support their version, and they would throw out examples from various spiritual traditions, which they would interpret as they saw fit.
đč The biblical example of Job: in the recent conference broadcast as a result of the events in France and entitled
"The EXTRAORDINARY GOOD NEWS: Revelatory aspects of immense importance, which are revealed to us both through the initiatory modality of the I-Ching system and through the secret Biblical Code" , it is said, I quote:
"This book tells the story of the most righteous and faithful man of those times, who was put to a fundamental test.
God allows Satan to cause Job much suffering after Satan cunningly claimed that exemplary devotion of Job would be due to his happy and prosperous life, and that he would no longer be capable of such holiness if he were dispossessed of his prosperity and peace, on the contrary, he could even end up cursing God. The ending of Job's story is a happy one, he manages to triumph and keep his love for God and unshakable faith in HIM unshaken.”
So, once again, God does not subject Job to the test, but allows it, knowing in advance that he will triumph!
In the present case, the Bivolaru "guide" triggers - without knowing what follows - the "test" on some students, who then "failed the test", leaving him and even turning against him.
đč The example of Babaji , invoked by the servant Muriel in his letter to Claudiu:
"A stranger arrives, climbing with difficulty, on the mountain wall, to a holy gathering where Babaji was. That stranger was not even Babaji's disciple, just a being who had been looking for him for months.
He asked him to accept him as a disciple, but Babaji did not answer him. Then the man pointed to a huge chasm and said:
- Life has no value for me if I am unworthy of your spiritual teaching.
- Jump, in that case! Babaji said coldly. I cannot accept you in your current state of spiritual evolution.
Without saying a word, the man threw himself into the abyss. Then Babaji sent his shocked disciples to look for the stranger.
When they returned with his broken body, the Master then placed his divine hands on the head of the dead man who opened his eyes and humbly knelt at the feet of the almighty Guru.
- Now here you are ready to become my disciple - he told him. đ
In reality, as can be seen in the original ( đ page 231), the stranger tells Babaji:
" If you refuse me , I will jump off this mountain. Life is worthless if I cannot gain Your guidance to the Divine.”
This completely changes the situation. That stranger unconsciously manifested a "foreign" attitude of a disciple, which was practically equivalent with a blackmail by which he forced Babaji's hand, leaving the master no choice but to refuse, for he could not to accept an individual who displayed such an attitude and to succumb to such psychological blackmail.
In fact, Babaji's answer is more like "You just have to jump, I can't accept you in this way anyway!", thus leaving the individual to choose for himself and not telling him how to act.
The "aspirant" had two possibilities: either to refuse to jump, which automatically disqualified him for not keeping his promise, either jump, in which case what followed depended on the aspirant's karma and/or Babaji's level of attainment.
If the aspirant was a demented suicidal fanatic, the result was death by crushing. If Babaji was a false master, ditto.
It worked out well only in the situation where the aspirant deserved resurrection and acceptance, but Babaji was also a genuine master, capable of granting them.
In the book it is shown that Babaji would have said to the new disciple: " You bravely passed a difficult test! ”, to which MISA would jump up:
"See, well, it's a spiritual test?"
Yes, it is a spiritual test, but one that the aspirant triggered ALONE.
The aspirant wanted to meet Babaji, he alone decided to look for him, he found him and he also put himself in that situation, the initiative was always the aspirant's alone, he was never invited or pushed into a situation he didn't want.
Babaji had not responded at all to his original request, which is deeply significant, for he had left that one to act.
It is not a test that the master put the aspirant through, it is a test that the disciple triggered and Babaji had no other choice than to proceed in the way he did.
If, making a parallel, the women who ended up being "sexually initiated" by Bivolaru in Paris had ended up in that situation at their request, with their effort and at their expense, in full knowledge of the matter, then it would have been their choice, their request and therefore their responsibility!
But the invitation came from the "guide" without being asked, they were attracted and deceived, they did not know that it was a sexual act, they were transported
by an organized network subordinate to the "guide", under the conditions imposed by him (trafficked), so the "guide" is (i)responsible!
đč Abraham's example - God gave Abraham a son, Isaac, in his old age but, at a certain point, asked him to offer as a sacrifice (burnt offering) his only offspring. As Abraham was about to perform the sacrifice, an angel of the Lord stops him. So the test was not carried to the end, but the intention and therefore the faith of Abraham was tested.
Drawing a parallel, Bivolaru could have called the women to him, made them understand that a sexual act "is necessary" but, if he had noticed hesitation and even repulsion in some of them, he could have said at the last moment:
"it's enough, it's enough, through your effort manifested even against what you feel and want, you passed the test!
Or to tell them: "considering both your hesitations and the fact that because a love fusion requires intense love and attraction, at least at this moment it is not the case of a sexual initiation".
But was it so? Seeing their hesitation, he said to the women: "Calm down, relax, surrender!"
To those who burst into tears, he said: "Yes, you have some problems here and there. You just took them out and it's better now!", although it was not better, as one of them testified.
To those who didn't perform as he wanted, he said: "If you do it like that next time, you'll be in trouble!"
To those who refused at the last moment, he said: "Egotic, demonic!"
Adding to this the whole organized system for bringing in women, including the swimsuit or nude photo circus for "reading the aura", as well as hiding the real reason for the invitation, one can say: Bivolaru is not Jehovah, it's Beelzebub!
Be that as it may, even if they are "passed with flying colors", the tests involving a blind faith cannot lead to anything good, but to fanaticism!
đč The example of Milarepa : While he was a disciple of Marpa, the Tibetan yogi Milarepa was submitted (in fact he submitted) to certain tests from his master. But Milarepa is the one who came to Marpa and asked to be initiated, offering himself to him with everything, I quote:
"I, Precious Teacher, am a great sinner from the Western Highlands and I have come here to offer myself to you, body, word and mind.
I beseech you to give me food, clothing and education and enable me to attain Liberation in this very life.” ( page 21 đ )
In the "Trials" chapter that begins on the same page, Milarepa describes the tests to which HE SUBJECTED willingly and without being forced by anyone, always knowing why he does this, always aware that he must be tested not only to receive the teaching, but mostly to burn off his terrible karma as a murderous black magician.
So it was entirely Milarepa's initiative and choice, who knew exactly why he had come and why he had devoted himself totally to the master.
And Master Marpa confessed that he knew from the beginning that Milarepa was destined to be his main disciple, what he would achieve The Ultimate Achievement, so he would successfully pass all the tests he would be subjected to, whatever they might be:
The lama, seeing what they were doing, said to himself: <Worthy of praise is this shyshya (disciple) who, given with all his heart, obeys the commands of his Guru>; and secretly shed tears of joy, seeing my sincerity and confidence in him. ( page 26 đ )
Marpa said that in the dream-vision he had had, his Guru, Naropa, had given me the name Mila, the Diamond-Standard, from the very beginning).
I was asked to keep the vows of those who aspire to be Buddha Teachers or Bodhisattvas (page 36 )
Then, placing his hand on the top of my head, he said: <My son, I knew, right from the beginning, that you would be an illustrious shyshya.
The night before you arrived here, I had a dream that predicted that you would be one of those who would serve our Cause very effectively.
You are a shyshya gifted to me by my Guru and Guardian Goddess. All these foretold that you would be an illustrious shyshya, who will fully assimilate the Spiritual Truths that I am going to share with you . (page 37)
Compare with the situation of the trainees, called to Bivolaru without knowing exactly why, being put in front of them to sign first forms in which it was stipulated in advance that what was actually going to follow did not happen (that is, they were going to literally offer their bodies!)
Bivolaru himself did not know if it was the case that those trainees were "initiated" sexually, evidence that some refused in advance, and others felt horrible, left him and even reported him, putting the international police on his trail.
It is clear that Bivolaru read too many tantric books and imagined or even dreamed that he was a great Tibetan master (though he himself had no master and received no initiation), then believing that he was permitted to do anything, against free will
of the disciples, against spiritual principles and against penal laws.
đč Drukpa Kunley's example:
Adinathananda : "I will next address a general aspect which is, in my opinion, essential for a deep understanding of a certain inner process that can help us tremendously when we are subjected to spiritual trials.
This aspect can be called, for example, "spiritual assumption" and I will define it very succinctly starting from a concrete example.
This divine way of reacting and openly recognizing our mistakes or the difficulties we still face - even if we have already reached a high level of spiritual realization - it should be an example and a constant way of acting for all of us.
That is precisely why I am convinced that what Grieg is pursuing through all these public actions has a purifying value and transformative inestimable - or, at least, difficult for many of us to notice now, because they have an extremely profound effect which is only beginning to be realized by some." đ
However, in the story contained in the text highlighted in the previous address, Drukpa Kunley did not test a disciple, he made observations regarding a master with a high degree of achievement. So it can't be said that Kunley pushed him, subconsciously or unconsciously, the master Karmapa in a test that the latter might have failed.
Kunley's tests usually targeted people who already had a rich spiritual experience.
Furthermore, in addition to his shocking manifestations that often constituted spiritual tests, Kunley each time gave evidence of his spiritual capacities, which were recognized by those who initially blamed him (original text here đ ).
By comparison, Bivolaru invited mostly young women to him. Some of them were trainees for a short time, as the case may be to the Australian Ashleigh Freckleton who was introduced to Villa's programs after only a few months of correspondence course!
How many times have you heard that Bivolaru invites older women with rich life experience or spiritual experience to him?
In fact, the very idea of "sexual initiation" means that it must take place as close to the beginning of sexual life as possible.
In conclusion, the "great tantric master" Bivolaru subjected to sexual "initiation" trainees who had no spiritual experience, being therefore unsuitable for being subjected to spiritual tests, especially from the "complex" category!
Regarding the parallel that MISA minions often draw between Bivolaru and Drukpa Kunley, on Rapcea's blog there is the following article: "Small guide to identifying a fake tantric master - Gregorian Bivolaru face to face with Drukpa Kunley" đ
EXAMPLES of "TESTS"
Bivolaru retracted erroneous statements he had previously made during conferences about "Isotopic Labeling" - "Luciferic Service" Easter Vigil from the Vatican, "Pope Francis Aberrations" - farce from the CaÈavencu Academy and "Mores and Tempers"
- about the non-existence of female masonic lodges in Romania, on which occasion he retracted a bet he had made himself.
The followers then said that Bivolaru had done this in advance and that these were spiritual tests meant to weed out those who they don't fully trust him.
In reality, Bivolaru had to retract the erroneous statements after the idiocies were pointed out to him on the former ExMisa forum - where former MISA students wrote, who had already left the courses ("they had already failed the tests") - or was warned by those from MISA:
Bivolaru : "We consider it necessary to inform you that it has been brought to our attention that the article on which the third short conference is totally bogus. Therefore, the editors from the scandal publication "Academia CaÈavencu" are the ones who they labeled it and then declared it a pamphlet. We apologize for this awkward situation, but that article it was passed on to us as such, and it was later brought to our attention that it was fake news."
Bivolaru : "We inform you that it is urgently necessary to do our mea culpa and admit that we did not have access to some recent information, which shows that a masonic lodge for women was already created in Romania.
We inform you that the said bet is no longer valid at all. Additionally, I received a message from an aspirant, which reveals to us about the recruitment of women in the Masonic lodge in Romania."
