A world
renowned MISA expert performed a comparative analysis of the ways MISA and the
ATMAN yoga federation operates in brainwashing their students. In this study
the different aspects of the consistent indoctrination and manipulation of
these yoga schools will be compared to the ways genuine spiritual traditions
work so it becomes obvious where this organisation violates the free will of
their students and keeps them trapped in a world of illusions and abuses.
It is of immense use to attentive, lucid, intelligent, full of common-sense and
endowed with spiritual intuition aspirants because this comparative analysis
helps them to discover the fraud at ATMAN and MISA.
The text here has been translated from
Romanian as it appeared on exmisa.blogspot.com
About DOUBTS and SPIRITUAL TESTS at MISA
The two
German journalists who made the recent "Toxic Tantra" podcast noticed
that one of the methods of psychological control widely used within the MISA
sect involves the so-called SPIRITUAL TESTS.
I quote
from the podcast:
Therapist : It still amazes me
how intelligence is undermined in this way. In other words, the fact that
people who actually have discernment and intelligence, end up in a
situation where they are somehow lost.
narrator : It's as if these smart women
have turned the common sense switch to "OFF" for the duration of
their participation at the yoga school. "Why didn't they just say
NO?" The psychotherapist says it can happen to anyone.
Therapist : If you're wondering
about that, then the doubts and resentments have always been there, and
the awareness of what it's not okay is then denied, because the
attraction is greater and because there are always arguments that nullify the
doubts.
Those who
were students of this "school" obviously had some doubts about the
"spiritual guide" and felt how they it manifests itself. Some
accepted them and immediately left the sect, while others struggled with them
for a while (doubted their doubts).
Obviously,
those who are students of MISA/ATMAN still suppress any doubts they may have.
One of
the insidious mechanisms for repressing doubts in followers is the
"fear of demonic doubts" and the fact that they can divert them
from the spiritual path and make them " definitely miss the only chance
for salvation ".
The
danger of "demonic doubts" is a true psychological blackmail, which
disqualifies the MISA leader as an authentic spiritual master because, stating
that the followers' doubts about him as a guide and about the activities and
actions of the school are "demonic", i.e. they are induced by demons
and represent resonances with demons, he implicitly asserts that he and his
school are infallible and divine, and the mere appearance of doubt itself is a
deadly danger and a grave signal of a possible descent into hell.
Of
course, doubts on a spiritual path are an undermining of spiritual efforts
because they produce an inner division but on the other hand, they are natural
as long as the practitioner has not reached a high level of consciousness and
clairvoyance which will allow him to be aware of the truth and to discern from
the start any situations.
In the
absence of a higher consciousness, the opposite of doubt is blind trust
, and this is as dangerous as doubt itself .
Blind
trust in an authentic master excludes true faith based on love and communion,
while blind trust in a false master leads to serious and irremediable error
(see here đ đ ).
A true
master knows that doubt is something natural and inevitable on the spiritual
path, and will never act on it of repression or, on the contrary, of the
amplification of the conflict within the aspirant.
Instead,
a false master, like Bivolaru, will seek to avoid or suppress "from the
front" the appearance of any doubt regarding him:
Bivolaru , message for
students:
Certain demonic doubts, persistent and strong, first dim and then make
the mysterious state disappear forever of paranormal,
ineffable communion with the SPIRITUAL GUIDE (written in capital
letters, na) đ
Bivolaru , message regarding the
leaving of the course by some instructors from BraÈov:
When some aspirants lose faith in the spirit guide, their vision of the
spirit guide darkens and changes, and that is
precisely why they can no longer benefit shortly thereafter from the gifts and
spiritual support that the spiritual guide offers them incessantly. In such situations, some
bizarre, even demonic influences appear in their being, which causes them to
modify themselves the vision or in
other words the point of view. đ
Of
course, doubt can SOMETIMES lead to wandering and leaving the spiritual path,
but it is still a naturally occurring situation (that is, it does not arise
from the will of one touched by doubt) and is inevitable on a spiritual path,
while its opposite - blind trust - it is always unnatural (it is the fanatic's
choice), it is false, and it ALWAYS leads to spiritual error. So it is a great
spiritual error to combat doubt with fear and inoculation of blind faith, as is
done at MISA.
Christian
practice recommends combating doubt through prayer, that is, by invoking divine
support ("strengthening"), through which a high spiritual experience
arises that brings more faith and weakens doubt.
Tantra,
on the other hand, simply recommends CAREFUL and DETACHED observation of how
doubt manifests itself in the inner universe of the practitioner.
It is
noted that both attitudes primarily AVOID ENGAGEMENT and IDENTIFICATION of the
subject with his doubt.
The
practitioner is in reality the SPIRIT, the SELF, and is not identical with his
thoughts or doubt.
An
intelligent practitioner realizes that DOUBT APPEARS TO HIM , it
comes from outside, so HE IS NOT IDENTICAL to his DOUBT.
When the
practitioner identifies with the doubt that arises, a conflict arises within
him that divides and undermines him within.
By
fighting his own doubt - as the MISA guide foolishly suggests - the
practitioner is fighting with himself, defeat being very likely.
Besides,
Bivolaru always said that "what you fear, that's why you don't
escape" but here he is, once again, contradicting himself.
In
reality, the fear of doubt fuels and amplifies it because the subject is
constantly thinking about it.
The 17
Unsuspected Dangers of Demonic Doubts - a special message from GRIEG:
The demonic doubts that we first accept and then begin to feed
unconsciously, causing them to grow, after that they
start to torment us and often make our existence become a sui generis hell
(precisely due to the resonances occult
infernals that it triggers). đ
Demonic doubts then cause us to distrust certain divine revelations or
cause us to reject in an aberrant way and with great vehemence important
spiritual truths. đ
If, from the very beginning, demonic doubts are not accepted, it is no
longer possible for them to ever even have and the least
effect on us. đ
Notice
how much idiocy - and at the same time sectarianism - these passages contain!
That is,
to someone tormented by doubt, Bivolaru advises him not to accept it, to fight
against it!
The respective
being already divided by doubt, will put under the sign of doubt
including the recommendation to reject it, coming from the very one he already
doubts, which will amplify even more the conflict, therefore the
doubt!
This is
how the head of the great tantric and sage Bivolaru leads, to hit his left with
his right.
But
neither Christian prayer nor "tantric lucid and detached observation"
necessarily solves the problem.
If that
doubt is indeed demon-induced - which means it is false and aims to divert the
aspirant from a right path - then it will disappear after a while both through
prayer and through careful and detached observation, which will cause the
sublimation and disappearance of that low impulsive energy.
But if the doubt is justified , that is, it is produced by
a REAL CONTRADICTION between word and deed or between words and
reality? In this case the conflict has real bases and it will not
disappear even through prayer - because God it will not suppress the truth -
nor by higher awareness, for there manifests a reality that does not dissolve
through observation!
To
counteract the persistence of a justified doubt , which cannot be
rejected, the fox Bivolaru invented another concept:
SPIRITUAL
TESTS .
Bivolaru : Often,
the demonic doubts that the evil influences that we accept cause in our being,
they then draw after them the appearance of
certain spiritual tests or trials, to which we are subjected shortly
afterwards. đ
Bivolaru , message regarding the
leaving of the course by some instructors from BraÈov:
Every human being who sets out on a spiritual path will be faced with
certain spiritual trials.
This is an iron law of spiritual evolution. No one escapes spiritual
trials. Remember in this direction the case of Jesus
Christ who even faced certain spiritual trials that are described in the Bible.
So if even Jesus did not escape spiritual trials, no one ever escapes
them. đ
Note : In the Bible it is clearly
said that God did not put Jesus to the test, but allowed him to be tempted
(Matthew 4:1) đ :
1. Then
Jesus was led by the Spirit into the desert to be tempted by the devil.
God allows temptation to come , because it is something natural and inevitable,
but it is not HE who tempts, but the devil!
This fact
is reinforced in the Sobornic Epistle of the Holy Apostle James
(1:13,14):
13. Let no one say, when he is tempted: I am tempted by God,
because God is not tempted by evil and He
himself tempts no one .
14.
But each one is tempted when he is drawn and
enticed by his own lust . đ
The idea
that God intentionally puts man to the test, therefore tempts him,
appears to be foolish in several respects:
➤ from God's position as Omniscient, the very idea of "test"
or "trial" is nonsense since HE knows the future in advance, with
CERTAINTY and knows the value of man.
➤ to test or try an unprepared man would be an immense wickedness.
Failure
being certain in this case, to subject a man to a test which it
is clear in advance that he will fail is like deliberately pushing
him in the abyss, it is a spiritual crime!
On the
other hand, however, man is endowed with free will and thus, inevitably, ends
up being faced with many moments in which he has a choice of several
possibilities,
Therefore,
when it is stated that "the spiritual test appears as a result of a divine
necessity", it should not be understood in the sense that God He Himself
subjects people to spiritual tests, but that these tests are inherent
in the existence of free will, without being imposed.
"Necessity",
in the sense of "inevitability" comes from the freedom to choose!
Moreover,
the possibilities from which man freely chooses are often opposite.
Opposing
options must necessarily be present, for better or for worse, especially in
moral choices because, otherwise, it would be about predestination or even
programming.
If man
has only "good choices" at his disposal, he has no merit in this,
being like a train that inevitably arrives to the right destination, with no
possibility of getting lost, or being like a well-programmed robot that does
its job perfectly.
If man
only has "bad choices" at his disposal, he has no responsibility,
being forced like a slave.
So,
depending on his free choices, man's existence leads him BY ITSELF
to certain breakthroughs, that is, he tests himself!
Then
after each choice, through the effects - good or bad - that he feels, man
realizes for himself if he made a good choice. Thus he will acquire spiritual
knowledge. God does not intervene unless His help is asked, and obviously only
in Good. Man must be left to choose freely and learn for himself from the tests
that ALONE reaches, this is the only natural way of evolution.
So God
does not subject man to trials from HIS Will, nor is it necessary, because they
arise anyway, from freedom of choice.
But the
situations in which man has to make choices do not always arise naturally, they
can also appear as a result of some interventions intentional, from the
outside. It is obvious the case of "temptations" in which man is
attracted or pushed by other entities, who follow to fulfill certain purposes.
God can
allow man to be tested or tempted under certain conditions.
In this
sense, it is often stated that " God does not give man more than he
can carry ", an idea that has been supported even by Bivolaru in a
conference in February 2023 đ .
Once
again this idea is asserted that God does not subject man to a test that HE
knows in advance that man will fail. God does not even need to put man to the
test, because he knows him perfectly. And then, if God does not tempt or test
from within, then who does?
Obviously,
someone who does not work like God: the devil and his ilk!
Bivolaru , through his acolytes, introduced
an innovation: "the test created by the Spiritual Guide!"
"Often the Spirit Guide himself subjects us to various tests for
which he thinks we are ready." đ
Normally,
"being prepared to undergo the spiritual test" can mean one of the
following possibilities:
➤ " the disciple is prepared for the test " in the sense
that " he will pass it easily or with certainty ",
which in fact does not mean a test or trial, but a formal confirmation or
validation, a certificate.
This kind
of test can have the purpose of confirming and strengthening the disciple's
skills and increasing his self-confidence.
➤ " the time has come for the disciple to be tested ",
that is, the time has come to see if he is ready or able to pass at a higher
stage of training or even evolution, for which, however, they must prove some
strictly necessary attributes or skills (analogous to entrance, degree or
license exams).
In this
case, we cannot speak of validation but of VERIFICATION and, obviously,
the test result is NOT KNOWN IN ADVANCE!
There is
therefore the possibility that the disciple will fail the test, i.e. "it
was time for the disciple to be tested" but the time did not come for him
to move on to the next stage, for which he is not yet ready.
The first
option is excluded if the disciples fail the tests.
