Interviews with ex-Misa followers

In a speech of Mihai Stoian admits that in the paradise of MISA/ATMAN there are a lot of negative things, contrary to the image of divine perfection that is displayed on the painted facade of the cult. But according to him, for the existence of these negative aspects, did not come from Bivolaru, but anyone else!

Mihai Stoian and Gregorian Bivolaru keep their followers in a state of confusion. A common trick used to control a cult. The followers need to show initiative and be creative while at the same time follow strict orders. No matter what they do, it is never good enough and they get endless lectures why they are not good enough and why they need to practice more because they are stupid. The pressure that Stoian and Bivolaru put on students and teachers is immense which creates fear and even more problems. The only way forward is leaving the cult.

Interviews with ex-Misa followers shows a remarkable picture: Contradicting what MISA/ATMAN/NATHA/TARA/etc is telling their followers, leaving this cult is NOT the end of your spiritual evolution. Ex-followers told that leaving this cult did actually empower them, revealing the truth that you need to learn to walk the path yourself, and that everyone has their own path. Misa followers often need to take oaths on their own health and spiritual evolution not to leave the cult or reveal any secrets. But those that did reveal that their mental and physical health improved and that their spiritual path took new and inspiring turns accelerating their personal evolution.
Teachers in Misa/Atman refer to their students as the kids, and that is exactly how they treat them, as kids so they stay kids. Smart parents treat their kids as grownups, give them responsibilities and praise them for what they do so they learn to grow up. Misa/Atman does exactly the opposite, they don’t want their followers to grown up and become independent because then they would leave the cult. They make sure the kids stay kids so they stay depended and never grow up. So they never praise them, only criticise like Stoian is doing. They never trust anyone to do the right thing, even if someone takes responsibility and trying to lead, immediately Stoian and Bivolaru will jump up and criticise them to take them down so being in the state of a kid again.
Once you leave the cult you experience growing up. You don’t need a guide yelling at you all the time. You discover your inner guide, your soul and the real God who is there to help you and encourage you.
Bivolaru is always describing a God like himself, someone who is constantly judging and punishing people. Trying to force people into being obedient slaves. Being humble is interpreted as being obedient. But really being humble has nothing to do with serving Bivolaru and his fake God. Being humble means you surrender to your real truth, the truth that sets you free, not enslaving you like in Misa.
Misa/Atman actively encourage the cult forming but they call it fraternity. By inventing an outer enemy: the free mason, illuminati, the media, satanic cabal, etc, etc, they increase the bonding inside the cult and increase the fear of the followers to leave the cult. The followers are not following a doctrine of fraternity but a doctrine of fear. But it is all based on fantasies. Non of the ex-Misa/Atman followers have ever been contacted by these enemies. They don't exist. The attacks by the media and the police in France are simply because ex-followers have been reporting the abuses in the cult.
Ex-followers also describe how the so called spiritual field and exemplifications of the cult keeps you trapped. It induces addictive spiritual and pleasurable states without actually helping you increasing your own spiritual capacity. It is like a drug, it keeps you trapped and by that it is designed to keep people trapped in the cult. You crave for more and more, increasing the addiction, but you never develop your own capacity to reach these states by your own power. Hence it makes students powerless.
The cult is trying to mould everyone into the same ideal follower having the mistaken idea that everyone needs to follow the same path, resulting in robotic behaviour and student parroting each other. Their ways are very forceful, not paying attention to the individual conditions of every student. Their forceful ways actually do a lot of damage and restricting the student so much that it prevents them from finding their own way to liberation.
Ex-followers describe their leaving of the cult as a liberating experience, coming to the understanding that they are actually doing fine and they discover their own unique qualities that were not visible under the regime of the cult. They get back their self-worth and inspiration to walk their own unique path to freedom.