In fact, these were not "spiritual tests". If it had really been like that, Bivolaru would have left the "infidels and crooks" to simmer in the "venom of their doubt" until they had left the course they did not deserve and retracted the claims immediately,
at the next conference, when many "suspects" would have changed their minds ("wow, he frankly admitted his error!")
It is actually Bivolaru who failed these tests because he was intoxicated with false information by his idiot followers who send him fakes from embarrassing sites and groups (without the idiots intending it, proof that the blunders kept repeating themselves), and the Great Know-it-all was unable to notice that said information was false.
Bivolaru was accused of sending Remus LomoÈ to Germany (although he did not want to), the latter dying on the way in a car accident.
Bivolaru also indicated to several trainees so-called herbal treatments for serious diseases, for which the trainees gave up to allopathic treatments or operations, some of them eventually dying.
They passed the "test of trust in the spiritual guide" (along with the border between the worlds), but the "guide" failed the skills test of a clairvoyant, respectively of a healer.
other details:
https://exmisa.blogspot.com/2023/08/falsul-maestru-infailibilul.html
PS: Of course, all that is exposed refers to the important spiritual tests, which involve choices of crucial importance, which are meant to attest to the moral and spiritual level.
For the QUANTITATIVE assessment of some skills or ordinary knowledge, exam or quiz type tests are natural, for they must assess and quantify concretely whether someone is fit to move on to the next stage of activity, respectively of learning. In this case, a failed test is not a mental shock or a moral or spiritual regression but, on the contrary, it even brings a surplus of knowledge and experience.
Likewise, certain life lessons through staged situations (such as those depicted in martial arts films) can be instructive, if they don't go too far though.
In any case, they cannot be compared with the "trust test" to which MISA students invited to the guru are subjected to allow themselves to be "sexually initiated" - practically trafficked and raped - despite the hesitations and disgust they experience.
The Venetian Beauty and the Parisian Beast
The "affirmative answer to consecration" became the justification for all the crap from MISA and from other aberrations conceived in the shadow of MISA:
Victim : I don't understand this... How do I do 30 hours in 3 days?
MĂźrtz Eugen : Let's let God show us! Make a consecration about it!
Victim : Good!
"While in custody, Bivolaru denied the accusations against him, but said that he was "endowed with extraordinary gifts" and that he was a "spiritual leader", a police source said. After they passed the "consecration" stage, the women "loved" him at his home, the source reported" đ .
"Even though God answered in the affirmative to the consecration, so also to the sexual initiation was divinely integrated" , the guru would say.
He wants to say that God gave him permission to go "to work".
What about the female guests, who "loved him at his home", what about them? He asked them what they felt at the "consecration"?
Here is what the victim named "Eva" đ reports about her experience:
Eva : Then we sat on the bed. [...] It tried me to keep talking and keep the conversation going, just to avoid what could have followed.
filmmaker : Eva remembers exactly how Bivolaru asks her this one question:
Eva : "If I want to experience spiritual expansion". And I immediately knew what that meant, and then I asked very clearly:
"Does this have to happen in order to progress spiritually?"
director : Eva wants to say: "Do we really have to have sex now? With him?" She remembers that Bivolaru tried to convince her.
Eva : "Do you want to experiment? Want to dig deeper into this? Above all, relax and let go! Let's meditate together."
Then we sat facing each other, he took my hands and we meditated. And the strangest thing was that they happened again things I can't explain. [...] I noticed how a sexual desire was triggered, but I can't tell you what it was and how it happened. [...] Then, basically, it started with the transition to real intercourse, [...] with all these awakenings of the chakras through intercourse.
Therefore, from Eve's account, it does not follow that she would have achieved the consecration of the love act. Obviously, we cannot know about Bivolaru what he did in his meditation (but we can guess...). However, it is known with certainty what he declared, for the first time on the planet, about the consecration:
conf . about Consecration , August 1995 , Costinesti (audio đ 10min:36sec – 12min:46sec):
Bivolaru : It is very important for you, especially when you and your loved one are on the verge of an intimate love fusion, never lose sight of the fact that this offering of the fruits of action must necessarily be offered to God.
There are still beings, even in the senior years and often even among the instructors, who make mistakes.
Even now they have not understood that, at such a moment, even more so, they must realize this consecration.
If you are dealing with such beings who have not yet understood the importance of consecration, no matter what year they are in, no matter what posture you are in with that one, to stop and not want to continue that communion any further
that sticks out, even at the risk of upsetting that person and making him say that you are strange.
Eva had not yet "understood the importance of consecration" or was she rather a novice student who had not yet received the consecration technique?
She had just enrolled in DAtY's Tantra classes and was in Paris in late 2006, 15 years before Nathalie's trip in Paris in the fall of 2021. However, there was no problem, as the Great Guru revealed the solution:
conf. Consecration , 1995 (50min:28sec – 52min:15sec đ ):
Question : In the case of love fusion with a non-yogic person, is it enough that only the person who practices Yoga does the consecration?
Bivolaru : Yes, know that it is sufficient , but mandatory , even then. And if you happen to be dealing with a weirder person, who is so suspicious that she finds it strange that you have to hold hands for 2-3 minutes when you do the consecration,
[...] you do it for her [...] and you feel that integration, that response of God. If the answer does not appear, then refrain, that there is something wrong there. Either that person is sick, or has who knows what kind of karmic past that makes them satanic and to influence your aura in a harmful way, God knows what about it, but it is clear that you should not get involved there.
You stop even if it was something furious, very passionate, discuss other aspects and see if it's time.
"If the answer does not appear, then refrain, because there is something wrong there" : maybe she does not like the initiation, she considers herself abused
sexually, calls radio stations and badmouths the guru and his movement, then the German journalists start to do investigations for some podcast, if the news goes around the world and again he has to give MISA lies.
"God knows what's wrong with her" , but it seems that the guru didn't know, since he couldn't help it, that he was furious and passionate and, despite his own warnings(!), he took action. The evil watch!
conf. Consecration , 1995 (37min:15sec – 37min:59sec đ ):
Bivolaru : In the situation where some actions are not followed by this response, that action is not accepted by God and then we must not realize it. We just stop, because something is wrong there.
If God does not accept this gift of ours, it means that something is not in harmony, either in the being with which we merge, either at that moment, which can be a bad hour that still generates resonances in our being.
But in the end, what's the big deal if you don't consecrate before the "merger"? The guru himself warns:
conf. Consecration , 1995 (14min:08sec – 14min:44sec đ ):
Bivolaru : The problem is very serious, even if you can look at it as a superfluous matter, which can be easily passed over, because you know that amorous fusions with continence, even when they are crowned with success, release colossal energies, which - if you have not achieved this consecration of fruits to God and if you do not achieve liberation in this existence - you may incarnate 4-5 more times for a single love fusion to reap its sweet but still binding fruits.
Of course, Bivolaru being already a great liberator, he cannot be chained by karma... But even if he should reincarnate 4-5 times, that is, so many lives full of sexual initiations, what's the problem? The problem would be for the women next to him, but what does it matter?
Maybe Bivolaru, being a god, gives them exemption from the law of karma... Or, simply, he doesn't care!
Instead, the victim Nathalie clearly specifies that she has achieved the prior consecration of the fruits of the love act.
Here's what it says:
Nathalie : This is when we basically ask God if the act is integrated. I didn't feel like I had a choice. I just knew that if I said "NO" now, he would say:
"What's wrong with you? Your demons and everything else and your ego” and blah blah blah. So I just didn't have the feeling that I was safe and that I could say "well, NO, the answer is NO!"
I still remember the moment he took off his bathrobe. And I mean, he's just an old man. And my reaction was, "wow, it doesn't work", but I put it aside because they were my demons, I couldn't listen to them.
It is understood that Nathalie did not have the courage to admit that she did not receive an affirmative answer, or at least that she did not want to anyway to engage. But this situation betrays Bivolaru, who stated the following about such situations, I quote:
conf. Consecration , 1995 (1h:59min:13sec – 1h:59min:35sec đ ):
Question : It is possible that, before a love fusion, in the consecration of the fruits of the divine, one of the lovers will receive an answer, and not the other one?
Bivolaru : It is not possible . At the most, let them both notice that this consecration is not received, the fruits are not accepted.
new conference on Consecration , part 2 , August 2015 (audio đ 43min:16sec – 51min:25sec):
Bivolaru : It is fundamental, it is essential that the two lovers receive - each of them - an affirmative answer beforehand at consecration, and if such an affirmative answer does not appear, does not come, when God answers by silence, it is not necessary to force the grade, it is not necessary to deceive the other.
Do not play with consecration because even if a clear affirmative answer appeared for one of the two lovers , this does not imply that he or she who indulges in such an action will be spared the consequences of that amorous fusion [...] although the human being who has responded to the consecration, will imagine that she is free to engage in amorous fusion with the other human being which received no affirmative response to the consecration at all, such a strange pot will not remain without traces and then, because the law of harmony is violated, both will later suffer the karmic consequences of their love game, and both as well as the other will have karma.
Don't let yourself be tempted to engage in experiences, even amorous ones, when it doesn't appear to both of you - when they are face to face - an affirmative answer as soon as they have previously achieved the consecration of the fruits of their fusion.
There is no problem with the "liberated", they are free whatever they do; the law of karma is only for common dudes...
new conference on Consecration, part 2 , response to tickets, August 2015 (audio đ 15min:03sec – 16min:18sec):
Bivolaru : We want to remind you in a clear, firm and categorical way, if there is no answer to one of the two lovers at consecration and appears only in the other , refrain from engaging in such amorous play, for it does not present the divine integration.
The situation is the same in the case of a love fusion in threes, fours, fives, etc. If one of the participants does not receive response to the consecration, it is not possible to achieve that love fusion either in three or in four , etc.
Although he had previously declared that "it is not possible for one of the partners to receive an affirmative answer to the consecration of the love act, and the other does not' , now speak of this situation as possible!
Let's also note that the mouth speaks without a guru about " love fusions in threes, fours, fives, etc. ", although at MISA there is no group sex! (at most, individually...)
Since two are needed in an act of love, it would be illogical (or perverse) for God to give approval to one and prohibition to the other!
Since he moved on to the sexual initiation of the student, Bivolaru considered that he had received an affirmative answer, therefore implicitly considered that the student in question received - in her turn - an affirmative answer.
Regarding this situation, there are the following hypothetical possibilities:
➤ God would have given an affirmative answer to both (but this would mean disregarding the woman's free will!)
➤ God respected the free will of the woman and did not answer the two, but the libidinous tantric, driven by his impulses, he disregarded the rule stated by himself
➤ against her will, fearful of the reaction that could have occurred from the libidinous side, the student implied that she would have received answered in the affirmative, and Bivolaru consented - either against what he felt, or he did not feel, but he agreed
and/or
➤ the method of consecrating the fruits of actions, as indicated by the Great Esoteric, is "defective" or even false.
However you put it, there is something wrong with the regulation that followed.
Maybe the Great Macrocosmic Initiate "integrated her into his immense aura"? It is not possible, because the Initiate himself said, I quote:
conf. Consecration part 2 , response to tickets, 2015 ( 16min:18sec – 17min:52sec đ ):
Bivolaru : We would like to specify an aberration that we have heard and which is a big mistake.
Some who are greedy or some who are greedy to have certain love experiences want to, so to speak, spread the basil and then if the consecration does not work out for the other person, he or she offers himself or herself abnormally and says:
"Come on, it's nothing, I'll do the consecration for you! ” and then after making the consecration, says triumphantly:
"Come on, now we can get busy, because I did the consecration in your place and I got an answer, so go to bed!"