So there
remains the second option, VERIFICATION, which implies that the "Spiritual
Guide" DOES NOT KNOW IN ADVANCE the result of the tests to which he
subjects the disciples, because there are cases in which they "fail the
tests", thereby proving that they are unprepared.
But this
option is also excluded, because it is contradictory in itself!
The
statement "The spiritual guide believes that we are ready"
contradicts the fact that the disciples fail some tests!
So, in
both situations, the statement "The spiritual guide believes that we are
ready" is nonsense, from which it follows that The "Guide" has
no way of knowing in advance whether the disciples are ready for the test or
not, so there is always the possibility for them to fail the test without the
"Guide" foreseeing this in advance, which is in logical agreement
with the idea of "free will" of the disciple!
And then,
if the "Guide" has no way of knowing with certainty the result of a
test to which he subjects his disciples, how exactly does he come to
CONSIDER that the disciples are ready for spiritual tests?
It is a
serious question, because it raises the serious issue of a so-called
"spiritual guide" who, WITHOUT KNOWING WHAT WILL BE NEXT, DELIBERATELY
pushes a follower into a CRUCIAL test that they may not be ready for at the
time and irresponsibly causes him to fall!
This is
obviously the case of the so-called "tantric initiations" that the
"guide" Bivolaru "offered" to some MISA/ATMAN students in
Paris.
Two such
former students ("Eva and Nathalie from the podcast "Soulcatcher -
Toxic Tantra" đ ) reported that they left the
ATMAN courses precisely following such shocking experiences they had with
Bivolaru.
The
shenanigans at MISA refer to these shocking events as "complex spiritual
tests":
"The person named Eva had a story about an experience in 2007 and
how she later decided to give up the spiritual path.
She is neither the first nor the last to quit. Spiritual tests are not
inventions for journalists to scoff at.
They are real and occur in the lives of all spiritual seekers. Some pass
them, others don't. When you are offered a lot, the tests are also more
complex..." đ
Those at
MISA failed the test of villainy and duplicity themselves, because they did not
describe at all what these "complex tests" consisted of.
Since,
following these "complex tests", these students left the "yoga
school" or - as the MISA people say - ” abandoned the spiritual path
and thus paved their way to hell ” đ , means that these complex tests
were, in their opinion, CRUCIAL TESTS.
Then,
since these students did not know in advance what was going to happen, they
were invited to a meeting in Paris by the "guide" who only he knew
what he was up to, it is about DELIBERATE CRUCIAL TESTS on the part of the
"guide".
So,
according to MISA, the two students failed the tests for which the
"guide" considered them to be prepared (because he invited
them specifically, without a request from them) but at the same time, according
to MISA, they were not ready , since they fell!
The two
trainees did not request "initiation" - they did not even know the
"guide" - but were invited to meet him (" Do you want to meet
the guru? How do you feel when you think about meeting your guru? ",
it was written in the entry form to the Villa).
This
again raises the question: how did he come to consider that the time
had come for the two women to be "initiated", although in the
end they showed that they were "not ready"?
How did he come to consider that the time has come for
Ashleigh Freckleton or Roxana ChirilÄ to be invited to Paris to be
"initiated", since they refused to take part in such
a thing?
Was the
affirmative answer to the question " do you want to meet the guru"
enough? I quote:
Nathalie : "Do you want to meet
the guru?" Exactly. The only answer that is okay is "YES, of
course!"
Because
if you check "NO", you will be kicked out immediately.
reporter : Is that what you were told?
Nathalie : No, we weren't told that,
but it happened to a girl who was there with me. And that was exactly the
point.
Then
there is the question: "How do you feel when you think about meeting your
guru?"
Things
like this are specified: "so excited, happy, ecstatic", something
like that. Only positive things.
You can't
tick anything negative. Then, you also need to specify the periods of time in
which you would have time to meet with him.
filmmaker : She doesn't really want to
meet the guru, this old man with whom she still has no real connection,
although she already meditated on him and wrote him a letter, but she wants to
enter this Villa. And then?
Nathalie:
Well, I checked "YES".
Is a
simple affirmative answer from the students enough? It can be seen that no,
since some "were not prepared, failing or refusing the test”. In fact, the
"fall" was favored, if not actually caused, by the ambiguity of the
question "do you want to meet the guru?"
This can
be a simple meeting and discussion, but it can also be interpreted in a
biblical sense, as Bivolaru did:
"Adam
knew Eve, his wife, and she conceived and gave birth to a
son" or "I
have two daughters, who have not yet known a man;
I'll take
those out for you, do with them what you want" - said Lot).
It can be
seen that the "divine guide", about whom the Bible Code itself
speaks, interpreted the form in this sense...
The
"Guide" launched the invitation on his initiative and even organized
a system aimed at bringing the women to Paris but, in front of the court from
France threw the responsibility on God, declaring that "the women loved
him at his home after a stage called consecration", that is, God responded
affirmatively to the consecration of "initiation" and therefore
approved it.
This is
the answer given by Bivolaru and his fanatical followers to the previous
question "how does he come to consider that the time has come a spiritual
test for disciples". "God" tells him that it's time, through the
affirmative answer to the consecration of sexual initiation.
The
problem is that first there was the filling of the form and the invitation, and
only at the end was the consecration of the "initiation".
Some will
say: "Maybe he consecrated the invitation together with the action of
bringing them to Paris. Everything Grieg does is divinely integrated"!
But then
how come there are refusals, horrible experiences or even criminal complaints?
Does not God foresee this?
Does God
push women into doing things they don't want to do or even into perdition?
According
to the "spiritual guide" Bivolaru, God - omniscient and knowing the
future with certainty - sent the two women to a test that HE - God - knew
BEFORE they would "fail".
On the
other hand, all the "spiritual guide" Bivolaru quotes Jesus, in his
message about demonic doubts:
"Don't forget that always, without exception, GOD the FATHER does
not want the destruction of the sinner (or the lost), but his correction."
đ
Therefore,
if the "logic of the guide" is followed, through his affirmative
answer to the consecration, God directed the women to a crucial test after
which HE knew they would leave the school and one would even file a complaint,
but how he didn't want
losing
the "wanderers" but correcting them, it turns out that it was better
for them that way!
This is
what happens when you manipulate arguments to get your point across, instead of
relying on the truth: they end up contradicting each other!
If all
arguments were based on truth, there would be no contradictions, because truth
does not cancel itself.
Obviously,
it cannot be a question of an involvement of God, who neither tempts nor
desires the loss of man.
Being
about a cunning and diabolical impostor, these "trials" can
no longer be considered "spiritual tests", but
cunning and perverse games aimed at the subjugation and mind
control of followers , games that can have serious effects
in the
case of people with a fragile psyche or who are emotionally attached to the
"guide".
But those
at MISA believe that Bivolaru's perverse games are "sui-generis"
true, crucial spiritual tests:
Advaitananda's
disciple:
"Spiritual tests that mark our evolution on the path of
self-perfection are inevitable. It is said that even Jesus was not spared by
them, so we are all subject to spiritual tests. The spiritual test appears as a
result of a divine necessity, it is
not just a random situation that we face to prove our level acquired until
then.
The spiritual test is meant to validate a certain inner realization, it
is like an exam after which we obtain a certificate.
If he successfully passes the spiritual test, the disciple ascends to a
higher level of consciousness. The much higher
state than the one before the test is in itself a proof that he passed the
spiritual exam.
If he failed, however, the aspirant faces a state of regression, which
actually marks this very spiritual lag. đ
Worse,
the regression can become a definitive collapse sui-generis, as the
"Guide" itself says:
"If an aspirant fails several important spiritual tests, he also
regresses in his inner universe there are some
changes that have an adverse effect." đ
Some
followers believe that the MISA "guide" cannot even be wrong:
"How would it be possible for me to believe that I can free myself
on this spiritual path, in this school, with Grieg as my teacher , if
He can still be wrong? What assurance could I have that I will be able to
receive from HIM the Grace of Liberation at a given moment?
What trust, as a spiritual being who guides me permanently, could I
still have in Him, if he still makes mistakes?
By a wrong counsel, He might misdirect me, and thus my whole life would
turn in a different direction, even evil, than that which
should come to me, through him, from God." đ
But in
the case of the two trainees whom he called to him and who, following the
shocking experiences, left from the great school "leaving the spiritual
path", and now they are reporting to the police, did he guide
them well?
The same
absolute servant who asked himself before, gives his own answer and concludes:
"I have to tell you that for me the Spiritual Master is God and he
can NEVER make a mistake!
He may be apparently wrong (to SOME !!!), but he does nothing that he is
not aware of, and even if you think he is wrong, he
actually adopts by divine inspiration a certain attitude in order to create
certain reactions in us)." đ
If the
great guide can never err, and therefore he did not err but did deeply,
consciously and righteously of which the victims who consider themselves abused
now accuse him, then why so much trouble with the actions of the authorities in
France?
It means
he knew what he was doing, he took the consequences and that's it! Enough, be
aware! That's how it has to be, it's God's will that the police came, it is
God's will that the "guide" was in France and not in Sweden, where he
had protection! And that's it!
However,
the previous quote hides something serious. It is not only the fact that the
"guide" is considered infallible, but here it is a matter of
manipulation very perverse: when it seems that
the "guide" is wrong, in fact he is not wrong, he does so in order to
cause reactions, it is a spiritual
test!
The
"spiritual test" is a perverse trick designed to sweep spiritual
garbage under the rug and nullify questions and doubts what may arise in the
minds of the followers, thus aiming at the total subjugation of their minds.
In the
case of the two former students who accuse abuse, they did not "fall"
as a result of doubts that appeared to them at a given moment on the
"spiritual path", but precisely as a result of the actions exerted
directly on them by the "spiritual guide".
The
"head of wickedness, the tempting devil" who caused their
"fall" is the very "guide" himself!
That is
why the concept of "spiritual test from the master" was invented :
to hide
the mistakes of the "guide" and to justify all his misdeeds!
Focusing
attention on the case of "tantric initiations offered by Bivolaru in
Paris" is essential not through the prism of the scandal (as the tabloid
press does"), but in that it provides the clearest proof of Bivolaru's
imposture as a "spiritual guide".
If other
games can be formally justified by the idea of "spiritual test",
this case cannot be justified at all because, whatever the possible hypotheses,
intractable contradictions arise:
➤ 1 : " Bivolaru is a perfect spiritual guide, he is one
with God, so he knew in advance what the result would be ",
lead to
the conclusion that he ACTUALLY pushed the trainees into an experience against
their free will and spiritual principles ("forced love, without
love"), as well as in the direction of leaving the spiritual path
(although "God does not want the loss of the sinner"!?), which
obviously contradicts the hypothesis of the "perfect guide" and shows
the pose of the tempting devil.
➤ 2 : " Bivolaru did not know what the result of the test
would be, but he listened to God's Will expressed through the answer affirmative
to consecration" (according to his own statements in court),
would lead to the idea that " God is the culprit ", for HE
would have urged the two women to accept "sexual initiation" against their
will and spiritual principles and would have led them to destruction.
The only
hypothesis without contradictions is:
➤ 3 : " Bivolaru did not know what the result of the
test would be and he acted according to his desire", and the violation
of free will of invited students, of spiritual and criminal laws, are natural
consequences of his irresponsibility.
Knowing
Bivolaru and the MISA people, they would jump up at hearing these
considerations, they would start looking for justifications which would serve
to support their version, and they would throw out examples from various
spiritual traditions, which they would interpret as they saw fit.
đč The biblical example of Job: in the recent conference
broadcast as a result of the events in France and entitled
"The
EXTRAORDINARY GOOD NEWS: Revelatory aspects of immense importance, which are
revealed to us both
through the initiatory modality of the I-Ching system and through the secret
Biblical Code" , it is said, I quote:
"This
book tells the story of the most righteous and faithful man of those times, who
was put to a fundamental test.
God
allows Satan to cause Job much suffering after Satan cunningly claimed that
exemplary devotion of
Job would be due to his happy and prosperous life, and that he would no longer
be capable of such holiness if he were dispossessed of his prosperity
and peace, on the contrary, he could even end up cursing God. The ending
of Job's story is a happy one, he manages to triumph and keep his love
for God and unshakable faith in HIM unshaken.”
So, once
again, God does not subject Job to the test, but allows it, knowing in
advance that he will triumph!
In the
present case, the Bivolaru "guide" triggers - without knowing what
follows - the "test" on some students, who then "failed the
test", leaving him and even turning against him.
đč The example of Babaji , invoked by the servant Muriel
in his letter to Claudiu:
"A
stranger arrives, climbing with difficulty, on the mountain wall, to a holy
gathering where Babaji was. That stranger was not even Babaji's disciple, just a being who had
been looking for him for months.
He asked
him to accept him as a disciple, but Babaji did not answer him. Then the
man pointed to a huge chasm and said:
- Life
has no value for me if I am unworthy of your spiritual teaching.
- Jump,
in that case! Babaji said coldly. I cannot accept you in your current state of
spiritual evolution.
Without
saying a word, the man threw himself into the abyss. Then Babaji sent his
shocked disciples to look for the stranger.
When they
returned with his broken body, the Master then placed his divine hands on the
head of the dead man who opened his eyes and humbly knelt at the feet of the almighty
Guru.
- Now
here you are ready to become my disciple - he told him. đ
In
reality, as can be seen in the original ( đ page
231), the stranger tells Babaji:
" If
you refuse me , I will jump off this mountain. Life is worthless if I
cannot gain Your guidance to the Divine.”
This
completely changes the situation. That stranger unconsciously manifested a
"foreign" attitude of a disciple, which was practically equivalent
with a blackmail by which he forced Babaji's hand, leaving the master no choice
but to refuse, for he could not to accept an individual who displayed such an
attitude and to succumb to such psychological blackmail.
In fact,
Babaji's answer is more like "You just have to jump, I can't
accept you in this way anyway!", thus leaving the individual to choose
for himself and not telling him how to act.
The
"aspirant" had two possibilities: either to refuse to jump, which
automatically disqualified him for not keeping his promise, either jump, in
which case what followed depended on the aspirant's karma and/or Babaji's level
of attainment.
If the
aspirant was a demented suicidal fanatic, the result was death by crushing. If
Babaji was a false master, ditto.
It worked
out well only in the situation where the aspirant deserved resurrection and
acceptance, but Babaji was also a genuine master, capable of granting them.
In the
book it is shown that Babaji would have said to the new disciple: " You
bravely passed a difficult test! ”, to which MISA would jump up:
"See,
well, it's a spiritual test?"
Yes, it
is a spiritual test, but one that the aspirant triggered ALONE.
The
aspirant wanted to meet Babaji, he alone decided to look for him, he found him
and he also put himself in that situation, the initiative was always the
aspirant's alone, he was never invited or pushed into a situation he didn't
want.
Babaji
had not responded at all to his original request, which is deeply significant,
for he had left that one to act.
It is not
a test that the master put the aspirant through, it is a test that the disciple
triggered and Babaji had no other choice than to proceed in the way he did.
If,
making a parallel, the women who ended up being "sexually initiated"
by Bivolaru in Paris had ended up in that situation at their request, with
their effort and at their expense, in full knowledge of the matter, then it
would have been their choice, their request and therefore their responsibility!
But the
invitation came from the "guide" without being asked, they were
attracted and deceived, they did not know that it was a sexual act, they were
transported
by an
organized network subordinate to the "guide", under the conditions
imposed by him (trafficked), so the "guide" is (i)responsible!
đč Abraham's example - God gave Abraham a son, Isaac,
in his old age but, at a certain point, asked him to offer as a sacrifice
(burnt offering) his only offspring. As Abraham was about to perform the
sacrifice, an angel of the Lord stops him. So the test was not carried to the end,
but the intention and therefore the faith of Abraham was tested.
Drawing a
parallel, Bivolaru could have called the women to him, made them understand
that a sexual act "is necessary" but, if he had noticed hesitation
and even repulsion in some of them, he could have said at the last
moment:
"it's
enough, it's enough, through your effort manifested even against what you
feel and want, you passed the test!
Or to
tell them: "considering both your hesitations and the fact that
because a love fusion requires intense love and attraction, at least at
this moment it is not the case of a sexual initiation".
But was
it so? Seeing their hesitation, he said to the women: "Calm down,
relax, surrender!"
To those
who burst into tears, he said: "Yes, you have some problems here and
there. You just took them out and it's better now!", although it was
not better, as one of them testified.
To those
who didn't perform as he wanted, he said: "If you do it like that next
time, you'll be in trouble!"
To those
who refused at the last moment, he said: "Egotic, demonic!"
Adding to
this the whole organized system for bringing in women, including the swimsuit
or nude photo circus for "reading the aura", as well as hiding the
real reason for the invitation, one can say: Bivolaru is not Jehovah, it's
Beelzebub!
Be that
as it may, even if they are "passed with flying colors", the tests
involving a blind faith cannot lead to anything good, but to fanaticism!
đč The example of Milarepa : While he was a
disciple of Marpa, the Tibetan yogi Milarepa was submitted (in fact he
submitted) to certain tests from his master. But Milarepa is the one who came
to Marpa and asked to be initiated, offering himself to him with everything, I
quote:
"I,
Precious Teacher, am a great sinner from the Western Highlands and I have come
here to offer myself to you, body, word and mind.
I beseech
you to give me food, clothing and education and enable me to attain Liberation
in this very life.” ( page
21 đ )
In the
"Trials" chapter that begins on the same page, Milarepa describes the
tests to which HE SUBJECTED willingly and without being forced by anyone,
always knowing why he does this, always aware that he must be tested not only
to receive the teaching, but mostly to burn off his terrible karma as a
murderous black magician.
So it was
entirely Milarepa's initiative and choice, who knew exactly why he had come and
why he had devoted himself totally to the master.
And
Master Marpa confessed that he knew from the beginning that Milarepa was
destined to be his main disciple, what he would achieve The Ultimate Achievement,
so he would successfully pass all the tests he would be subjected to, whatever
they might be:
The lama,
seeing what they were doing, said to himself: <Worthy of praise is this
shyshya (disciple) who, given with all his heart, obeys the commands of his
Guru>; and secretly shed tears of joy, seeing my sincerity and confidence
in him. ( page 26 đ )
Marpa
said that in the dream-vision he had had, his Guru, Naropa, had given me the name
Mila, the Diamond-Standard, from the very beginning).
I was
asked to keep the vows of those who aspire to be Buddha Teachers or
Bodhisattvas (page 36
)
Then,
placing his hand on the top of my head, he said: <My son, I knew, right from
the beginning, that you would be an illustrious shyshya.
The night
before you arrived here, I had a dream that predicted that you would be one of
those who would serve our Cause very effectively.
You are a
shyshya gifted to me by my Guru and Guardian Goddess. All these foretold that
you would be an illustrious shyshya, who will fully assimilate the Spiritual Truths
that I am going to share with you . (page 37)
Compare
with the situation of the trainees, called to Bivolaru without knowing exactly
why, being put in front of them to sign first forms in which it was stipulated
in advance that what was actually going to follow did not happen (that is, they
were going to literally offer their bodies!)
Bivolaru
himself did not know if it was the case that those trainees were
"initiated" sexually, evidence that some refused in advance, and
others felt horrible, left him and even reported him, putting the international
police on his trail.
It is
clear that Bivolaru read too many tantric books and imagined or even dreamed
that he was a great Tibetan master (though he himself had no master and
received no initiation), then believing that he was permitted to do anything,
against free will
of the
disciples, against spiritual principles and against penal laws.
đč Drukpa Kunley's example:
Adinathananda : "I
will next address a general aspect which is, in my opinion, essential for a
deep understanding of a certain inner
process that can help us tremendously when we are subjected to spiritual
trials.
This aspect can be called, for example, "spiritual assumption"
and I will define it very succinctly starting from a concrete example.
This divine way of reacting and openly recognizing our mistakes or the
difficulties we still face - even if we have already reached a high
level of spiritual realization - it should be an example and a constant way of
acting for all of us.
That is precisely why I am convinced that what Grieg is pursuing through
all these public actions has a purifying value and
transformative inestimable - or, at least, difficult for many of us to notice
now, because they have an extremely profound effect which is only beginning to be realized by some." đ
However,
in the story contained in the text highlighted in the previous address, Drukpa
Kunley did not test a disciple, he made observations regarding a master with a
high degree of achievement. So it can't be said that Kunley pushed him,
subconsciously or unconsciously, the master Karmapa in a test that the latter
might have failed.
Kunley's
tests usually targeted people who already had a rich spiritual experience.
Furthermore,
in addition to his shocking manifestations that often constituted spiritual
tests, Kunley each time gave evidence of his spiritual capacities, which were
recognized by those who initially blamed him (original text here đ ).
By
comparison, Bivolaru invited mostly young women to him. Some of them were
trainees for a short time, as the case may be to the Australian Ashleigh
Freckleton who was introduced to Villa's programs after only a few months of
correspondence course!
How many
times have you heard that Bivolaru invites older women with rich life
experience or spiritual experience to him?
In fact,
the very idea of "sexual initiation" means that it must take place
as close to the beginning of sexual life as possible.
In
conclusion, the "great tantric master" Bivolaru subjected to
sexual "initiation" trainees who had no spiritual experience, being
therefore unsuitable for being subjected to spiritual tests, especially from
the "complex" category!
Regarding
the parallel that MISA minions often draw between Bivolaru and Drukpa Kunley,
on Rapcea's blog there is the following article: "Small guide to
identifying a fake tantric master - Gregorian Bivolaru face to face with Drukpa
Kunley" đ
EXAMPLES
of "TESTS"
Bivolaru
retracted erroneous statements he had previously made during conferences about
"Isotopic Labeling" - "Luciferic Service" Easter Vigil from
the Vatican, "Pope Francis Aberrations" - farce from the CaÈavencu
Academy and "Mores and Tempers"
- about
the non-existence of female masonic lodges in Romania, on which occasion he
retracted a bet he had made himself.
The
followers then said that Bivolaru had done this in advance and that these were
spiritual tests meant to weed out those who they don't fully trust him.
In
reality, Bivolaru had to retract the erroneous statements after the idiocies
were pointed out to him on the former ExMisa forum - where former MISA students
wrote, who had already left the courses ("they had already failed the
tests") - or was warned by those from MISA:
Bivolaru : "We
consider it necessary to inform you that it has been brought to our attention
that the article on which the third short conference is totally bogus. Therefore, the editors
from the scandal publication "Academia CaÈavencu" are the ones who
they labeled it and then declared it a
pamphlet. We apologize for this awkward situation, but that article it was passed on to us as such, and it was later brought
to our attention that it was fake news."
Bivolaru : "We
inform you that it is urgently necessary to do our mea culpa and admit that we
did not have access to some recent information, which shows that a masonic lodge for women was already
created in Romania.
We inform you that the said bet is no longer valid at all. Additionally,
I received a message from an aspirant, which reveals to us
about the recruitment of women in the Masonic lodge in Romania."
In fact,
these were not "spiritual tests". If it had really been like that,
Bivolaru would have left the "infidels and crooks" to simmer in the
"venom of their doubt" until they had left the course they did not
deserve and retracted the claims immediately,
at the
next conference, when many "suspects" would have changed their minds
("wow, he frankly admitted his error!")
It is
actually Bivolaru who failed these tests because he was intoxicated with false
information by his idiot followers who send him fakes from embarrassing sites
and groups (without the idiots intending it, proof that the blunders kept
repeating themselves), and the Great Know-it-all was unable to notice that said
information was false.
Bivolaru
was accused of sending Remus LomoÈ to Germany (although he did not want to),
the latter dying on the way in a car accident.