This is an obvious aberration and you should never be fooled / tricked by such nonsense.
On simple analysis, it turns out that it was like this: she was afraid to say NO and mimed YES, and he was AVID, so he agreed and, in order to correct the basilisk, he pretended that he also received an affirmative answer.
conf. Consecration part 2 , 2015 ( 1h:22min:59 sec –1h:24min:22sec đ ):
Bivolaru : When in some cases we find that the answer to the consecration does not appear and we thus discover that God answers us in silence, it is spontaneously possible to mirror in an empathic, paranormal way the inner universe of the human being before us, and on that occasion we shall discover as in a Venetian mirror what were the causes which made let's not receive a positive affirmative answer to the prior consecration that was carried out with a view to a love fusion.
If the Great Clairvoyant had been a "Venetian mirror" and had "paranormally mirrored" the one in front of him, he would have known that she did not want
to be "mirrored" by him and, in addition, she would have seen that that unwanted experience was going to make her drop out of the great school.
But as seen now, the mirror was broken. The Great Paranormal is not a Venetian mirror, it's a VENICE BUSH! đ
A bush or, rather, a bush rooted in Paris!
Consecration Ă la Bivolaru - a truly planetary premiere
The German podcast Toxic Tantra touched on a sensitive point: how ATMAN trainees are manipulated and determined to succumb to sexual abuse from the guru of the organization, against their will at the moment.
One of the subtle and perverse means used by the abuser is to "transfer" the decision from the female trainees to the "supreme authority" - "God" - through a technique exposed and promoted even by the abuser: "consecrating the fruits of actions to the Divine".
The necessity of detachment from the fruits of action is revealed by Lord Krishna in the Bhagavad-Gita. Very briefly:
- action is inevitable, avoiding action and inertia lead to nothing
- any action generates effects (the fruits of the action) whose nature depends on the nature of the action and the nature of the goals pursued
- the fruits of the action do not refer to the things that appear as a result of its performance (which are part of the action), but to the GOALS pursued đ
- by virtue of the Law of Cause and Effect, the one who performs the action bears its effects, so he is bound to the fruits of the action
- bad fruits bring suffering to the one who does bad deeds, good fruits bring pleasure to the one who does good deeds
- even good fruits bind the one who produces them, through the obligation of incarnation for their fruition; hence the need to renounce the fruits of actions or detachment from them (disinterested action)
- the detached action does not chain the one who acts in this way
- as any action without a goal has no meaning, giving up the fruits of the action is done by offering them to the Divine
So far, all fine and dandy: everything is clear, coherent, logical and fair. The problems start when it comes to THE MODE by which the fruits of the action are offered as an offering to the Divine.
Krishna does not reveal a technique for consecrating the fruits of action, but suggests that it is a matter of inner attitude throughout the performance of the action, I quote:
"Abandon and give all your deeds to the Divine"; "No matter what you do, do everything detached as an offering to Me.
Thus you will be freed from the good or bad results that make up the chains of selfish action”; "Do all your actions detachedly, only for the love of Me".
Religions and limited cults understand by "offering" the actual sacrifice: objects are offered by depositing them in temples or in front of altars containing representations of deities.
The animals are killed (SACRIFIED) and then, together with grain, incense or sacred plants, they are set on fire, hence their smoke he ascends and carries them to the gods to whom they are offered.
More evolved religious systems believe - rightly so - that the offering of objects, plants or animals to the Creator it is nonsense, because they belong to the Creator anyway, since they are created and permanently sustained by Him.
Man can offer to the Divine only what actually belongs to him: the fruits of his actions performed by free choice.
The Bhagavad-Gita and its commentators suggest đ that the offering of fruits to the Divine is accomplished by:
- CHOOSING to do GOOD ACTIONS (pure, Sattvice)
- THE DETACHMENT of the fruits of the action by the one who commits it, by RENUNCIATION of these fruits
- THE MENTAL ATTITUDE OF OFFERING TO THE DIVINE, MAINTAINED FOR THE ENTIRE DURATION OF THE GOOD ACTION (action performed for the Divine, in the name of the Divine), certified by the DEDICATION of body and soul on the part of the one who carry out the action, so that it brings as many and good fruits as possible, therefore as pleasing to the Divine, attitude called KARMA YOGA - "instant and permanent yoga of life", "nonaction, state of Divine instrument", the constant awareness that it is not the doer who actually acts, but the Divine acts through him - the state of consciousness that arises after the perfect realization of non-action - centering in SELF, LIBERATION
Bivolaru, trickster, "combined" all these ("integral yoga, synthesis of all syntheses" blah, blah) and produced a ritual technique: vocal or mental utterance of a fixed formula, followed by the perception or awareness of the "Divine response".
The great preacher of the state of spontaneity and authentic living, created a formal and superficial ritual.
This little book of Bivolaru is no longer found anywhere, in any of the spiritual traditions!
The Master without Masters, but who at the same time claims to come from an "authentic millennial spiritual line", he came up with something new, something that is not even mentioned in the Karma Yoga path book!
conference on Consecration part 1 , 2014 (audio đ 1h:21min:34sec – 1h:22min:14sec):
"It is essential to remember that for now, in the sphere of planet Earth, it is for the first time that the mysteries of the consecration of the fruits of God the Father are revealed in a simple, practical form, which can be of real use to all human beings."
conf . about Consecration , August 1995 , CostineÈti (audio đ 1h:14min:31sec – 1h:15min:22sec):
Question : Do we need to say any more words or thoughts?
Buffalo : Yes. I told you that we must say the words I said to you, or possibly think them, and after saying them or we thought them, let's try to realize if God really receives these fruits of ours.
If this action of ours is accepted and God charges us further to accomplish it, then we can truly go let's continue to act. If no answer comes from God, then it is necessary that we do not, not to act in that direction.
You say the formula and that's it, it's done! Bivolaru , in the conference on Consecration in 1995 says:
So, considering that a consecration does not take you more than 4-5 minutes - for very important actions - and more than a minute for actions that are more secondary, it is worth not losing sight of and even doing them.
To top it off, on other occasions, the same Bivolaru showed how difficult karma yoga really is and, in this sense, he quoted (how else!) according to the masters of the traditional ways:
Bivolaru : We must never imagine that the perfection and wonderful achievements that become possible through karma yoga are easy to reach. Even the intellectual understanding of its rules and their correct application is not an easy thing at all.
Krishna says in the Bhagavad-Gita: "On what is actually detached action and on what is actually inaction, even the wise are sometimes perplexed and some are even mistaken. đ
Come on, it's someone from TartÄÈeÈti who did what even Krishna didn't do: he discovered a simple method, for beginners!
Where even the wise give chix, Bivolaru and his ageamii beginners are full of successes!
Ramakrishna : Totally disinterested action is otherwise very difficult, especially in our times.
To act completely detached, without any selfish attachment, is extremely difficult. đ
It's not difficult at all: you tell the parrot a fixed formula, you wait for the beasts to come down from the nest, and that's it! Problem solved!
Swami Vivekananda notes, not without some disappointment, that: "He who can act completely detached for five days or at least five minutes, without any selfish motive, whatever it may be, without thinking at all of the future, of the sky, of rewards, of punishments, or to any end of the same kind, he will become a powerful divine, mental and moral giant in a flash. đ
Don't be disappointed Viveka, look it's not five days but thirty five years and MISA is full of mental giants, not to mention moral giants... And though they are not wise, they understand everything from the first exposure and feel from the first;
from the first words, they already have states of divine ecstasy. You only have to say the formula!
Let's say that the fixed formula (which must be uttered, before proceeding to the realization of the action, in the form that was given), it helps to precisely objectify both the intention of action and the attitude of offering the fruits of action to a particular deity.
The problem would not be here.
The problem is in what Bivolaru "revealed for the first time in the sphere of the planet": "the answer to the consecration", that is, what is perceived IMMEDIATELY after the ritual formula is uttered. The answer should be one of these two possibilities:
- The divine accepts the fruits of the action - and implicitly approves the action - indicating this by a clear answer, what is perceived as such by the one who consecrates the fruits of action
- The divine does not accept these fruits and implicitly does not approve the action whose fruits were consecrated to him, a fact signaled by the lack of of any manifestation and therefore by the lack of any perception on the part of the one who consecrates.
conf . about Consecration , August 1995 , CostineÈti (38min:54sec – 41min:06sec đ ):
Question : If we consecrate, can we consider that the respective action no longer has karmic effects?
Bivolaru : This statement is real, provided that this consecration is really done and obviously that it exists this answer from God. It is not all that we said: "Lord, I give you the fruits of my action today!"
If after that we do not feel that state of ecstatic communion, that response of God which is, if you will, like a reaction, then it cannot be said that we have truly made a consecration and that we will not be obliged for the fruits of our action to chain us,
that we shall not be obliged, as a result of our action, to be again in manifestation, in a subsequent incarnation, to eat these fruits of our action, to receive the consequences of our present action.
It is not all to consecrate, but to feel that our consecration has been accepted; and this is not an inner voice telling you "Yes, son, all right," but it is an inner state, an ineffable reaction that appears clearly and indubitably, as something uplifting,
transfiguring, which deifies us for a few fractions of a second or even for minutes on end.
In fact, the method is much more perverse because, although "consulting God" is carried out immediately before the start of the action, the manipulation started long before. Here are the stages of "consecration" in reality:
- even before the "consecration", it was inoculated in the minds of the students that all the actions carried out under the auspices of MISA are "divine".
If anyone has reservations about these actions, it is - only for him - "demonic doubts". Thus, the students expect in advance that the answer of the "divine" to this kind of actions will always appear and be affirmative.
The refusal of the "divine" - the lack of response - can occur "accidentally" only when consecrating the actions that are carried out on the students' own initiative.
- the fixed formula is spoken and the answer is awaited
- the answer in the case of actions "guaranteed" by MISA is always affirmative and beyond any doubt.
But if any practitioner seems somehow to have received a negative response to the consecration, it means that he is not harmoniously integrated, he is the "black sheep", because the others received an affirmative answer and this proves that the action is "divinely" integrated.
Or, worse, under collective pressure, he believes that he actually perceived an affirmative answer, but he wasn't paying enough attention.
Then, Bivolaru claims as an absolute manifestation of the Divinity - the approval or lack of approval of the action on His part - to be perceived " clearly and indubitably ", unequivocally - by a being with limited, subjective perceptions.
How indubitable is " an ineffable state "?
God is constantly manifesting in mystery (it is the deepest mystery), but limited man is not at all aware of This, for if he were conscious, his existence would be radically transformed. That is the problem, that man is not aware, he is not capable to feel the existence, presence or direct manifestation of God.
But Bivolaru keeps his own, as if the answer of the Divine is " clear and indubitable ".
conference on Consecration , August 1995 , Costinesti (1h:16min:24sec – 1h:18min:53sec đ ):
Question : If that answer doesn't come or we don't perceive it?
Bivolaru : No, it is impossible not to perceive it . Please don't be fooled here. If God answers, we perceive, we realize. God has available the means that He has in His omnipotence to make us understand that He agrees.
If not, nothing at all appears.
But as soon as he says this, he contradicts himself and suddenly admits that the answer may not be clear, but in doubt:
conference on Consecration , August 1995 , CostineÈti (1h:18min:54sec – 1h:19min:40sec đ ):
Question : Is it possible that although an action is integrated, we do not perceive the response from the Divine?