Bivolaru
also indicated to several trainees so-called herbal treatments for serious
diseases, for which the trainees gave up to allopathic treatments or
operations, some of them eventually dying.
They
passed the "test of trust in the spiritual guide" (along with the
border between the worlds), but the "guide" failed the skills test of
a clairvoyant, respectively of a healer.
other
details:
https://exmisa.blogspot.com/2023/08/falsul-maestru-infailibilul.html
PS: Of
course, all that is exposed refers to the important spiritual tests, which
involve choices of crucial importance, which are meant to attest to the moral
and spiritual level.
For the
QUANTITATIVE assessment of some skills or ordinary knowledge, exam or quiz type
tests are natural, for they must assess and quantify concretely whether someone
is fit to move on to the next stage of activity, respectively of learning. In
this case, a failed test is not a mental shock or a moral or spiritual
regression but, on the contrary, it even brings a surplus of knowledge and
experience.
Likewise,
certain life lessons through staged situations (such as those depicted in
martial arts films) can be instructive, if they don't go too far though.
In any
case, they cannot be compared with the "trust test" to which MISA
students invited to the guru are subjected to allow themselves to be
"sexually initiated" - practically trafficked and raped - despite the
hesitations and disgust they experience.
The Venetian Beauty and the Parisian Beast
The "affirmative answer to
consecration" became the justification for all the crap from MISA and from
other aberrations conceived in the shadow of MISA:
https://stirileprotv.ro/stiri/actualitate/fostul-discipol-al-lui-gregorian-bivolaru-isi-trata-femeile-ca-pe-clave-cum-a-ajuns-milionar-din-videochat.html
Victim : I don't understand this...
How do I do 30 hours in 3 days?
MĂźrtz
Eugen : Let's
let God show us! Make a consecration about it!
Victim : Good!
"While
in custody, Bivolaru denied the accusations against him, but said that he was
"endowed with extraordinary gifts" and that he was a "spiritual
leader", a
police source said. After they passed the "consecration" stage, the
women "loved" him at his home, the source reported" đ .
"Even
though God answered in the affirmative to the consecration, so also to the
sexual initiation was divinely integrated" , the guru would say.
He wants
to say that God gave him permission to go "to work".
What
about the female guests, who "loved him at his home", what about them?
He asked them what they felt at the "consecration"?
Here is
what the victim named "Eva" đ reports about her experience:
Eva : Then we sat on the
bed. [...] It tried me to keep talking
and keep the conversation going, just to avoid what could have followed.
filmmaker : Eva remembers exactly how
Bivolaru asks her this one question:
Eva : "If
I want to experience spiritual expansion". And I immediately knew what
that meant, and then I asked very clearly:
"Does this have to happen in order to progress spiritually?"
director : Eva wants to say: "Do
we really have to have sex now? With him?" She remembers that Bivolaru
tried to convince her.
Eva : "Do
you want to experiment? Want to dig deeper into this? Above all, relax and let
go! Let's meditate together."
Then we sat facing each other, he took my hands and we meditated. And
the strangest thing was that they happened again things I
can't explain. [...] I noticed how a sexual desire was triggered, but I can't
tell you what it was and how it
happened. [...] Then, basically, it started with the transition to real
intercourse, [...] with all these awakenings of the chakras through
intercourse.
Therefore,
from Eve's account, it does not follow that she would have achieved the
consecration of the love act. Obviously, we cannot know about Bivolaru what he
did in his meditation (but we can guess...). However, it is known with
certainty what he declared, for the first time on the planet, about the
consecration:
conf . about Consecration
, August 1995 , Costinesti (audio đ 10min:36sec – 12min:46sec):
Bivolaru : It is very important for you, especially when you and
your loved one are on the verge of an intimate love fusion, never lose sight of the fact that this offering of the
fruits of action must necessarily
be offered to God.
There are still beings, even in the senior years and often even among
the instructors, who make mistakes.
Even now they have not understood that, at such a moment, even more so,
they must realize this consecration.
If you are dealing with such beings who have not yet understood the
importance of consecration, no matter what year they are in, no
matter what posture you are in with that one, to stop and not want to
continue that communion any further
that sticks out, even at the risk of upsetting that person and making
him say that you are strange.
Eva had
not yet "understood the importance of consecration" or was she rather
a novice student who had not yet received the consecration technique?
She had
just enrolled in DAtY's Tantra classes and was in Paris in late 2006, 15 years
before Nathalie's trip in Paris in the fall of 2021. However, there was no
problem, as the Great Guru revealed the solution:
conf.
Consecration , 1995
(50min:28sec – 52min:15sec đ ):
Question : In the case of love fusion
with a non-yogic person, is it enough that only the person who practices Yoga
does the consecration?
Bivolaru : Yes,
know that it is sufficient , but
mandatory , even then. And if you happen to be
dealing with a weirder person, who is
so suspicious that she finds it strange that you have to hold hands for 2-3
minutes when you do the consecration,
[...] you do it
for her [...] and you feel that integration, that response of God. If the answer
does not appear, then refrain, that there is
something wrong there. Either that person is sick, or has who knows what kind
of karmic past that makes them satanic and
to influence your aura in a harmful way, God knows what about it, but it is
clear that you should not get involved there.
You stop even if it was something furious, very passionate, discuss
other aspects and see if it's time.
"If
the answer does not appear, then refrain, because there is something wrong
there" : maybe
she does not like the initiation, she considers herself abused
sexually,
calls radio stations and badmouths the guru and his movement, then the German
journalists start to do investigations for some podcast, if the news goes
around the world and again he has to give MISA lies.
"God
knows what's wrong with her" , but it seems that the guru didn't know, since he
couldn't help it, that he was furious and passionate and, despite his own
warnings(!), he took action. The evil watch!
conf.
Consecration , 1995
(37min:15sec – 37min:59sec đ ):
Bivolaru : In the
situation where some actions are not followed by this response, that action is
not accepted by God and then we must not realize it. We just stop, because
something is wrong there.
If God does not accept this gift of ours, it means that something is not
in harmony, either in the being with which we merge, either
at that moment, which can be a bad hour that still generates resonances
in our being.
But in
the end, what's the big deal if you don't consecrate before the
"merger"? The guru himself warns:
conf.
Consecration , 1995
(14min:08sec – 14min:44sec đ ):
Bivolaru : The problem is
very serious, even if you can look at it as a superfluous matter, which can be
easily passed over, because you know that amorous fusions with continence,
even when they are crowned with success, release colossal energies, which - if you have not achieved this consecration of
fruits to God and if you do not achieve liberation in this existence -
you may incarnate 4-5 more times for a single
love fusion to reap its sweet but still binding fruits.
Of
course, Bivolaru being already a great liberator, he cannot be chained by
karma... But even if he should reincarnate 4-5 times, that is, so many lives
full of sexual initiations, what's the problem? The problem would be for the
women next to him, but what does it matter?
Maybe
Bivolaru, being a god, gives them exemption from the law of karma... Or,
simply, he doesn't care!
Instead,
the victim Nathalie clearly specifies that she has achieved the prior
consecration of the fruits of the love act.
Here's
what it says:
Nathalie : This is when we basically
ask God if the act is integrated. I didn't feel like I had a choice. I
just knew that if I said "NO" now, he would say:
"What's
wrong with you? Your demons and everything else and your ego” and blah blah
blah. So I just didn't have the feeling that I was safe and that I could say
"well, NO, the answer is NO!"
I still
remember the moment he took off his bathrobe. And I mean, he's just an old man. And my reaction was,
"wow, it doesn't work", but I put it aside because they were my
demons, I couldn't listen to them.
It is
understood that Nathalie did not have the courage to admit that she did not
receive an affirmative answer, or at least that she did not want to anyway to
engage. But this situation betrays Bivolaru, who stated the following about
such situations, I quote:
conf.
Consecration , 1995
(1h:59min:13sec – 1h:59min:35sec đ ):
Question : It is possible that, before
a love fusion, in the consecration of the fruits of the divine, one of
the lovers will receive an answer, and not the other one?
Bivolaru : It is not possible . At the most, let them both notice that this consecration is not received, the fruits are not
accepted.
new
conference on
Consecration , part 2 , August 2015 (audio đ 43min:16sec –
51min:25sec):
Bivolaru : It
is fundamental, it is essential that the two lovers receive - each
of them - an affirmative answer beforehand
at consecration, and if such an
affirmative answer does not appear, does not come, when God answers by
silence, it is not necessary to
force the grade, it is not necessary to deceive the other.
Do not play with consecration because even if a clear affirmative answer
appeared for one of the two lovers , this does not imply that
he or she who indulges in such an action will be spared the consequences
of that amorous fusion [...] although the human being who has responded to the consecration, will imagine that
she is free to engage in amorous fusion with the other human being
which received no affirmative response to the
consecration at all, such a strange pot will not remain without
traces and then, because the law of
harmony is violated, both will later suffer the karmic
consequences of their love game, and both
as well as the other will have karma.
Don't let yourself be tempted to engage in experiences, even amorous
ones, when it doesn't appear to both of you -
when they are face to face - an affirmative answer as soon as they have
previously achieved the consecration of the fruits of their fusion.
There is
no problem with the "liberated", they are free whatever they do; the
law of karma is only for common dudes...
new
conference on
Consecration, part 2 , response to tickets, August
2015 (audio đ 15min:03sec –
16min:18sec):
Bivolaru : We
want to remind you in a clear, firm and categorical way, if there is
no answer to one of the two lovers at consecration and appears only in the other , refrain from engaging
in such amorous play, for it does not present the divine integration.
The situation is the same in the case of a love fusion in threes, fours,
fives, etc. If one of the participants does not receive response
to the consecration, it is not possible to
achieve that love fusion either in three or in four , etc.
Although
he had previously declared that "it is not possible for one of the
partners to receive an affirmative answer to the consecration of the love act,
and the other does not' , now speak of this situation as possible!
Let's
also note that the mouth speaks without a guru about " love
fusions in threes, fours, fives, etc. ", although at
MISA there is no group sex! (at most, individually...)
Since two
are needed in an act of love, it would be illogical (or perverse) for God to
give approval to one and prohibition to the other!
Since he
moved on to the sexual initiation of the student, Bivolaru considered that he
had received an affirmative answer, therefore implicitly considered that the
student in question received - in her turn - an affirmative answer.
Regarding
this situation, there are the following hypothetical possibilities:
➤ God would have given an affirmative answer to both (but this would mean
disregarding the woman's free will!)
➤ God respected the free will of the woman and did not answer the two,
but the libidinous tantric, driven by his impulses, he disregarded the rule
stated by himself
➤ against her will, fearful of the reaction that could have occurred from
the libidinous side, the student implied that she would have received answered
in the affirmative, and Bivolaru consented - either against what he felt, or he
did not feel, but he agreed
and/or
➤ the method of consecrating the fruits of actions, as indicated by the
Great Esoteric, is "defective" or even false.
However
you put it, there is something wrong with the regulation that followed.
Maybe the
Great Macrocosmic Initiate "integrated her into his immense aura"? It
is not possible, because the Initiate himself said, I quote:
conf.
Consecration part 2 , response to tickets, 2015 ( 16min:18sec –
17min:52sec đ ):
Bivolaru : We would like to specify an aberration that we have heard
and which is a big mistake.
Some who are greedy or some who are greedy to have certain love
experiences want to, so to speak, spread the basil and
then if the consecration does not work out for the other person, he or
she offers himself or herself abnormally and says:
"Come on, it's nothing, I'll do the consecration for you! ” and then after
making the consecration, says triumphantly:
"Come on, now we can get busy, because I did the consecration in
your place and I got an answer, so go to bed!"
This is an obvious aberration and you should never be fooled / tricked
by such nonsense.
On simple
analysis, it turns out that it was like this: she was afraid to say NO and
mimed YES, and he was AVID, so he agreed and, in order to correct the
basilisk, he pretended that he also received an affirmative answer.
conf.