Bivolaru : No, it is impossible. To be sure, if you have any doubts that you did not notify, do it two more times, after you have made the first consecration. And if to all these three there is no response, no high, transfiguring reaction, sublime, then it is clear that there is no answer and therefore our consecration, although it was made, God does not accept these fruits that we want to offer him, and therefore he does not support us, our action is not integrated in God.
" It's impossible, but if you have doubts, to be sure, repeat again... " To repeat the doubts, to be sure?
How clear and precise the answer to consecration is, is illustrated by a question from a student attending the conference:
conf . about Consecration , August 1995 , CostineÈti (1h:37min:07sec – 1h:39min:41sec đ ):
Question : How can we awaken our ability to perceive the response to such a consecration?
Bivolaru : Know that this capacity exists in each of you. I would really like to check now, about this matter: If there was someone in this room who, to this exemplification that I made related to this answer, did he perceive absolutely nothing in response to this consecration that I made by way of example? Please raise your hand...
from the hall : ... something nebulous!
Bivolaru : That "something nebulous" is exactly the answer! So that "nebulous something", if you are always going to perceive it, that something, when you consecrate, it means that this is the answer. As you always consecrate, it will appear more and more clearly.
But that something is exactly the answer. And to be sure, whenever you consecrate and that nebulous something appears, that "I don't know what and I don't know how", as Eminescu said, that mystery will be exactly God's answer.
Somebody else [...]. Well, that state of internalization is that something! Well this is it! It's internalization, right? But it was concurrent with that answer, right?
Well, that state of internalization is the answer from the Divine and each one, according to his possibilities, but something appears.
But not that it's nothing, nothing. When there is nothing, when nothing appears, no response, then yes. It was something that was special, uplifting.
Was that internalization something special? Calm down! So here, there was something special, there was nothing equal to make you say "it's exactly like before, nothing appeared!"
"So this is the clear and precise answer: that nebulous something, that je ne sais quoi ! So anyone else? So you felt like shooting winds at the time of consecration? So it was concurrent, right? So then this is the answer! So one is calm, the other feels good to draw winds! So each according to his possibilities. So you can't say there was nothing, nothing!"
But it is not only the vagueness of perceiving the Divine's response that is problematic. From the moment the practitioner considers that he has received the consent of the Divine for the action he has consecrated, he tends to consider that the way he intends to carry out its action has already been accepted, whatever that will be ("received a blank check"). Thus, throughout the action, the practitioner is no longer attentive to how he performs that action, to his inner attitude, or to moral aspects.
Even if the answer were genuine and clearly perceived, it is necessary to maintain a spiritual attitude throughout the action, that it may be fruitful, and that its fruits may be pure.
An answer received from the beginning must not make the consecrator act without a spiritual attitude, mechanically, formal, reluctant, thing done just to be done and above all not to be diverted by selfish interests, which transforms the action in an immoral one. Bivolaru himself draws attention to this aspect đ :
Not wanting selfishly and no longer fearing the results of the completely detached actions that we are going to carry out in quality of divine instruments; not to be selfishly attached to that action at all while doing it detachedly; not here during the action and not afterwards let's not consider ourselves as the author of the action at all, but the instrument in and through which God manifested and continues to manifest.
The last three points, if misunderstood or misunderstood, can easily lead to total SELFISH disinterest in the action itself that we will then perform superficially, in a hurry, "it doesn't matter how" because now we are no longer responsible.
Or, this is the exact opposite of what the practice of karma yoga actually is. Karma yoga actually imposes on the one who practices it a much increased responsibility. And this is evident in two directions:
– The difficult responsibility from which it is impossible for us to avoid, taking refuge behind a dogma or a law, to always choose from all the possibilities that present themselves the one that best meets our ideal the highest, divine, of the moment;
- The obligation to execute, although completely detached, the action, whatever it may be, with all the mastery of which we are capable.
This implies that, between the moments devoted to visible detached action, it is necessary to intersperse moments of reflection, of consecration to the divine and of rest necessary to fulfill these two conditions as best as possible.
Bivolaru draws attention to the lack of responsibility in action through selfish disinterest, but does not mention anything about the other possibility: the petty selfish interest hidden behind the "blank check" given by the Divine, manifested through the attitude often found at MISA and expressed by the saying "the end justifies the means": "by lying to the truth, by manipulation for a good cause,
through the rascals to the goal!”
For example, to support, argue and justify the attitudes promoted within the movement, propaganda and manipulation are used, fake news is widely used.
MISA's stances and outward manifestations are hypocritical and lying, inconvenient truths are denied and hidden.
For example, before the broadcasting of propaganda and manipulation conferences, the "consecration" is carried out.
All this contradicts the attitude required by the spiritual tradition: total dedication, from the heart, continuous vigilance regarding the moral purity of the intentions and the way of carrying out the action, for its ENTIRE DURATION, until the end.
Because the practitioner in the traditional spirit does not seek an affirmative answer from the beginning for the whole action, he does not consider from the beginning
that the Divine will accept whatever way the action is performed and whatever fruits will result, he will be attentive and considerate throughout it , to preserve both the fruitfulness of the action and the purity of the fruits that will result until the end.
Man retains his free will at all times, therefore it would be necessary to perceive the consent of the Divine AT ANY TIME during the course of the action, be permanently an instrument through which God acts.
If he is not able to do this at the moment, he should at least be aware at every moment that he is performing an action whose fruits he offered to the Divine in the beginning, let him be careful not to manifest a tendency to appropriate these fruits to himself and take care to respect the moral rules during the action.
Instead, the attitude of MISA is that "the Divine received from the beginning the fruits as they will be, HE will be satisfied with anything, no matter what, no matter what", an expression of the Romanian attitude "that's how it goes; what will come out, that's it, be detached!”
The danger is when moral deviance occurs, when actions are directed towards the fulfillment of petty ends.
Thus, under the cover of the "initial affirmative answer to the consecration", all kinds of villainy are committed at MISA.
The MISA practitioner who "consecrates to the Divine the fruits of his action", offers only an INTENTION, for he has no way of knowing nor can it guarantee how the action will play out, whether it will produce fruit and what kind of fruit will be generated.
Then the guru comes and says: "You do not know how it will be, but God knows everything in advance, and since HE has accepted the fruits, it means that everything will be without error". It is the perfect argument behind which the attitude "the end justifies the means" can be hidden.
An "affirmative response to consecration", if it really exists, may mean that "the intentions are good", but it cannot guarantee that everything will be perfect until the end. It's like God saying "the intention is good, do as you wish!", which is equivalent to "The end justifies the means". Furthermore, man has free will and his attitude can be fluctuating.
A well-programmed robot can guarantee flawless action in its entirety, but a human driven by free will and who can change attitude during the action, cannot give guarantees. It would mean that free will is suspended, that man becomes a robot.
The mode of action "do as you like, because you do good anyway" destroys both moral sense and common sense, hardens both the mind and the heart.
Let's compare the MISA philosophy with Christ's teachings: " I want mercy , but not sacrifice " (Matthew 12:7) or
I was hungry and you gave Me something to eat; I was thirsty and you gave Me to drink; I was a stranger and you received Me;
I was naked and you clothed Me; I was sick and you examined Me;
Then the righteous will answer Him, saying: Lord, when did I see You hungry and feed You? Or thirsty and I gave you something to drink?
Or when I saw You as a stranger and received You, or naked and clothed You?
Or when I saw You sick or in prison and came to You?
And the King, answering, will say to them: I tell you the truth, since you did to one of these brothers of mine, too little, You did it to me . (Matthew 25:35-40)
In other words, Jesus - whom Bivolaru calls "our divine model" - says that actions based on compassion and mercy they are, by their very nature , actions performed for God. It does not speak of any formal consecration of the fruits of action to HIM,
but says that whatever springs from a pure heart, full of love and compassion, means fruit offered to Him.
Paraphrasing a saying of Jesus, what is more pleasing to God:
"Lord, I consecrate to You the fruits of my meditation for the protection of the planet Earth" ( by which I invoke You to do all the work ) or "God help me in my continuous effort to contribute to the support of this orphanage"?
Those at MISA invoke all kinds of Divine Attributes in all kinds of programs to support some goals they pursue, and if these are fulfilled, they declare them as "a result of the school's actions"!
This means appropriating the fruits and merits of the actions that God accomplished and which, the faces, were in the beginning offered to God! They are like the Pharisees who ate the offerings given to God in the temple.
These are the results of the practice of consecration at MISA!
The same happens with "karma yoga". MISA encourages voluntary activities, but only for the benefit of MISA.
They exhort and they still appropriate the fruits!
Bivolaru also stated that the response to consecration lasts a short time and that the feeling of divine integration of the action what is perceived during its performance is not consecration:
conf . about Consecration , August 1995 , Costinesti (1h:59min:40sec – 2h:00min:15sec đ ):
Question : Many times, this responsive state of divinity comes to me spontaneously, even when I do not perform the consecration.
Is it considered consecration?
Buffalo : No. It is not considered consecration, because consecration is regarded as consecration only when we offer the fruits of our action to God and God answers us. That we feel that God is helping us, I told you before, this does not mean that we consecrated the fruits of our actions and that God received them.
That is, "it doesn't matter that you do good deeds, if you didn't offer them, with your mouth, before. It is the word and not the deed that counts.
The important thing is to offer with your mouth and after that you can put your feet in".
conf . about Consecration , August 1995 , CostineÈti (2h:00min:52sec – 2h:01min:26sec đ ):
Question : Is it enough to make consecration and then maintain it through awareness?
Bivolaru : Know that consecration through awareness cannot be maintained because it, after we receive the answer, it fades and even disappears. After that, the integration is manifested again in the course of the action. There are two distinct aspects.
As you have seen even in this exemplification now, you have noticed that the answer from the Divine is one and after that the response that occurs during the action is something else. There are two distinct aspects.
Of course they are distinct! Word and deed are always distinct! That's what Jesus said:
And He said to them: Isaiah prophesied well about you hypocrites, as it is written:
"This people honors Me with their lips, but their heart is far from Me". (Mark 7:6)
The problem is not the consecration formula before the action (which includes, in addition to the attitude of offering, the intention and plan of action), but the fact that the ACTION and especially the ATTITUDE during its realization DOES NOT CORRESPOND with what was offered!
"Delivery" is different than "offer"!
conf . about Consecration , August 1995 , CostineÈti (1h:32min:38sec – 1h:32min:58sec đ ):
Question : However, with situations, with spontaneous consecration...
Bivolaru : Spontaneous consecration situations are crazy. There is no spontaneous consecration. The consecration is as I have shown you, and so it must always be done. It is not possible to have spontaneous consecration.
"There is no attitude as an instrument by which God acts, there are only empty words about it!" This is the promoter of tantric spontaneity!
conf . about Consecration , August 1995 , CostineÈti (1h:55min:20sec – 1h:56min:11sec đ ):
Question : In the case of an action that occurs spontaneously, without us being prepared, can we do the consecration during the action?
Bivolaru : No, know that the consecration cannot be done during the action. We must always make the consecration only before the action.
I told you and I repeat. At most, in such situations, we can quickly offer the fruits of that action to God, it is all we can do in case of lightning actions.
But it is always good to beware of these spontaneous actions and to seek to distinctly consecrate the fruits of those actions to God, then let's wait for the answer and only then act.