Consecration part 2 , 2015 ( 1h:22min:59 sec –1h:24min:22sec đ ):
Bivolaru : When
in some cases we find that the answer to the consecration does not appear and
we thus discover that God answers us
in silence, it is spontaneously possible to mirror in an empathic, paranormal
way the inner universe of the human
being before us, and on that occasion we shall discover as in a Venetian mirror
what were the causes which made let's
not receive a positive affirmative answer to the prior consecration that was
carried out with a view to a love fusion.
If the
Great Clairvoyant had been a "Venetian mirror" and had
"paranormally mirrored" the one in front of him, he would have known
that she did not want
to be
"mirrored" by him and, in addition, she would have seen that that
unwanted experience was going to make her drop out of the great school.
But as
seen now, the mirror was broken. The Great Paranormal is not a Venetian mirror,
it's a VENICE BUSH! đ
A bush
or, rather, a bush rooted in Paris!
Consecration Ă la Bivolaru - a truly planetary
premiere
The
German podcast Toxic Tantra touched on a sensitive point: how ATMAN trainees
are manipulated and determined to succumb to sexual abuse from the guru of the
organization, against their will at the moment.
One of
the subtle and perverse means used by the abuser is to "transfer" the
decision from the female trainees to the "supreme authority" -
"God" - through a technique exposed and promoted even by the abuser:
"consecrating the fruits of actions to the Divine".
The
necessity of detachment from the fruits of action is revealed by Lord Krishna
in the Bhagavad-Gita. Very briefly:
- action
is inevitable, avoiding action and inertia lead to nothing
- any
action generates effects (the fruits of the action) whose nature depends on the
nature of the action and the nature of the goals pursued
- the
fruits of the action do not refer to the things that appear as a result of its
performance (which are part of the action), but to the GOALS pursued đ
- by
virtue of the Law of Cause and Effect, the one who performs the action bears
its effects, so he is bound to the fruits of the action
- bad
fruits bring suffering to the one who does bad deeds, good fruits bring
pleasure to the one who does good deeds
- even
good fruits bind the one who produces them, through the obligation of
incarnation for their fruition; hence the need to renounce the fruits of
actions or detachment from them (disinterested action)
- the
detached action does not chain the one who acts in this way
- as any
action without a goal has no meaning, giving up the fruits of the action is
done by offering them to the Divine
So far,
all fine and dandy: everything is clear, coherent, logical and fair. The
problems start when it comes to THE MODE by which the fruits of the action are
offered as an offering to the Divine.
Krishna
does not reveal a technique for consecrating the fruits of action, but suggests
that it is a matter of inner attitude throughout the performance of the action,
I quote:
"Abandon
and give all your deeds to the Divine"; "No matter what you do,
do everything detached as an offering to Me.
Thus you
will be freed from the good or bad results that make up the chains of
selfish action”; "Do all your actions detachedly, only for the love of
Me".
Religions
and limited cults understand by "offering" the actual sacrifice:
objects are offered by depositing them in temples or in front of altars
containing representations of deities.
The
animals are killed (SACRIFIED) and then, together with grain, incense or sacred
plants, they are set on fire, hence their smoke he ascends and carries them to
the gods to whom they are offered.
More
evolved religious systems believe - rightly so - that the offering of objects,
plants or animals to the Creator it is nonsense, because they belong to the
Creator anyway, since they are created and permanently sustained by Him.
Man can
offer to the Divine only what actually belongs to him: the fruits of his
actions performed by free choice.
The
Bhagavad-Gita and its commentators suggest đ that the offering of fruits to
the Divine is accomplished by:
-
CHOOSING to do GOOD ACTIONS (pure, Sattvice)
- THE
DETACHMENT of the fruits of the action by the one who commits it, by
RENUNCIATION of these fruits
- THE
MENTAL ATTITUDE OF OFFERING TO THE DIVINE, MAINTAINED FOR THE ENTIRE DURATION
OF THE GOOD ACTION (action performed for the Divine, in the name of the
Divine), certified by the DEDICATION of body and soul on the part of the one
who carry out the action, so that it brings as many and good fruits as
possible, therefore as pleasing to the Divine, attitude called KARMA YOGA -
"instant and permanent yoga of life", "nonaction, state of
Divine instrument", the constant awareness that it is not the doer who
actually acts, but the Divine acts through him - the state of consciousness
that arises after the perfect realization of non-action - centering in SELF,
LIBERATION
Bivolaru,
trickster, "combined" all these ("integral yoga, synthesis of
all syntheses" blah, blah) and produced a ritual technique: vocal or
mental utterance of a fixed formula, followed by the perception or awareness of
the "Divine response".
The great
preacher of the state of spontaneity and authentic living, created a formal and
superficial ritual.
This
little book of Bivolaru is no longer found anywhere, in any of the spiritual
traditions!
The
Master without Masters, but who at the same time claims to come from an
"authentic millennial spiritual line", he came up with something new,
something that is not even mentioned in the Karma Yoga path book!
conference
on Consecration part 1 , 2014 (audio
đ 1h:21min:34sec –
1h:22min:14sec):
"It is essential to remember that for now, in the sphere of planet Earth, it
is for the first time that the mysteries of the
consecration of the fruits of God the Father are revealed in a
simple, practical form, which can be of real use to all human beings."
conf . about Consecration
, August 1995 , CostineÈti (audio đ 1h:14min:31sec –
1h:15min:22sec):
Question : Do we need to say any more
words or thoughts?
Buffalo : Yes.
I told you that we must say the words I said to you, or possibly think them,
and after saying them or we thought
them, let's try to realize if God really receives these fruits of ours.
If this action of ours is accepted and God charges us further to
accomplish it, then we can truly go let's continue to
act. If no answer comes from God, then it is necessary that we do not,
not to act in that direction.
You say
the formula and that's it, it's done! Bivolaru , in the conference
on Consecration in 1995 says:
So, considering that a consecration does not take you more than 4-5
minutes - for very important actions - and more than a
minute for actions that are more secondary, it is worth not losing sight of and
even doing them.
To top it
off, on other occasions, the same Bivolaru showed how difficult karma yoga
really is and, in this sense, he quoted (how else!) according to the masters of
the traditional ways:
Bivolaru : We must never imagine that the perfection and wonderful
achievements that become possible through karma yoga are easy to reach. Even the intellectual understanding of its
rules and their correct application is not an easy thing at all.
Krishna says in the Bhagavad-Gita: "On what is actually detached
action and on what is actually inaction, even the wise are
sometimes perplexed and some are even mistaken. đ
Come on,
it's someone from TartÄÈeÈti who did what even Krishna didn't do: he discovered
a simple method, for beginners!
Where
even the wise give chix, Bivolaru and his ageamii beginners are full of
successes!
Ramakrishna : Totally disinterested
action is otherwise very difficult, especially in our times.
To act
completely detached, without any selfish attachment, is extremely
difficult. đ
It's not
difficult at all: you tell the parrot a fixed formula, you wait for the beasts
to come down from the nest, and that's it! Problem solved!
Swami
Vivekananda notes,
not without some disappointment, that: "He who can act completely
detached for five days or at least five minutes, without any selfish
motive, whatever it may be, without thinking at all of the future, of the sky,
of rewards, of punishments, or to any end of the same kind, he will
become a powerful divine, mental and moral giant in a flash. đ
Don't be
disappointed Viveka, look it's not five days but thirty five years and MISA is
full of mental giants, not to mention moral giants... And though they are not
wise, they understand everything from the first exposure and feel from the
first;
from the
first words, they already have states of divine ecstasy. You only have to say
the formula!
Let's say
that the fixed formula (which must be uttered, before proceeding to the
realization of the action, in the form that was given), it helps to precisely
objectify both the intention of action and the attitude of offering the fruits
of action to a particular deity.
The
problem would not be here.
The
problem is in what Bivolaru "revealed for the first time in the sphere of
the planet": "the answer to the consecration", that is, what is
perceived IMMEDIATELY after the ritual formula is uttered. The answer should be
one of these two possibilities:
- The
divine accepts the fruits of the action - and implicitly approves the action -
indicating this by a clear answer, what is perceived as such by the one who
consecrates the fruits of action
- The
divine does not accept these fruits and implicitly does not approve the action
whose fruits were consecrated to him, a fact signaled by the lack of of
any manifestation and therefore by the lack of any perception on the part
of the one who consecrates.
conf . about Consecration
, August 1995 , CostineÈti (38min:54sec – 41min:06sec đ ):
Question : If we consecrate, can we
consider that the respective action no longer has karmic effects?
Bivolaru : This
statement is real, provided that this consecration is really done and obviously
that it exists this answer from
God. It is not all that we said: "Lord, I give you the fruits of my action
today!"
If after that we do not feel that state of ecstatic communion, that
response of God which is, if you will, like a reaction, then
it cannot be said that we have truly made a consecration and that we will not
be obliged for the fruits of our action to chain us,
that we shall not be obliged, as a result of our action, to be again in
manifestation, in a subsequent incarnation, to eat these fruits
of our action, to receive the consequences of our present action.
It is not all to consecrate, but to feel that our consecration has been
accepted; and this is not an inner voice telling you "Yes,
son, all right," but it is an inner state, an ineffable reaction that
appears clearly and indubitably, as something uplifting,
transfiguring, which deifies us for a few fractions of a second or
even for minutes on end.
In fact,
the method is much more perverse because, although "consulting God"
is carried out immediately before the start of the action, the manipulation
started long before. Here are the stages of "consecration" in
reality:
- even
before the "consecration", it was inoculated in the minds of the
students that all the actions carried out under the auspices of MISA are
"divine".
If anyone
has reservations about these actions, it is - only for him - "demonic
doubts". Thus, the students expect in advance that the answer of the
"divine" to this kind of actions will always appear and be
affirmative.
The
refusal of the "divine" - the lack of response - can occur
"accidentally" only when consecrating the actions that are carried
out on the students' own initiative.
- the
fixed formula is spoken and the answer is awaited
- the
answer in the case of actions "guaranteed" by MISA is always
affirmative and beyond any doubt.
But if
any practitioner seems somehow to have received a negative response to the
consecration, it means that he is not harmoniously integrated, he is the
"black sheep", because the others received an affirmative answer and
this proves that the action is "divinely" integrated.
Or,
worse, under collective pressure, he believes that he actually perceived an
affirmative answer, but he wasn't paying enough attention.
Then,
Bivolaru claims as an absolute manifestation of the Divinity - the approval or
lack of approval of the action on His part - to be perceived " clearly
and indubitably ", unequivocally - by a being with limited, subjective
perceptions.
How indubitable
is " an ineffable state "?
God is
constantly manifesting in mystery (it is the deepest mystery), but limited man
is not at all aware of This, for if he were conscious, his existence would be
radically transformed. That is the problem, that man is not aware, he is not
capable to feel the existence, presence or direct manifestation of God.
But Bivolaru
keeps his own, as if the answer of the Divine is " clear and
indubitable ".
conference
on Consecration , August 1995 , Costinesti
(1h:16min:24sec – 1h:18min:53sec đ ):
Question : If that answer doesn't come or
we don't perceive it?
Bivolaru : No,
it is impossible not to perceive it .
Please don't be fooled here. If God answers, we perceive, we realize.
God has available the means that He has in His
omnipotence to make us understand that He agrees.
If not, nothing at all appears.
But as
soon as he says this, he contradicts himself and suddenly admits that the
answer may not be clear, but in doubt:
conference
on Consecration , August 1995 , CostineÈti
(1h:18min:54sec – 1h:19min:40sec đ ):
Question : Is it possible that although
an action is integrated, we do not perceive the response from the Divine?
Bivolaru : No,
it is impossible. To be sure, if you have any doubts that you did not notify,
do it two more times, after you have
made the first consecration. And if to all these three there is no response, no
high, transfiguring reaction, sublime,
then it is clear that there is no answer and therefore our consecration,
although it was made, God does not accept these fruits that we want to offer him, and therefore he does not
support us, our action is not integrated in God.
" It's impossible, but if you have doubts, to be sure,
repeat again... " To repeat the doubts, to be sure?
How clear
and precise the answer to consecration is, is illustrated by a question from a
student attending the conference:
conf . about Consecration
, August 1995 , CostineÈti (1h:37min:07sec –
1h:39min:41sec đ ):
Question : How can we awaken our ability
to perceive the response to such a consecration?
Bivolaru : Know
that this capacity exists in each of you. I would really like to check now,
about this matter: If there was
someone in this room who, to this exemplification that I made related to this
answer, did he perceive absolutely
nothing in response to this consecration that I made by way of example? Please
raise your hand...
from the
hall : ...
something nebulous!
Bivolaru : That "something
nebulous" is exactly the answer! So
that "nebulous something", if you are always going to perceive it,
that something, when you consecrate,
it means that this is the answer. As you always consecrate, it will appear more
and more clearly.
But that something is exactly the answer. And to be sure, whenever you
consecrate and that nebulous something appears, that
"I don't know what and I don't know how", as Eminescu said, that
mystery will be exactly God's answer.
Somebody else [...]. Well, that state of internalization is that
something! Well this is it! It's internalization, right? But it was concurrent
with that answer, right?
Well, that state of internalization is the answer from the Divine and
each one, according to his possibilities, but something appears.
But not that it's nothing, nothing. When there is nothing, when nothing
appears, no response, then yes. It was something that was special, uplifting.
Was that internalization something special? Calm down! So here, there
was something special, there was nothing equal to make you say "it's
exactly like before, nothing appeared!"
"So
this is the clear and precise answer: that nebulous something, that je ne
sais quoi ! So anyone else? So you felt like shooting winds at the time of
consecration? So it was concurrent, right? So then this is the answer! So one
is calm, the other feels good to draw winds! So each according to his
possibilities. So you can't say there was nothing, nothing!"
But it is
not only the vagueness of perceiving the Divine's response that is problematic.
From the moment the practitioner considers that he has received the consent of
the Divine for the action he has consecrated, he tends to consider that the way
he intends to carry out its action has already been accepted, whatever that
will be ("received a blank check"). Thus, throughout the action, the
practitioner is no longer attentive to how he performs that action, to his
inner attitude, or to moral aspects.
Even if
the answer were genuine and clearly perceived, it is necessary to maintain a
spiritual attitude throughout the action, that it may be fruitful, and that its
fruits may be pure.
An answer
received from the beginning must not make the consecrator act without a
spiritual attitude, mechanically, formal, reluctant, thing done just to be done
and above all not to be diverted by selfish interests, which transforms the
action in an immoral one. Bivolaru himself draws attention to this aspect đ :
Not wanting selfishly and no longer fearing the results of the
completely detached actions that we are going to carry out in quality of
divine instruments; not to be selfishly attached to that action at all
while doing it detachedly; not here during the action and not afterwards
let's not consider ourselves as the author of
the action at all, but the instrument in and through which God manifested
and continues to manifest.
The last three points, if misunderstood or misunderstood, can easily
lead to total SELFISH disinterest in the action itself
that we will then perform superficially, in a hurry, "it doesn't matter
how" because now we are no longer responsible.
Or, this is the exact opposite of what the practice of karma yoga
actually is. Karma yoga actually imposes on the one who practices it a
much increased responsibility. And this is evident in two directions:
– The difficult responsibility from which it is impossible for us to
avoid, taking refuge behind a dogma or a law, to always choose
from all the possibilities that present themselves the one that best meets our
ideal the highest, divine, of the
moment;
- The obligation to execute, although completely detached, the action,
whatever it may be, with all the mastery of which we are capable.
This implies that, between the moments devoted to visible detached
action, it is necessary to intersperse moments of reflection, of
consecration to the divine and of rest necessary to fulfill these two
conditions as best as possible.
Bivolaru
draws attention to the lack of responsibility in action through selfish
disinterest, but does not mention anything about the other possibility: the
petty selfish interest hidden behind the "blank check"
given by the Divine, manifested through the attitude often found at MISA and
expressed by the saying "the end justifies the means": "by lying
to the truth, by manipulation for a good cause,
through
the rascals to the goal!”
For
example, to support, argue and justify the attitudes promoted within the
movement, propaganda and manipulation are used, fake news is widely used.
MISA's
stances and outward manifestations are hypocritical and lying, inconvenient
truths are denied and hidden.
For
example, before the broadcasting of propaganda and manipulation conferences,
the "consecration" is carried out.
All this
contradicts the attitude required by the spiritual tradition: total dedication,
from the heart, continuous vigilance regarding the moral purity of the
intentions and the way of carrying out the action, for its ENTIRE DURATION,
until the end.
Because
the practitioner in the traditional spirit does not seek an affirmative answer
from the beginning for the whole action, he does not consider from the
beginning
that the
Divine will accept whatever way the action is performed and whatever fruits
will result, he will be attentive and considerate throughout it ,
to preserve both the fruitfulness of the action and the purity of the
fruits that will result until the end.
Man
retains his free will at all times, therefore it would be necessary to perceive
the consent of the Divine AT ANY TIME during the course of the action, be
permanently an instrument through which God acts.
If he is
not able to do this at the moment, he should at least be aware at every moment
that he is performing an action whose fruits he offered to the Divine in the
beginning, let him be careful not to manifest a tendency to appropriate these
fruits to himself and take care to respect the moral rules during the action.
Instead,
the attitude of MISA is that "the Divine received from the beginning the
fruits as they will be, HE will be satisfied with anything, no matter what, no
matter what", an expression of the Romanian attitude "that's how it
goes; what will come out, that's it, be detached!”
The
danger is when moral deviance occurs, when actions are directed towards the
fulfillment of petty ends.
Thus, under
the cover of the "initial affirmative answer to the consecration",
all kinds of villainy are committed at MISA.
The MISA
practitioner who "consecrates to the Divine the fruits of his
action", offers only an INTENTION, for he has no way of knowing nor
can it guarantee how the action will play out, whether it will produce fruit
and what kind of fruit will be generated.
Then the
guru comes and says: "You do not know how it will be, but God knows
everything in advance, and since HE has accepted the fruits, it means that
everything will be without error". It is the perfect argument behind which
the attitude "the end justifies the means" can be hidden.
An
"affirmative response to consecration", if it really exists, may mean
that "the intentions are good", but it cannot guarantee that
everything will be perfect until the end. It's like God saying "the
intention is good, do as you wish!", which is equivalent to "The end
justifies the means". Furthermore, man has free will and his attitude can
be fluctuating.
A
well-programmed robot can guarantee flawless action in its entirety, but a
human driven by free will and who can change attitude during the action, cannot
give guarantees. It would mean that free will is suspended, that man becomes a
robot.
The mode
of action "do as you like, because you do good anyway" destroys both
moral sense and common sense, hardens both the mind and the heart.
Let's
compare the MISA philosophy with Christ's teachings: " I want mercy
, but not sacrifice " (Matthew 12:7) or
I was
hungry and you gave Me something to eat; I was thirsty and you gave Me to
drink; I was a stranger and you received Me;
I was
naked and you clothed Me; I was sick and you examined Me;
Then the
righteous will answer Him, saying: Lord, when did I see You hungry and feed
You? Or thirsty and I gave you something to drink?
Or when I
saw You as a stranger and received You, or naked and clothed You?
Or when I
saw You sick or in prison and came to You?
And the
King, answering, will say to them: I tell you the truth, since you did to one
of these brothers of mine, too little, You did it to me .
(Matthew 25:35-40)
In other
words, Jesus - whom Bivolaru calls "our divine model" - says that
actions based on compassion and mercy they are, by their very nature ,
actions performed for God. It does not speak of any formal consecration of the
fruits of action to HIM,
but says
that whatever springs from a pure heart, full of love and compassion, means
fruit offered to Him.
Paraphrasing
a saying of Jesus, what is more pleasing to God:
"Lord,
I consecrate to You the fruits of my meditation for the protection of the
planet Earth" ( by
which I invoke You to do all the work ) or "God help me in my
continuous effort to contribute to the support of this orphanage"?
Those at
MISA invoke all kinds of Divine Attributes in all kinds of programs to support
some goals they pursue, and if these are fulfilled, they declare them as
"a result of the school's actions"!
This
means appropriating the fruits and merits of the actions that God
accomplished and which, the faces, were in the beginning offered to God! They
are like the Pharisees who ate the offerings given to God in the temple.
These are
the results of the practice of consecration at MISA!
The same
happens with "karma yoga". MISA encourages voluntary activities, but
only for the benefit of MISA.
They
exhort and they still appropriate the fruits!
Bivolaru
also stated that the response to consecration lasts a short time and
that the feeling of divine integration of the action what is
perceived during its performance is not consecration:
conf . about Consecration
, August 1995 , Costinesti (1h:59min:40sec –
2h:00min:15sec đ ):
Question : Many times, this responsive
state of divinity comes to me spontaneously, even when I do not perform the
consecration.
Is it
considered consecration?
Buffalo : No.
It is not considered consecration, because consecration is regarded as
consecration only when we offer the
fruits of our action to God and God answers us. That we feel that God is
helping us, I told you before, this
does not mean that we consecrated the fruits of our actions and that God
received them.
That is,
"it doesn't matter that you do good deeds, if you didn't offer them, with
your mouth, before. It is the word and not the deed that counts.
The
important thing is to offer with your mouth and after that you can put your
feet in".
conf . about Consecration
, August 1995 , CostineÈti (2h:00min:52sec –
2h:01min:26sec đ ):
Question : Is it enough to make
consecration and then maintain it through awareness?
Bivolaru : Know
that consecration through awareness cannot be maintained because it, after we
receive the answer, it fades
and even disappears. After that, the integration is manifested again in the
course of the action. There are two distinct aspects.
As you have seen even in this exemplification now, you have noticed that
the answer from the Divine is one and after that the
response that occurs during the action is something else. There are two
distinct aspects.
Of course
they are distinct! Word and deed are always distinct! That's what Jesus said:
And He
said to them: Isaiah prophesied well about you hypocrites, as it is written:
"This
people honors Me with their lips, but their heart is far from Me". (Mark 7:6)
The
problem is not the consecration formula before the action (which includes, in
addition to the attitude of offering, the intention and plan of action), but
the fact that the ACTION and especially the ATTITUDE during its realization
DOES NOT CORRESPOND with what was offered!
"Delivery"
is different than "offer"!
conf . about Consecration
, August 1995 , CostineÈti (1h:32min:38sec – 1h:32min:58sec đ ):
Question : However, with situations, with
spontaneous consecration...
Bivolaru : Spontaneous
consecration situations are crazy. There is no spontaneous
consecration. The consecration is as I have shown you, and so it must
always be done. It is not possible to have spontaneous consecration.
"There
is no attitude as an instrument by which God acts, there are only empty words
about it!" This is the promoter of tantric spontaneity!
conf . about Consecration
, August 1995 , CostineÈti (1h:55min:20sec – 1h:56min:11sec đ ):
Question : In the case of an action that
occurs spontaneously, without us being prepared, can we do the consecration
during the action?
Bivolaru : No,
know that the consecration cannot be done during the action. We must always
make the consecration only before the action.
I told you and I repeat. At most, in such situations, we can quickly
offer the fruits of that action to God, it is all we can do
in case of lightning actions.
But it is always good to beware of these spontaneous actions and to seek
to distinctly consecrate the fruits of those actions to
God, then let's wait for the answer and only then act.
"Avoid
spontaneous actions. Before any step, you stop and say the formula. If you do
it with your heart, it doesn't matter.
What you do with your mouth is the real action! If the grandmother fell into
the water, do not immediately jump into the water, but do the consecration
first, and if you get the answer in the affirmative, only then jump into the
water and bring her body to shore!