"Avoid
spontaneous actions. Before any step, you stop and say the formula. If you do
it with your heart, it doesn't matter.
What you do with your mouth is the real action! If the grandmother fell into
the water, do not immediately jump into the water, but do the consecration
first, and if you get the answer in the affirmative, only then jump into the
water and bring her body to shore!
If you saved grandma without first verbally offering the save action, you're loading up on grandma's karma! If you fell into the water and go to the bottom, when you see the others standing on the shore and doing the consecration, be detached!"
"The formalism is essential, the dead letter is important, the ritual is everything; spirit and soul must be avoided, they lead to involvement. Detach yourself!”
Saying fixed formulas and invocations at every step is more like practicing sorcery and magic. Therefore, it is not surprising that the habitual mentality and distorted visions are found at MISA.
Bivolaru's statement before the French court, as if he "engaged" in the sexual act with the students after the "consecration", perfectly illustrates the imaginary world in which he lives. From his point of view, what happened at his "initiations" is something divine.
The sincere practitioner has only to consecrate the fruits of his action through the prescribed formula and then proceed to perform the action, but constantly taking care that the action is as fruitful as possible, its goals are moral, and his attitude to be that of a divine instrument as pure as possible, being aware that he remains responsible until the end of the action.
Incidentally, Bivolaru realized this at some point and, after saying at the beginning that the initial response to the consecration accomplished before the start of the action it frees the one who acts from karmic ties, afterwards - after 20 years! - came and completed specifying that, in the case of actions that last several days - such as for example Tapas - it is necessary to repeat consecrating the fruits of the action EVERY DAY, at the beginning of the day or before resuming the action!
How so? Doesn't the All-Knowing God know in advance how the action will evolve to its end? Of course he knows!
The practitioner is the one who does not know, his attitude is the one that can change from one moment to the next, because he constantly has complete freedom of choice. He needs to be constantly aware and evaluate, again and again, his attitude!
In 2015, 20 years after the first conference with the consecration, Bivolaru comes and introduces a "new" rule:
conf. Consecration part 2 , response to tickets, 2015 (06 min:14 sec – 10 min:34 sec đ ):
Bivolaru : We also want to specify that, always without exception, the consecration of a certain action to which I received a clear, affirmative answer, it lasts exactly from the moment I completed the respective consecration, for 24 hours and for this it is important to calculate your 24 hours in advance so that you do not find yourself exceeding be it even by 10 minutes, be it even by 3 hours, etc. that time interval.
Because it is essential to never lose sight of the fact that the consecration of the fruits spans only 24 hours.
Therefore it is absurd, it is wrong to imagine that if you have achieved consecration for a certain Tapas at the beginning, when you start that Tapas, it implies not doing the consecration at all afterwards, because it is wrong to make the consecration once and then every day to perform the Tapas, mistakenly considering that the consecration which you did it then in the beginning is enough. It's not like that at all. The consecration of that Tapas can be done globally at first and then the said consecration is repeated day by day, before you begin the Tapas.
First of all, man must be aware and responsible 24 hours a day, not "every 24 hours"!
But Bivolaru cannot tell followers that they are responsible for their actions and attitude from moment to moment, because that would make him dust his theory of consecration and furthermore would make the followers be forced to be more moral and not just listening robots, swallow and blindly execute the guru's donuts.
And then he puts it in with the resumption of the consecration every day, which is the repetition of a formal, mechanical ritual that becomes more mechanical and more formal with each repetition, accentuating the soul and spiritual hardening.
At the 1995 conference, Bivolaru declared (audio đ 35min:19sec – 36min:33sec):
"We feel how it enters through the crown and causes our being to be flooded with this flow of grace, which is the answer that what we I have offered as fruit, it is accepted by God. This state confirms to us that this consecration is fruitful and then we are sure that the action we will do after that is inspired by God, is supported by Him , belongs entirely to Him, we being only the instrument through which God's power is manifested and God is the one who benefits.
The fruits belong to Him, both those that will follow in an hour and those that will follow in 5 years, 10 years, 100 years, 200 years, 800 years; all these fruits are wholly His."
In 1995, Bivolaru was "certain that the action is inspired by God, it is supported by Him, it belongs entirely to Him".
In 2015, "God" changed his mind: he receives all the fruits at the beginning of the action, but he also wants reconfirmations every 24 hours!
Barrage question for the great spiritually realized and omniscient lord: how is it possible for God to accept the fruits at the beginning of a Tapas, and after some weeks of answering affirmatively every day, not to answer one day, which causes the Tapas to cease to be performed on that day, thus to be stopped altogether before it is performed?
Knowing Bivolaru and those from MISA, they would say: "Come on, God won't deny you the fruits of a Tapas!" And then, if it is certain that he will not refuse them, why is there a need to repeat the consecration every day? Is it not enough to consecrate the entire action from the beginning? Apparently not!
God is not obliged to swallow the continuation of an action that is no longer carried out with a spiritual attitude, generating miserable fruits.
Even the guru clarified this, I quote:
the conference on Consecration , 1995 (audio đ 1h:25min:01sec – 1h:26min:40sec):
Question : Please tell us about these cases where we are sure that we have consecrated and are integrated, but it is not so.
Bivolaru : Know that this foolish security of ours has nothing to do with true integration.
We can be sure, but let's remember that it is not by chance that they say: "Man proposes and God disposes".
We cannot be sure in advance that God will receive whatever we offer him . But to be sure before we have this answer, it is foolishness and does not save us from the error of thinking that we are integrated by this offering of the fruits of our actions
and, in reality, this did not happen.
So, according to Bivolaru, it is necessary to repeat every day the consecration of the fruits of actions that last more than 24 hours and one cannot know for sure, from the beginning, that God will accept the fruits offered each day.
But here the question returns: does God, being omniscient, not know in advance how the action will evolve until its end?
This contradiction shows that the method of consecration, as given by Bivolaru, cannot be correct and that it is bullshit.
It cannot be said that God accepts from the beginning the fruits of the action throughout its duration, however it may be this done and, at the same time, to state that it is necessary to "reconfirm the confirmation" every 24 hours!
If all the fruits of the action were accepted from the start by the Divine, it would mean that the doer of the action would somehow be determined to act perfectly for the duration of the action - like a perfectly programmed robot - and no longer has the possibility to change its attitude, that is, his free will is suspended for the duration of the action.
In reality, God does not give blank checks, everyone is responsible for the duration of his action and is not a priori absolved from karma.
Everyone is obliged to always see to it that their actions are, at every moment, divinely integrated both in terms of how the action and its goals are performed, as well as regarding the attitude with which the person who performs it acts. In this way, the free will of the one acting is respected for the ENTIRE DURATION of the action.
The idea of consecrating the fruits of the whole action from the beginning cannot possibly be valid. There cannot be such a method, but one can speak at most of an integration of the "moment of the beginning".
Thus one can understand why Krishna revealed the necessity of consecrating the fruits of beneficial actions, but did not give a specific method: there can be no "method"! Bivolaru's claim that the god Krishna revealed the purpose of the Karma Yoga path thousands of years ago and only after many millennia, he came - the Great Avatar from DĂąmboviÈa - to show the method, it is embarrassing.
Just as there can be no technique of loving, so there can be no technique of being the instrument of divinity. You either have the state of divine relay or you don't. If you don't have it, you have to make efforts to acquire it, but it cannot be the result of a technique, just as being in love cannot be the result of a technique!
The state of divine relay is acquired gradually, through practice, and until you acquire it you must always be attentive and responsible. If the state of divine relay is maintained from the beginning to the end during an action, only then can it be said that the doer does not accumulate karma. That is why the Divine reserves the right to refuse to support another action if this is no longer fulfilled in an appropriate way.
Being convinced that the Divine received from the beginning the fruits of the whole action and that therefore he agrees to its realization, the MISA practitioner no longer questions the divinely integrated attitude and thus loses the sense of morality.
Thus it came to the consecration of all kinds of vile actions, pretending that the consent of the Divine was received.
For example, the female students consecrate the fruits of the activities on the porn video chats, although Bivolaru himself declared (once upon a time) that "exhibiting private parts for a fee is fornication". So fornication is consecrated to the One who commanded "Thou shalt not commit fornication!"
You realize what was in the mind and soul of practitioners who had done Tapas for years and consecrated only the fruits of each day, globally, but they had not known that the fruits of Tapas must be consecrated anew, every day. Yoga taken out of the belly, a la Bivolaru Marele Eliberat!
That's how the Great Esoteric gave it to the bar and with the hiatus (article 1 đ , article 2 đ , audio đ ).
Imagine the following scene from the Last Judgment:
God : My Nectaria, I know that you have dedicated your whole life to helping orphans and the elderly, I would like to send you to heaven, but you have a problem! When you were giving help and care, you were always past midnight, and because of those minutes you entered the next day you have loaded yourself with all the karma of those you helped during the day, so I have to send you to hell, that the rule is the rule, esotericism is more important than close love and, another time, learn to mind and you should have gone too to my son's classes, Grig!
The idea that "the validity of the consecration lasts exactly 24 hours from the moment of its realization, no more, no less" appears as a Bivolaru quibble for another reason: the interval of exactly 24 hours has no esoteric meaning, being about an artificially established time interval, for practical reasons.
The day represents the time interval which, being expressed by a whole number of hours (24), is the closest in size of the actual duration of an astronomical day (sidereal day) - 23 hours 56 minutes 4 seconds - i.e. the duration of a complete rotation of the Earth around its axis. The interval of exactly 24 hours is therefore conventionally chosen, for purely practical reasons, and is expressed in units
- 24 hours x 60 minutes x 60 seconds - which can be measured as such only with the help of precision mechanical or electronic watches, which were not accessible in ancient times dating back to the millennial esoteric and spiritual tradition.
The rule "don't exceed 24 hours even by ten minutes!" cannot be part of the traditional millennial teaching, especially since, until recently, people did not have the possibility to measure time with such precision.
The only sure landmarks were the rising and setting of the Sun. Otherwise, the time was ESTIMATED with approximation.
This fact calls into question the "authenticity" of the Svara system taught by Bivolaru which, in turn, requires precision electronic clocks and for this reason it could not be applied in antiquity.
Since it is Svara Yoga, the duration of a complete cycle is comprised between the sunrise moments of two consecutive days (solar day), but it is not exactly 24 hours either, since the Sun rises at a different time every day!
The rule - if there is such a rule from an esoteric point of view - should sound more like this:
the consecration of the fruits of an action is valid for the duration of a tattvic cycle, which is comprised between the rising moments of the Sun from two consecutive days.
Yoga at MISA/ATMAN is ritualistic and mechanistic, everything is done on the clock at exact times, with exact magical formulas, with invocations and fixed incantations, taken as if from the Harry Potter movies (Harry Olaru). Above all reigns BivOlaru, with his magic wand!
Speaking of the "magic wand" with which BivOlaru casts spells and "gives initiations", the consecration problem gets complicated when the action
it is done in two, obviously it is about "love fusions" and especially about "tantric initiations". But about these in the next post.
Consecration of joint actions and free will
If the consecration of the fruits of an individual action raises so many questions, the more complicated is the consecration the fruits of a joint action, which is carried out simultaneously by several people.
First, unison is necessary both in the action itself and its purpose, and in the response of the Divine to the consecration.