If you
saved grandma without first verbally offering the save action, you're loading
up on grandma's karma! If you fell into the water and go to the bottom, when
you see the others standing on the shore and doing the consecration, be
detached!"
"The
formalism is essential, the dead letter is important, the ritual is everything;
spirit and soul must be avoided, they lead to involvement. Detach yourself!”
Saying
fixed formulas and invocations at every step is more like practicing sorcery
and magic. Therefore, it is not surprising that the habitual mentality and
distorted visions are found at MISA.
Bivolaru's
statement before the French court, as if he "engaged" in the sexual
act with the students after the "consecration", perfectly illustrates
the imaginary world in which he lives. From his point of view, what happened at
his "initiations" is something divine.
The
sincere practitioner has only to consecrate the fruits of his action through
the prescribed formula and then proceed to perform the action, but
constantly taking care that the action is as fruitful as possible, its goals
are moral, and his attitude to be that of a divine instrument as pure as
possible, being aware that he remains responsible until the end of the action.
Incidentally,
Bivolaru realized this at some point and, after saying at the beginning that
the initial response to the consecration accomplished before the start of the
action it frees the one who acts from karmic ties, afterwards - after 20 years!
- came and completed specifying that, in the case of actions that last several
days - such as for example Tapas - it is necessary to repeat consecrating the
fruits of the action EVERY DAY, at the beginning of the day or before resuming
the action!
How so?
Doesn't the All-Knowing God know in advance how the action will evolve to its
end? Of course he knows!
The
practitioner is the one who does not know, his attitude is the one that can
change from one moment to the next, because he constantly has complete freedom
of choice. He needs to be constantly aware and evaluate, again and again, his
attitude!
In 2015,
20 years after the first conference with the consecration, Bivolaru comes and
introduces a "new" rule:
conf.
Consecration part 2 , response to tickets, 2015 (06 min:14
sec – 10 min:34 sec đ ):
Bivolaru : We also want to specify that, always without exception,
the consecration of a certain action to which I received a clear, affirmative answer, it lasts exactly
from the moment I completed the respective consecration, for 24 hours and for this it is important to calculate
your 24 hours in advance so that you do not find yourself exceeding be it even by 10 minutes, be it even by 3 hours, etc.
that time interval.
Because it is essential to never lose sight of the fact that the
consecration of the fruits spans only 24 hours.
Therefore it is absurd, it is wrong to imagine that if you have achieved
consecration for a certain Tapas at the beginning, when
you start that Tapas, it implies not doing the consecration at all afterwards,
because it is wrong to make the consecration
once and then every day to perform the Tapas, mistakenly considering that the
consecration which you did it then in
the beginning is enough. It's not like that at all. The consecration of
that Tapas can be done globally at first and
then the said consecration is repeated day by day, before you begin the Tapas.
First of
all, man must be aware and responsible 24 hours a day, not "every 24
hours"!
But
Bivolaru cannot tell followers that they are responsible for their actions and
attitude from moment to moment, because that would make him dust his theory of
consecration and furthermore would make the followers be forced to be more
moral and not just listening robots, swallow and blindly execute the guru's
donuts.
And then
he puts it in with the resumption of the consecration every day, which is the
repetition of a formal, mechanical ritual that becomes more mechanical and more
formal with each repetition, accentuating the soul and spiritual hardening.
At the
1995 conference, Bivolaru declared (audio đ
35min:19sec – 36min:33sec):
"We feel how it enters through the crown and causes our being to be
flooded with this flow of grace, which is the answer that what we I
have offered as fruit, it is accepted by God. This state confirms to us that
this consecration is fruitful and then we are sure that
the action we will do after that is inspired by God, is supported by Him , belongs entirely to Him, we being only the instrument through which God's power is manifested
and God is the one who benefits.
The fruits belong to Him, both those that will follow in an hour and
those that will follow in 5 years, 10 years, 100 years, 200 years, 800
years; all these fruits are wholly His."
In 1995,
Bivolaru was "certain that the action is inspired by God, it is
supported by Him, it belongs entirely to Him".
In 2015,
"God" changed his mind: he receives all the fruits at the beginning
of the action, but he also wants reconfirmations every 24 hours!
Barrage
question for the great spiritually realized and omniscient lord: how is it
possible for God to accept the fruits at the beginning of a Tapas, and after
some weeks of answering affirmatively every day, not to answer one day, which
causes the Tapas to cease to be performed on that day, thus to be stopped
altogether before it is performed?
Knowing
Bivolaru and those from MISA, they would say: "Come on, God won't deny you
the fruits of a Tapas!" And then, if it is certain that he will not refuse
them, why is there a need to repeat the consecration every day? Is it not
enough to consecrate the entire action from the beginning? Apparently not!
God is
not obliged to swallow the continuation of an action that is no longer carried
out with a spiritual attitude, generating miserable fruits.
Even the
guru clarified this, I quote:
the
conference on Consecration , 1995 (audio
đ 1h:25min:01sec –
1h:26min:40sec):
Question : Please tell us about these
cases where we are sure that we have consecrated and are integrated, but it is
not so.
Bivolaru : Know
that this foolish security of ours has nothing to do with true integration.
We can be sure, but let's remember that it is not by chance that they
say: "Man proposes and God disposes".
We cannot
be sure in advance that God will receive whatever we offer him . But to be sure
before we have this answer, it is foolishness and does not save us
from the error of thinking that we are integrated by this offering of the
fruits of our actions
and, in reality, this did not happen.
So,
according to Bivolaru, it is necessary to repeat every day the consecration of
the fruits of actions that last more than 24 hours and one cannot know for
sure, from the beginning, that God will accept the fruits offered each day.
But here
the question returns: does God, being omniscient, not know in advance how the
action will evolve until its end?
This
contradiction shows that the method of consecration, as given by Bivolaru,
cannot be correct and that it is bullshit.
It cannot
be said that God accepts from the beginning the fruits of the action throughout
its duration, however it may be this done and, at the same time, to state that
it is necessary to "reconfirm the confirmation" every 24 hours!
If all
the fruits of the action were accepted from the start by the Divine, it would
mean that the doer of the action would somehow be determined to act perfectly
for the duration of the action - like a perfectly programmed robot - and no
longer has the possibility to change its attitude, that is, his free will is
suspended for the duration of the action.
In
reality, God does not give blank checks, everyone is responsible for the
duration of his action and is not a priori absolved from karma.
Everyone
is obliged to always see to it that their actions are, at every moment,
divinely integrated both in terms of how the action and its goals are
performed, as well as regarding the attitude with which the person who performs
it acts. In this way, the free will of the one acting is respected for the
ENTIRE DURATION of the action.
The idea
of consecrating the fruits of the whole action from the beginning cannot
possibly be valid. There cannot be such a method, but one can speak at most of
an integration of the "moment of the beginning".
Thus one
can understand why Krishna revealed the necessity of consecrating the fruits of
beneficial actions, but did not give a specific method: there can be no
"method"! Bivolaru's claim that the god Krishna revealed the purpose
of the Karma Yoga path thousands of years ago and only after many millennia, he
came - the Great Avatar from DĂąmboviÈa - to show the method, it is
embarrassing.
Just as
there can be no technique of loving, so there can be no technique of being the
instrument of divinity. You either have the state of divine relay or you don't.
If you don't have it, you have to make efforts to acquire it, but it cannot be
the result of a technique, just as being in love cannot be the result of a
technique!
The state
of divine relay is acquired gradually, through practice, and until you acquire
it you must always be attentive and responsible. If the state of divine relay
is maintained from the beginning to the end during an action, only then can it
be said that the doer does not accumulate karma. That is why the Divine
reserves the right to refuse to support another action if this is no longer
fulfilled in an appropriate way.
Being
convinced that the Divine received from the beginning the fruits of the whole
action and that therefore he agrees to its realization, the MISA practitioner
no longer questions the divinely integrated attitude and thus loses the sense
of morality.
Thus it
came to the consecration of all kinds of vile actions, pretending that the consent
of the Divine was received.
For
example, the female students consecrate the fruits of the activities on the
porn video chats, although Bivolaru himself declared (once upon a time) that
"exhibiting private parts for a fee is fornication". So fornication
is consecrated to the One who commanded "Thou shalt not commit
fornication!"
You
realize what was in the mind and soul of practitioners who had done Tapas for
years and consecrated only the fruits of each day, globally, but they had not
known that the fruits of Tapas must be consecrated anew, every day. Yoga taken
out of the belly, a la Bivolaru Marele Eliberat!
That's
how the Great Esoteric gave it to the bar and with the hiatus (article 1 đ , article 2 đ , audio đ ).
Imagine
the following scene from the Last Judgment:
God : My Nectaria, I know that
you have dedicated your whole life to helping orphans and the elderly, I would
like to send you to heaven, but you have a problem! When you were giving
help and care, you were always past midnight, and because of those minutes you
entered the next day you have loaded yourself with all the karma of
those you helped during the day, so I have to send you to hell, that the
rule is the rule, esotericism is more important than close love and,
another time, learn to mind and you should have gone too to my son's
classes, Grig!
The idea
that "the validity of the consecration lasts exactly 24 hours from the
moment of its realization, no more, no less" appears as a Bivolaru
quibble for another reason: the interval of exactly 24 hours has no esoteric
meaning, being about an artificially established time interval, for practical
reasons.
The day represents the time interval
which, being expressed by a whole number of hours (24), is the closest in size
of the actual duration of an astronomical day (sidereal day)
- 23 hours 56 minutes 4 seconds - i.e. the duration of a complete rotation of
the Earth around its axis. The interval of exactly 24 hours is therefore
conventionally chosen, for purely practical reasons, and is expressed in units
- 24
hours x 60 minutes x 60 seconds - which can be measured as such only with the
help of precision mechanical or electronic watches, which were not accessible
in ancient times dating back to the millennial esoteric and spiritual
tradition.
The rule "don't
exceed 24 hours even by ten minutes!" cannot be part of the
traditional millennial teaching, especially since, until recently, people
did not have the possibility to measure time with such precision.
The only
sure landmarks were the rising and setting of the Sun. Otherwise, the time was
ESTIMATED with approximation.
This fact
calls into question the "authenticity" of the Svara system taught by
Bivolaru which, in turn, requires precision electronic clocks and for this
reason it could not be applied in antiquity.
Since it
is Svara Yoga, the duration of a complete cycle is comprised between the
sunrise moments of two consecutive days (solar day), but it is not exactly 24
hours either, since the Sun rises at a different time every day!
The rule
- if there is such a rule from an esoteric point of view - should sound more
like this:
the
consecration of the fruits of an action is valid for the duration of a tattvic
cycle, which is comprised between the rising moments of the Sun from two consecutive days.
Yoga at
MISA/ATMAN is ritualistic and mechanistic, everything is done on the clock at
exact times, with exact magical formulas, with invocations and fixed
incantations, taken as if from the Harry Potter movies (Harry Olaru). Above all
reigns BivOlaru, with his magic wand!
Speaking
of the "magic wand" with which BivOlaru casts spells and "gives
initiations", the consecration problem gets complicated when the action
it is
done in two, obviously it is about "love fusions" and especially
about "tantric initiations". But about these in the next post.
Consecration of joint actions and free will
If the
consecration of the fruits of an individual action raises so many questions,
the more complicated is the consecration the fruits of a joint action, which is
carried out simultaneously by several people.
First,
unison is necessary both in the action itself and its purpose, and in the
response of the Divine to the consecration.
In the
case of an act of love performed as a couple, it takes two, so both must
receive an affirmative answer, it does not make sense that one to receive an
affirmative answer and the other no.
conf.
Consecration , 1995
(1h:59min:13sec – 1h:59min:35sec đ ):
Question : It is possible that,
before a love fusion, in the consecration of the fruits of the divine, one
of the lovers will receive an answer,
and the
other one not, right?