In the case of an act of love performed as a couple, it takes two, so both must receive an affirmative answer, it does not make sense that one to receive an affirmative answer and the other no.
conf. Consecration , 1995 (1h:59min:13sec – 1h:59min:35sec đ ):
Question : It is possible that, before a love fusion, in the consecration of the fruits of the divine, one of the lovers will receive an answer,
and the other one not, right?
Bivolaru : It is not possible . At most, both should notice that this consecration is not received , the fruits are not accepted.
new conference on Consecration , part 2 , August 2015 (audio đ 43min:16sec – 51min:25sec):
Bivolaru : It is fundamental, it is essential that the two lovers receive - each of them - an affirmative answer beforehand .
In the case of the victim named Nathalie whose account appears in the German podcast Toxic Tantra, she clearly testifies that, in the case of her sexual "initiation" in Paris by guru Bivolaru, the fruits of the sexual act were consecrated to the Divine, but she did not want to be sexually initiated by the guru and, fearing his reaction, avoided telling him this,
which was interpreted by Bivolaru in the sense that the woman would have received an affirmative answer to the consecration from the Divine.
Since the sexual act followed, it follows that Bivolaru would also have received an affirmative answer because, as he himself claimed, the sexual act can only take place if both partners receive an affirmative answer .
But the hypothesis of receiving an affirmative answer to the consecration by Bivolaru contradicts the account of the German student, which testifies to a negative answer which, according to Bivolaru's statements in the previous passages, is not possible.
At this point, the question arises: is it possible that the woman received an affirmative answer for sexual initiation, as she leaves to understand Bivolaru, although she did not want this? In this case, what is free will?
Nathalie : From my point of view, it's not a "YES" if I'm too afraid to say "NO".
Obviously there was no way Nathalie would receive such an affirmative answer to an action in which she did not want to take part.
And if she had been led to believe that she had received an affirmative answer even against her will, then she would not have emphasized on the guru's abuse, but would rather have asked " why do I feel so miserable, since God showed me that action is divinely integrated? Did I perceive wrongly, did I not understand correctly? "
➤ It is possible for God, by an affirmative response to the consecration of the fruits of an action, to prompt a human being to perform that action against her will ?
If God's answer were YES when man would like it to be NO, and therefore man acts against his desire, if the result of the action does not satisfy the man, then the DOUBT in him amplifies:
"I did as God wants, but then why am I not well? Wouldn't it be better if I did as I wanted?”
In such a case, the person dissatisfied with the result will tend to blame God.
This way of acting would not help man to evolve spiritually, but on the contrary, it would make him move away from HIM.
The question above can be nuanced:
It is appropriate to offer to God the fruits of an action that in reality we do not want to achieve or the necessity of which or even morality do we doubt? Would God accept the fruits of an action done with laziness or doubt in the soul?
Imagine you are at a restaurant and the waiter/waitress shoves your plate of food away with lehamites or even disdain. Or another situation, in which the waiters practically throw your plate on the table, with an expression on their face like "it's in your throat!"
Good appetite!... This is probably what God would feel in the case of consecrating the fruits of an undesirable or foolish action.
Of course, there are also actions that are not very desired by the spiritual aspirant, but which would be for his good, such as austerities (Tapas, fasting, etc.). But even in this case the same kind of question arises:
God accepts the fruits of an action and sustains that action if it is done without aspiration and without reluctance, with the feeling of accomplishing an unwanted action or even silence?
What happens if the idea of performing the respective austerities does not come from the aspirant, but from the "master"?
Even if such austerities are necessary, are they effective if they are not carried out willingly?
Would God gladly accept the fruits of such actions?
God, in His wisdom, leaves man to choose for himself first, so that he takes responsibility for his actions so that, by the consequences - good or bad - that arise, he realizes the nature of his will.
If the consequences of his actions are good, man will be attracted, stimulated and encouraged in carrying out such actions.
If the consequences of his actions are bad, from the sufferings arising from his wrong actions, man will learn that those actions are bad and will avoid doing them in the future.
If the action carried out on his own initiative fails, then man will no longer have the tendency to blame God for his own failure.
From the lessons learned as a result of his own experiences, man will be stimulated to strive to acquire first spiritual discernment, that is, to become able to distinguish from the beginning - from the stage of intention - the nature of his actions and thus choose ALONE, in full knowledge of the cause, what is good, then he will offer it to God with joy
the fruits of a beneficial action which he has chosen to perform fully freely and enthusiastically, and God will sustain him.
It is essential that man learn by himself, from the consequences of his actions and be stimulated to choose, of his own free will, the path without suffering.
He will end up orienting himself - forced by circumstances and not by someone else - to the actions that bring good fruits, he will choose them by himself and, very importantly, he will thus understand why he makes that choice.
Through right choices, man will not only gain the benefits of his good deeds, but also WISDOM!
This is the true LIBERATION, not that of telling the man at every step what he should do, in which case the man would only be an unconscious and blind servant!
WISDOM is the aptitude or ability to understand the nature of things and actions in creation and therefore to discern over them.
According to the Law of Resonance promoted and even trademarked at MISA, every intention to act connects it the one who intends to the source of the corresponding energy. Therefore, it becomes necessary for man to come to discern in his heart whether the manifestation of clear and firm intention is accompanied by a positive or negative vibration.
Moreover, Bivolaru always draws attention to the importance of clear and firm intention in the practice of yoga.
And then how to consecrate to God the fruits of an action that you are not even sure you want to do?
So, first is the choice, then the clear and firm intention, then comes the consecration, which will establish, through the answer received at the consecration of the fruits of the action, if the action intended to be carried out is integrated at that moment.
For these reasons, neither God nor any genuine spiritual master will urge or seek to persuade a spiritual aspirant to proceed to perform actions that the aspirant hesitates to perform.
What Bivolaru does in the case of the victims' accounts is influence and manipulation in the sense he wants, but which is against the desire of his victims. God had no way of approving these sexual acts at first sight, by answering affirmatively to the consecration,
especially since the commission of these acts resulted in mental suffering and trauma. How can suffering be a sign of divine integration?
Bivolaru would say at this stage: the one who revealed the consecration - Krishna - urges Arjuna to go to battle against his kinsmen, even if Arjuna is reluctant or even unwilling to fight.
But Krishna first proves to Arjuna the righteousness of his fight, which is in accordance with his Dharma, for he belongs the warrior caste and if he does not oppose evil, evil would triumph and conquer the world.
So first Arjuna is rightly convinced of the divine integration of action, then he freely chooses to fight and offers the fruits of action to Krishna.
But Bivolaru, on what grounds is he trying to convince the students to accept the sexual act with him, despite their disgust?
If they let themselves be raped, will they burn off their karma and experience a huge spiritual leap? Then where is the jump, if the respective have they suffered, left with trauma and "left the spiritual path"?
"It's their ego, it's their demons that oppose their spiritual evolution and make them fail the spiritual tests!", they will say in chorus both the abuser and the henchmen. But then why did they hide the true purpose of the trip from the victims, they promised them in advance
that everything will be fine and that everything will only be according to their free will đ ?
➤ Is it helpful for the spiritual aspirant to ask for approval every step of the way , like an oracle?
If God would answer man's every question and show him what to do BEFORE he was able to discern and choose to perform an action, man would become just like a robot: he would perform the actions perfectly from the external point of view, but inwardly blind. This is not liberation, it is slavery.
Unless the apprentice learns and becomes able to perform each operation to perfection by himself, he will not become a master.
So God will first let man choose for himself, learn and become able to feel what is the right action, then it will support him in carrying out the correct actions, integrated in the divine harmony.
More opinions on this can be read here
https://falseguru.wordpress.com/2014/07/12/consacrarea-ca-metoda-de-indoctrinare/
The ones exposed so far refer to those situations that every human has the ability to discriminate and choose..
But in life there are also choices with terrible implications, in risky situations, the consequences of which cannot be foreseen by the average person.
In such situations, an answer from the Divine, who knows the future, would be truly invaluable.
Genre Choices: Rejecting the treatment and surgery your doctor advises you to have to remove the galloping cancer what happened or to opt for the "treatment" with plants that the "spiritual guide" insists on?
Hit the road on your scheduled car trip?
By the way, if the response or lack of response of the Divine to the consecration of the fruits of the action indicates whether the action is good to be done, respectively, it is not good to be carried out, why have there been serious accidents resulting in casualties at MISA đ ?
How is it possible that three people with positions in MISA did not correctly perceive, at the same time, the response to the consecration đ ?
Even in MISA's reply to Le Monde it says, I quote:
In the message sent by Gregorian Bivolaru, the main idea did not refer to a possible apology,
but precisely to warn everyone about the need to be extremely careful and responsible for everything they do and not to "sleep on one ear" with the naive idea that they are "chosen" because they are on a spiritual path.
The yoga practitioners of the MISA school know very well that the mentality of an aspirant on the spiritual path is nowhere near that of being dependent on someone's advice and approval . Even in the courses of the first years of yoga, it is written and explained that the aspirant he must become more and more responsible and autonomous as he matures spiritually , and attention has an absolutely essential role.
It can be said that the entire yoga practice is oriented towards awakening a state of being as lucid and conscious as possible at every moment. đ
How are you not "addicted to approvals", if at every step you ask for an approving answer?
So those from MISA, at the head of the Guide, recognize the fact that, regardless of the response received to the consecration of the fruits of each action, the doer must remain fully alert and responsible at all times during the performance of the entire action.
But this means that it is implicitly recognized that there is always the possibility of "accidents", even in the conditions in which the Divine consent was received (since the action was taken).
This leads to the idea that, ultimately, God would have prompted some to perform actions that caused them to suffer because, if he had not received an affirmative answer, he would not have carried out the said action with dire consequences!
This is where Bivolaru's "logic" leads: the karma yoga practitioner is no longer karmically responsible for the consequences of his actions the fruits of which he has successfully consecrated, but still bears the consequences of the actions!
Another problem with the method of consecration presented by Bivolaru is that the response of the Divine is subtle and not exactly easy to perceive.
Why is this so? Possible explanations:
➤ The divine is the deepest aspect of Creation, a mystery difficult to fathom and therefore by their very nature, His manifestations are very subtle
But the Divine can manifest itself very visibly, as it does in the material world which is ultimately manifested also by His Will and Power. Why doesn't the Divine answer us in a way that leaves no doubt?
Why doesn't the Divine answer as in the Bible, in the form of a pillar of fire, with a thunderous voice from heaven or even by a hand that appears out of nowhere and writes a warning on the walls đ ? Bivolaru himself states, I quote:
conf . about Consecration , August 1995 , Costinesti (1h:16min:24sec – 1h:18min:53sec đ ):
Question : If that answer doesn't come or we don't perceive it?
Bivolaru : No, it is impossible not to perceive it . Please don't be fooled here. If God answers, we perceive, we realize.
God has available the means that He has in His omnipotence to make us understand that He agrees. If not, nothing at all appears.
But even within that conference, there were some who declared that they did not feel anything extraordinary, but calmness, internalization, "something nebulous" (see previous post).
The only natural answer is that although God can manifest himself very visibly, HE chooses to manifest himself in a subtle way so that, on the one hand, it leaves man the freedom to choose, and on the other hand, it stimulates man to make efforts to reach that spiritual height where the divine manifestations become very clear, but in addition the Will of God may be fully understood!
What would happen if God constantly manifested His Will visibly and to the spiritually blind?
✦ some would be shocked and scared (when the Divine manifests himself in the Bible, HE often starts like this: "Fear not!")
A "fear of God" would result, which would prevent closeness with love and dedication to HIM and cause an obedience full of fear, like that of a tyrant
✦ others would become fanatics and become tyrants (inquisitors, members of religious tribunals, supreme religious leaders, religious war-starting fanatics, etc.)
✦ others would become dogmatic, self-righteous, falsely pious (hypocritical) or full of blind obedience , conformists, would obey mechanically spiritual precepts, which is of no spiritual use to them.
From all this it follows that God always manifests himself in a subtly elevated way so that His Will is known only by those who understand it! By this, God implicitly respects man's free will!
God does not manifest imperatively against man's will, in the way "Do what I tell you and stop being so arrogant, demon that you are, because I know what's best for you!" thus robbing him of his freedom of choice and turning him into a slave submissive and blind, without any spiritual benefit to man.
In the 2nd part of the 2015 Consecration conference , Bivolaru says:
"Because of his perfect omniscience, God knows instantly what our real intentions are when we make up our minds to achieve the consecration of the fruits of a certain action. Moreover, God always knows precisely what will be next all the consequences, all the fruits of our deeds and at the same time God knows how great is our sincerity and dedication when we choose to offer Him and Him alone the fruits of that action of ours."
In the specific case of DAtY student Nathalie, God could not answer her in the affirmative, urging her to obey to a sexual act towards which she was initially disgusted, HE knowing this beforehand.
Therefore, he did not send his acceptance to the abuser either, who acted forced, blinded and driven by his abject instincts.
➤ sometimes the one who makes the consecration does not deserve to be answered
In his 2015 conference, in the part containing responses to tickets đ , Bivolaru asks if there is anyone who never receives response to the consecration, and after that he receives an anonymous note:
Question : I would like to know why some beings never get a response to the consecration, even though they do it correctly.
What I mean here is that I get no response to any consecration, regardless of the action they want to take.
Bivolaru : It is an important question. It is necessary to know that the human beings who are in this state have not yet knotted themselves the elemental, natural connection with God the Father. Such human beings have not yet established contact with the Divine in this life.
In some cases, there are also human beings who, due to the fact that they have failed one after another in certain important spiritual tests, due to the fact that they have slipped into demonic states, due to the obvious regression in which they are, such human beings are those
about which in the fundamental spiritual tradition it is said that, I quote "God turned his face away from them".
In certain millennial wisdom traditions, such human beings are called "lost beings".
Therefore, the confusion between " actions that should not be done " and " actions that never receive a response " should not be made.
A "lost being", who does not receive an answer even at the consecration of the table, must not understand that he must no longer work or even eat more, as would result if he mechanically followed Bivolaru's confused teachings.
In addition to the two previously mentioned categories, it must be said that there is a third "special" category:
"actions that should never be done, but which are still done, because they say " I receive an affirmative answer" from the "Divine"!
These actions include:
- "the affirmative answer received by the Spiritual Guide" to the consecration of the "sexual initiations" to which the "initiated" women I don't really want to take part
- the "affirmative answer received" by followers or instructors who take part in immoral or even illegal actions within MISA
- "the affirmative answer received" by the students who are active on porn videochats, although the "Spiritual Guide" also declared that the exposure of private parts for a fee is too fornicating, and the clients of the respective students masturbate and ejaculate in front of the screen, violating the principle of sexual continence, preached by Always the Same "Guide".
Therefore, the consecration of the fruits of the actions according to the way "revealed" by Bivolaru, raises big questions.
Although all spiritual traditions emphasize the necessity of good deeds and constantly and persistently urge the performance of good deeds, except the Bhagavad-Gita, no other spiritual tradition mentions the necessity of consecrating the fruits of good actions!
Moreover, even the Bhagavad-Gita does not provide a "precise, concrete technique" for realizing the consecration of the fruits of action!
If God exhorts man, in all ways, to the performance of good deeds, why does He not teach him that even good deeds bind him if they do not offer HIM their fruits?
If it is so important, why is the way to actually accomplish the consecration not provided?
Maybe because it is an eminently spiritual act that belongs to the depths of the spirit, not being appropriate a concrete way what would turn it into a mechanical action, into a formal ritual?
Bivolaru himself boasts of this, without realizing that in doing so, he reveals that his technique does not exist in the spiritual tradition:
conference on Consecration 2014 part 1 đ :
"It is essential to remember that for now, in the sphere of planet Earth, it is for the first time that the mysteries of the consecration of the fruits of God the Father are revealed in a simple, practical form, which can be of real use to all human beings."
In addition to the vague, subjective way of validating the allegedly objective result of applying the method of consecrating the fruits of actions to the Divine, in addition to the contradictions and ambiguities that have been shown, practical inadvertences also appear:
the conference on Consecration - 1995 :
Bivolaru : The mere activation of Sahashrara is not enough to allow us to say that it is God's answer, because this response does not occur only on Sahashrara. It engages all the centers from the navel to the Muladhara.
That it is not perceived as distinct and equal until Muladhara, that is something else. But know that it still feels proportional.
That is, we can feel Sahashrara 70%, Ajna 60%, Vishudda 50%, Anahata 40%, Manipura 20%, Swadhistana 10%,
Muladhara 5%, but it feels clear to all. It is like an outpouring of grace from the crown to the Muladhara.
the conference on Consecration 2014, part 1:
Bivolaru : When the answer comes, God answers us gradually, but the experience that appears in us when it pours out in full the second wave, causes a nuanced state to appear that settles quite quickly in our inner universe, especially at the level of centres of force, Sahasrara, Ajna chakra, Soma chakra, Vishuddha chakra, Anahata chakra and, somewhat rarely, Manipura chakra.
This complex response, which is endlessly nuanced, but which presents certain inimitable constants - we emphasize inimitable - it is perceived within our being, in the form of the second wave, which circulates the subtle sublime flows of energies
The Divine Attributes that diffuse in our being and sometimes flood us, especially at the level of the Sahasrara power centers,
Ajna, Visuddha, Anahata, rarely Manipura.
” The Revealed Secret of Consecrating the Fruits of Our Actions to God the Father – Episode 39 (video đ 08min:40sec)
"When our offering is accepted, we perceive the divine response in the form of an ecstatic and transcendent flow which comes from somewhere above the head and encompasses us, from top to bottom, our whole being ".
Up to Muladhara, only up to the level of Manipura, in the whole being!
Undecided "Guide"!
P.S. In the CostineÈti camp in 2014, Bivolaru launched an "update" of the consecration in which, before by saying the consecration formula, at least 21 times and a maximum of 27 times the formula " Lord God, have mercy on me" is said! "
That was the problem with the formula! Attitude doesn't matter...
The natural order of the "stages of the consecration technique" revealed in the planetary premiere by Bivolaru, should have been the following:
- identifying the goals that need to be met and the action that needs to be carried out to achieve the necessary results
- establishing the manner of carrying out the action
- analysis from a moral and spiritual point of view both of the goals pursued and of the way of action
- opting for an action that is both necessary and moral
- the clear and firm intention to carry out the chosen action on moral principles
- the consecration of the fruits of the chosen action
- perceiving the response to consecration
- moving on to carrying out the action that received an affirmative response from the Divine, giving up the one that did not receive a response
https://web.archive.org/web/20100822014810/http://www.krishna.go.ro/texte%20spirituale/KARMAYOGA.htm
https://yogaesoteric.net/definirea-sistemului-karma-yoga/
Official MISA :
https://misa.yoga/consecrarea/
https://yogaesoteric.net/raspunsul-oferit-de-biroul-de-presa-misa-cotidianului-francez-le-monde/
April 28, 2015 - "the new version of consecration"
https://yogaesoteric.net/unele-precisari-importante-cu-privire-la-consacrare/
The buffalo from "Animal Farm"
In previous posts, I have argued among other things that offering to the Divine the fruits of an action that is not desired or done wholeheartedly, it is inconceivable, for the fruits will be of the same nature.
Bivolaru himself shows what the attitude must be at the moment of consecrating the fruits to the Divine: spiritual openness, total sincerity.
Bivolaru : In order to be able to achieve consecration as well as possible, we must develop a state of total sincerity, because when we have no pretense and no hiding we can really feel the real answer which comes from GOD. It is important to realize that sincerity is a basic condition.
In fact, this sincerity refers to the inner attitude in which we have no way of hiding something in our hearts towards GOD. It is an inner attitude, which is often called honesty with one's own being. In fact, it is our sincerity in relation to GOD that is perceived as a living presence in our very inner universe.
That is precisely why, having this state, we will be able to give to GOD from the heart what we will achieve as an action. đ
Bivolaru : Swami Vivekananda pointed out in a very clear way that in fact karma yoga gives us maximum freedom.
He also adds: "the karma-yogi asks why we need another motive, other than the love born of freedom."
And this is how he explains it: "It is a difficult aspect to understand, but with time, you will realize that nothing in the Universe has full power over you so long as you do not allow that power to be freely exercised over you.” đ
Let us illustrate the action motivated by the "love born of freedom" as it exists at MISA, with an appropriate example:
Conference on " Evil Deeds of Demons ":
instructor message : Related to the 2nd year initiation into the Great Cosmic Kali Power, initiation which took place on March 27th. First the lessons about the Great Cosmic Power Kali were heard and taught. On that occasion the 2nd year students asked various questions and for them everything was fine.
In the evening of March 27, we did the practical part before the initiation, so that the students could prepare to be initiated. When we reached the initiation stage and were preparing for the consecration, a student told me that she did not want to receive the initiation. I was somewhat surprised, as it was the first time I had personally heard such a thing. I asked her on that occasion if she had any particular reason. He replied that she felt no resonance with the Great Cosmic Powers.
Bivolaru : Here it is necessary to point out the immense imbecility shown by the student when she made such a statement. It is worth asking, and it is worth asking herself, how it was possible for her to feel a resonance phenomenon with a cosmic power, before she had the opportunity to open her being and resort to an appropriate, specific way,
way that makes it possible to gradually discover a phenomenon of subtle sublime resonance with a certain cosmic power.
In the case of the student, the treacherous play of the demons was obvious.
Analogously speaking, we may ask: how is it possible for us to reject savoring honey from a full jar, is it because we feel no craving, no attraction, no resonance with honey?
But it is obvious to us that we do not have the curiosity to enjoy at least three spoons of honey, in order to clarify whether for us honey is or is not something strange that needs to be rejected forever.
In the case of this student's argument, we can see both the insidious influence of demons and the imbecility of her response.
Here, in this situation, she unconsciously collaborated with the demons playing in and through her being and launched this opinion - fundamentally a cretin - that she does not feel any resonance with the cosmic powers, but she would have had to ask herself, I quote:
"I feel no resonance with any of the great cosmic powers, but what have I done so far to feel
such a resonance with even one of these cosmic powers?” To such a question, her honest answer would have been, quote, "Well, I didn't do anything!" and then she would have had to continue asking herself, I quote: "Well if I didn't do anything to feel a phenomenon of resonance with at least one of the cosmic powers, how can I know, more precisely said, how can I cretinously assert that I feel no resonance with the great cosmic powers?
Here it becomes possible to discover a terrible vicious circle in which the student indulges. In her case, she was right IL Caragiale who, although he was not an initiate, said, I quote, "you can fight stupidity, but it almost always wins.”
Here it is necessary to point out the immense imbecility shown by the great "Spiritual Guide".
In the MISA courses, the great cosmic powers are not presented in the printed yoga courses (the 44 in each course year), but in separate printed materials, which are later handed to the learners.
Even the introductory materials (Introduction and Fundamental Key) do little more than say that the great powers there are 10 facets of the Divine and 10 aspects of the Cosmic Mother, which are then only listed and it is also said that these they can be contacted by awakening the corresponding focal points in the inner universe .
Kali is the first cosmic power, so the student was in first contact with this aspect related to tantrism (not yoga!).
I quote " previously the lessons about the Great Cosmic Power Kali were heard and taught ".
Therefore, she wouldn't have been able to do anything to feel if she resonated with even one of the great cosmic powers!
It's a terrible vicious circle in which the "student moron" is, but not in her mind, but in the mind of the real moron of this case, who doesn't even know the curriculum that he himself stole... developed.
Of course, even she couldn't tell right away whether or not she resonated with the great cosmic powers, but she had a first opinion on the occasion of the presentation of the first of these, Kali, whose image can hardly arouse the desire for communion, especially for a westerner.
According to the analogy of the great sage descended directly from Caragiale, if we must first enjoy three spoonfuls from the jar to find out what it contains, what will be the result if there is poison in the jar?
The creatures, no matter how hungry, will smell the contents before grabbing anything that looks like food. It's a kind of instinctive remote analysis that prevents them from ingesting anything that might be unpleasant or even harmful.
The same in this case: before receiving the initiation into a new deity, which is not part of the tradition of these lands, the student heard the presentation of the cosmic power Kali and probably she did not like what she heard and saw, that if she liked it she would have wanted to know it.
She would have been frightened by the traditional description: the black color, the rows of skulls around the neck, the worship in cemeteries and cremation grounds:
"She is for now the devouring Death, the merciless killer. Dancing victoriously upon a corpse, she is terrible and awe-inspiring, with his fierce teeth; a mocking smile always floats on his lips. Utterly empty and utterly impudent, like Time, The Black Lady, with her tongue hanging out from complete detachment from the continuous process of devouring, wears a string of skulls as a necklace."
That was not on the presentation posters at the opening conference of the yoga class that made the "imbecile" in question to enroll in MISA's yoga class. If instead of the attractive young woman undressed, MISA would put the traditional representation on the posters
of Kali đ , how many "morons and imbeciles" would still feel "resonance" with such a course and would enroll?
Speaking of the "intelligent" Bivolaru, by virtue of his "argument" from before, it turns out that you can't figure it out if you resonate with a certain aspect until you come in contact with that aspect, until you "taste" its content!
But what about evil forces? First, how can you know in advance that it is evil forces?
Then, is it advisable to contact them to see what their nature is?
The problem is that if you make contact with the infernal forces, you can hardly escape them!
So the thing with "first taste and then see if you resonate" doesn't work automatically, because you can get poisoned or burn...
Bivolaru criticizes the said student for speaking about cosmic powers before having contact with them, but he starts from the idea that these are eminently beneficial, a fact that was not obvious to the student either.
Of course, the know-it-alls at MISA, those who "understand everything" from the first hearing, will jump up with their clichés: that it is symbolism, that it should not be interpreted literally, that in fact Kali is not the goddess of death, but the transforming force of time blah, blah.
But look, not everyone "gets it", especially since this cosmic power is taught starting in the middle of year 2, so it's about basically beginner learners and you can't expect them to have who knows what deep vision of the universe.
In addition, at the opening conferences of yoga classes it is said that yoga is not a religion, that those with Christian beliefs they don't have to worry about being tempted to other religions, but look at a Hindu goddess being imposed on them in the 2nd year syllabus, which has in India a true religion!
If the great cosmic power Kali is sublime, then the student's refusal shows that she was not ready.
This situation, however, is the consequence of the organization of MISA courses as a "spiritual school", which - again - is not on the poster.
A program structured by study years was created, and the students of each year automatically receive what is provided in the program, without having to worry beforehand if they are really ready to receive the information provided to them.
And then why does Bivolaru get angry and congratulate the said student with sweet words like "imbecile"?
Who's the moron: the 2nd grader who should be learning arithmetic or the clumsy teacher who teaches them integrals?
The fact that the others did not refuse the initiation is not proof that they are superior to the respective student from a spiritual point of view, but only that they swallow unchewed what is put in front of them, proof of their lack of achievements.
Bivolaru continues:
In the present case, the abysmal stupidity shown by the student reveals, in parallel, a certain insidious influence of some demons what acts in and through her being, and you will be able to convince yourself that it is so and not otherwise from the instructor's account, which follows.
We quote further from the instructor's account:
"I told her that it would be best to do the consecration of the fruits of that initiation beforehand and then if the answer is clearly affirmative and positive, to choose to receive the initiation because God knows what is best for her, and if she does not receive the answer,
then she is entitled not to remain at this initiation. Moreover, I also reminded the other students of this aspect, namely that, if they do not receive the answer to the consecration, let them not remain at that initiation."
Another smart! As is the master, so is the apprentice: how to consecrate the fruits of an action that you do not want to carry out?
How would such a "consecration" sound?
"Lord God, I give you all the fruits of this action that I don't want to do.
I abhor this action, but if You like the fruits that will result, receive them as food that
I throw it away, because I don't like it."
And what would an eventual affirmative answer sound like, which would be possible by virtue of the master's teachings and the clever apprentice's ideas?
"I know that you are horrified by this action, but I like actions and fruits of this kind so that, even if you do not like it, I tell you to take this action, because I know better what is right for you."
Then where is free will or what is the point of free will?
It is one thing to ask about the nature of an action that is unclear to you, and another to ask about an action that you clearly do not like.
These spiritual tyrants do not understand that people have opinions different from their own and that they are free to choose what they think.
But by the way, if the student in question had listened to the clever instructor and had still achieved the "consecration" against her will, the consequence would have been, of course, the lack of an affirmative answer from the Divine, in which case the student would have left the room without receiving the initiation and she would no longer have been a "demonic imbecile", but an "obedient student, harmoniously integrated in the divine spiritual school".
Or, in this case, both the instructing servant and the all-wise Guide would have questioned the negative response to the repeated "consecrations" and would have accused the student of "demonic doubts"...
And the "demonic doubts" were deeply embedded in the soul of the "imbecile" because, as will be seen in the following, she had doubts not only about that initiation, but also about the method of "consecration", the great revelation in the world premiere of the foreman, which he also refused to make:
Bivolaru : We stop this testimony of the instructor, to inform you that only now follows the so-called bomb element of this Christian argument, which highlights the demonic influences that exist in this student. I quote the instructor's testimony again:
"She told me that she does not want to do the consecration because she does not want this initiation. I told her it would be better if she didn't demonstrate an egotistical and haughty attitude and reflect as necessary on this choice, on this decision.
She then told me that she had decided not to take this initiation and added that she was determined to leave the hall."
This is how MISA trainees are manipulated into not only doing actions against their will, but also immoral and even illegal actions: by the "consecration" method! In a previous post I showed the perverse and treacherous mechanism by which this manipulation is carried out:
➤ even before the "consecration", it was inoculated in the minds of the students that all the activities within the MISA courses are "divine":
The initiation into the great cosmic powers is "a phenomenon of subtle sublime resonance, it is the honey in the full jar".
If anyone has reservations about these actions, it is - only for him - "demonic doubts".
Thus, the students expect in advance that the answer of the "divine" to this kind of actions will be affirmative.
➤ the fixed formula is spoken and the answer is awaited
➤ the answer to all course activities should be a priori affirmative, beyond any doubt,
because these were declared from the beginning to be "divine".
But if any practitioner seems somehow to have received a negative response to the consecration, it means that he is not harmoniously integrated, he is the "black sheep", he is the "stupid and demonic imbecile" because, behold, the others have received an affirmative answer and this proves that the action is "divinely" integrated. I quote again:
"On that occasion, the students asked various questions and, for them, everything was fine."
Look, it wasn't all right for everyone! There were still some who remained in doubt!
➤ if, however, the hesitation persists, insert the plate with " God knows what is best for you ". But then why did God give free will to man, just so he could ask for permission? Where is the spiritual discernment?
It was as if the idea was for man to acquire discernment and become able to distinguish and choose the best possibility, which turns out to be the very Divine Will, just as the angels do.
Asking God at every step, without acquiring an elevated vision, can man ever evolve?
The answer to this last question can be seen in the level of evolution of those at MISA who, for anything, send the "Guide" the notes asking him for advice on everything đ (although the current MISA spokeswoman falsely denies this đ ).
Bivolaru : This situation with this student highlights, beyond appearances, the treacherous and cruel game of the demons that acted in and through this student's inner universe, causing her to take such a bizarre attitude, an attitude that showed that this being she does not go by the hand of God, as was suggested to her, but she goes by her own hand, more precisely she goes by the hand of the demons who they influenced her in a cunning way lest she accept this initiation, because by means of this divine spiritual initiation, the demons that act in and through her being and thus play their sinister games, would have been exorcised, would have been cast out and sent away, so to speak, out for a walk to find another poor human being as a coop to nestle in and stay.
Look where those who have transcended their egos and conceits sat! If you refuse to please them, you are egotistical and arrogant.
They " walk by the hand of God " and therefore, if you don't do as they say, you are demonic!
This is how these panarams who believe they are of divine origin consider the students: some "demon coops", good only to contribute and execute blindly and without scruples the "divine" wishes of the Parisian "rooster"!
Bivolaru : We continue the instructor's account, I quote:
"On that occasion, around that time, another student told me that she didn't want to receive the initiation either, at which point I told them, I emphasized that she should think carefully, and if this is her decision, she should also assume that no one will force her to accept
this initiation if she does not wish, and I added that she is free to leave the hall."
Bivolaru : This not accidental situation in which, immediately afterwards, another student from that group chose to proceed in the same way, it highlights a bizarre situation of evil, demonic induction that occurred through those demons that were operating in and through the being of the first learner, and that insidious evil influence immediately affected another learner, who was obviously receptive to such demonic influences and all of which pushed her, impeled her evilly to choose hodoronc-trunk so that she too will not receive said spiritual initiation. Here it is in this way, that demonic manifestation what appeared and manifested through a student's aura had an evil paranormal echo that immediately influenced her for evil the other student. In this way, the demons have, so to speak, hit two birds with one stone.
He who accepts whatever is thrown at him is an ardent spiritual aspirant and an exemplary disciple.
If, all the while, the student decides not to perform the maneuvers of the "right hand of God",
from the aspirant full of fervor as she was until a moment before, she suddenly becomes arrogant, "coop full of demons" and "creepy rabbit".
We are in the middle of "Animal Farm" đ , where the "recalcitrant chickens in the coop" have had enough and don't want to do what they want anymore to the heads of the Farm who, as we know, were pigs served by dogs! In this case, the Buffalo served by puppies!
Obviously, the second student was not completely influenced by the demons of the first, but by her refusal.
If she had been a "fervent aspirant", full of blind faith in the Farm Chief, then she would not have shown any refusal or hesitancy, as all the others who went to the cutting...initiation, without hesitation, did not hesitate.
It is clear, however, that she also had her reservations and doubts BEFORE the first student's refusal, but she did not have the courage to manifest them until that first refusal occurred.
Here you can see the herd spirit that manifests itself at MISA through the collective pressure of those around, which pushes some students to do things that, in fact, they do not want.