Bivolaru : It is not possible
. At most, both should notice
that this consecration is not received ,
the fruits are not accepted.
new
conference on
Consecration , part 2 , August 2015 (audio đ 43min:16sec –
51min:25sec):
Bivolaru : It is fundamental, it is essential that the two
lovers receive - each of them - an affirmative answer beforehand .
In the
case of the victim named Nathalie whose account appears in the German podcast
Toxic Tantra, she clearly testifies that, in the case of her sexual
"initiation" in Paris by guru Bivolaru, the fruits of the sexual act
were consecrated to the Divine, but she did not want to be sexually initiated
by the guru and, fearing his reaction, avoided telling him this,
which was
interpreted by Bivolaru in the sense that the woman would have received an
affirmative answer to the consecration from the Divine.
Since the
sexual act followed, it follows that Bivolaru would also have received an
affirmative answer because, as he himself claimed, the sexual act can only take
place if both partners receive an affirmative answer .
But the
hypothesis of receiving an affirmative answer to the consecration by Bivolaru
contradicts the account of the German student, which testifies to a negative
answer which, according to Bivolaru's statements in the previous passages, is
not possible.
At this
point, the question arises: is it possible that the woman received an
affirmative answer for sexual initiation, as she leaves to understand
Bivolaru, although she did not want this? In this case, what is
free will?
Nathalie : From my point of view, it's
not a "YES" if I'm too afraid to say "NO".
Obviously
there was no way Nathalie would receive such an affirmative answer to an action
in which she did not want to take part.
And if
she had been led to believe that she had received an affirmative answer even
against her will, then she would not have emphasized on the guru's abuse, but
would rather have asked " why do I feel so miserable, since
God showed me that action is divinely integrated? Did I perceive
wrongly, did I not understand correctly? "
➤ It is possible for God, by an affirmative response
to the consecration of the fruits of an action, to prompt a human being to perform that action
against her will ?
If God's
answer were YES when man would like it to be NO, and therefore man acts against
his desire, if the result of the action does not satisfy the man, then the
DOUBT in him amplifies:
"I
did as God wants, but then why am I not well? Wouldn't it be better if I
did as I wanted?”
In such a
case, the person dissatisfied with the result will tend to blame God.
This way
of acting would not help man to evolve spiritually, but on the contrary, it
would make him move away from HIM.
The
question above can be nuanced:
It is
appropriate to offer to God the fruits of an action that in reality we do not
want to achieve or the necessity of which or even morality do we doubt? Would God
accept the fruits of an action done with laziness or doubt in the soul?
Imagine
you are at a restaurant and the waiter/waitress shoves your plate of food away
with lehamites or even disdain. Or another situation, in which the waiters
practically throw your plate on the table, with an expression on their face
like "it's in your throat!"
Good
appetite!... This is probably what God would feel in the case of consecrating
the fruits of an undesirable or foolish action.
Of
course, there are also actions that are not very desired by the spiritual
aspirant, but which would be for his good, such as austerities (Tapas, fasting,
etc.). But even in this case the same kind of question arises:
God
accepts the fruits of an action and sustains that action if it is done without
aspiration and without reluctance, with the feeling of accomplishing an
unwanted action or even silence?
What
happens if the idea of performing the respective austerities does not come
from the aspirant, but from the "master"?
Even if
such austerities are necessary, are they effective if they are not carried out
willingly?
Would God
gladly accept the fruits of such actions?
God, in
His wisdom, leaves man to choose for himself first, so that he takes
responsibility for his actions so that, by the consequences -
good or bad - that arise, he realizes the nature of his will.
If the
consequences of his actions are good, man will be attracted, stimulated and
encouraged in carrying out such actions.
If the
consequences of his actions are bad, from the sufferings arising from his
wrong actions, man will learn that those actions are bad and will avoid
doing them in the future.
If the
action carried out on his own initiative fails, then man will no longer have
the tendency to blame God for his own failure.
From the
lessons learned as a result of his own experiences, man will be
stimulated to strive to acquire first spiritual
discernment, that is, to become able to distinguish from the
beginning - from the stage of intention - the nature of his actions and thus
choose ALONE, in full knowledge of the cause, what is good, then he will offer
it to God with joy
the
fruits of a beneficial action which he has chosen to perform fully freely and
enthusiastically, and God will sustain him.
It is
essential that man learn by himself, from the consequences of his actions and
be stimulated to choose, of his own free will, the path without suffering.
He will
end up orienting himself - forced by circumstances and not by someone else - to
the actions that bring good fruits, he will choose them by himself and, very
importantly, he will thus understand why he makes that choice.
Through
right choices, man will not only gain the benefits of his good deeds, but also
WISDOM!
This is
the true LIBERATION, not that of telling the man at every step what he
should do, in which case the man would only be an unconscious and blind servant!
WISDOM is
the aptitude or ability to understand the nature of things and actions in creation and therefore to
discern over them.
According
to the Law of Resonance promoted and even trademarked at MISA, every intention
to act connects it the one who intends to the source of the corresponding
energy. Therefore, it becomes necessary for man to come to discern in his heart
whether the manifestation of clear and firm intention is accompanied by a
positive or negative vibration.
Moreover,
Bivolaru always draws attention to the importance of clear and firm intention
in the practice of yoga.
And then
how to consecrate to God the fruits of an action that you are not even sure you
want to do?
So, first
is the choice, then the clear and firm intention, then comes the consecration,
which will establish, through the answer received at the consecration of the
fruits of the action, if the action intended to be carried out is integrated at
that moment.
For these
reasons, neither God nor any genuine spiritual master will urge or
seek to persuade a spiritual aspirant to proceed to perform actions that
the aspirant hesitates to perform.
What
Bivolaru does in the case of the victims' accounts is influence
and manipulation in the sense he wants, but which is against
the desire of his victims. God had no way of approving these sexual acts at
first sight, by answering affirmatively to the consecration,
especially
since the commission of these acts resulted in mental suffering and trauma. How
can suffering be a sign of divine integration?
Bivolaru
would say at this stage: the one who revealed the consecration - Krishna -
urges Arjuna to go to battle against his kinsmen, even if Arjuna is reluctant
or even unwilling to fight.
But
Krishna first proves to Arjuna the righteousness of his fight, which is in
accordance with his Dharma, for he belongs the warrior caste and if he does not
oppose evil, evil would triumph and conquer the world.
So first
Arjuna is rightly convinced of the divine integration of action, then he freely
chooses to fight and offers the fruits of action to Krishna.
But
Bivolaru, on what grounds is he trying to convince the students to accept the
sexual act with him, despite their disgust?
If they
let themselves be raped, will they burn off their karma and experience a huge
spiritual leap? Then where is the jump, if the respective have they suffered,
left with trauma and "left the spiritual path"?
"It's
their ego, it's their demons that oppose their spiritual evolution and make
them fail the spiritual tests!", they will say in chorus both the abuser
and the henchmen. But then why did they hide the true purpose of the trip from
the victims, they promised them in advance
that
everything will be fine and that everything will only be according to their
free will đ ?
➤ Is it helpful for the spiritual aspirant to ask
for approval every step of the way , like an oracle?
If God
would answer man's every question and show him what to do BEFORE he was able to
discern and choose to perform an action, man would become just
like a robot: he would perform the actions perfectly from the
external point of view, but inwardly blind. This is not
liberation, it is slavery.
Unless
the apprentice learns and becomes able to perform each operation to perfection
by himself, he will not become a master.
So God
will first let man choose for himself, learn and become able to feel what is
the right action, then
it will support him in carrying out the correct actions, integrated in the
divine harmony.
More
opinions on this can be read here
https://falseguru.wordpress.com/2014/07/12/consacrarea-ca-metoda-de-indoctrinare/
The ones
exposed so far refer to those situations that every human has the ability to
discriminate and choose..
But in
life there are also choices with terrible implications, in risky situations,
the consequences of which cannot be foreseen by the average person.
In such
situations, an answer from the Divine, who knows the future, would be truly
invaluable.
Genre
Choices: Rejecting the treatment and surgery your doctor advises you to have to
remove the galloping cancer what happened or to opt for the
"treatment" with plants that the "spiritual guide" insists
on?
Hit the
road on your scheduled car trip?
By the way,
if the response or lack of response of the Divine to the consecration of the
fruits of the action indicates whether the action is good to be done,
respectively, it is not good to be carried out, why have there been serious
accidents resulting in casualties at MISA đ ?
How is it
possible that three people with positions in MISA did not correctly perceive,
at the same time, the response to the consecration đ ?
Even in MISA's
reply to Le Monde it says, I quote:
In the message sent by Gregorian Bivolaru, the main idea did not refer
to a possible apology,
but precisely to warn everyone about the need to be extremely careful
and responsible for everything they do and not to
"sleep on one ear" with the naive idea that they are
"chosen" because they are on a spiritual path.
The yoga practitioners of the MISA school know very well that the mentality of an aspirant on
the spiritual path is nowhere near that of being dependent on someone's advice and
approval . Even in the courses of the
first years of yoga, it is written and explained that the aspirant he must become more and more responsible and
autonomous as he matures spiritually , and
attention has an absolutely essential role.
It can be said that the entire yoga practice is oriented towards
awakening a state of being as lucid and conscious as possible at every moment. đ
How are
you not "addicted to approvals", if at every step you ask for an
approving answer?
So those
from MISA, at the head of the Guide, recognize the fact that, regardless of the
response received to the consecration of the fruits of each action, the doer
must remain fully alert and responsible at all times during the performance of
the entire action.
But this
means that it is implicitly recognized that there is always the possibility of
"accidents", even in the conditions in which the Divine consent was
received (since the action was taken).
This
leads to the idea that, ultimately, God would have prompted some to perform
actions that caused them to suffer because, if he had not received an
affirmative answer, he would not have carried out the said action with dire
consequences!
This is
where Bivolaru's "logic" leads: the karma yoga practitioner is no
longer karmically responsible for the consequences of his actions the fruits of
which he has successfully consecrated, but still bears the consequences of the
actions!
Another
problem with the method of consecration presented by Bivolaru is that the
response of the Divine is subtle and not exactly easy to perceive.
Why is
this so? Possible explanations:
➤ The divine is the deepest aspect of Creation, a
mystery difficult to fathom and therefore by their very nature, His manifestations are very
subtle
But the
Divine can manifest itself very visibly, as it does in the material world which
is ultimately manifested also by His Will and Power. Why doesn't the Divine
answer us in a way that leaves no doubt?
Why
doesn't the Divine answer as in the Bible, in the form of a pillar of fire,
with a thunderous voice from heaven or even by a hand that appears out of
nowhere and writes a warning on the walls đ ? Bivolaru himself states, I
quote:
conf . about Consecration
, August 1995 , Costinesti (1h:16min:24sec –
1h:18min:53sec đ ):
Question : If that answer doesn't come or
we don't perceive it?
Bivolaru : No, it is impossible not to perceive it . Please don't be fooled here. If God answers, we
perceive, we realize.
God has available the means that He has in His omnipotence to make us
understand that He agrees. If not, nothing at all appears.
But even
within that conference, there were some who declared that they did not feel
anything extraordinary, but calmness, internalization, "something
nebulous" (see previous post).
The only
natural answer is that although God can manifest himself very visibly, HE
chooses to manifest himself in a subtle way so that, on the one hand, it
leaves man the freedom to choose, and on the other hand, it stimulates man to
make efforts to reach that spiritual height where the divine
manifestations become very clear, but in addition the Will
of God may be fully understood!
What
would happen if God constantly manifested His Will visibly and to the
spiritually blind?
✦ some would be shocked and scared (when the Divine
manifests himself in the Bible, HE often starts like this: "Fear
not!")
A
"fear of God" would result, which would prevent closeness with love
and dedication to HIM and cause an obedience full of fear, like that of a
tyrant
✦ others would become fanatics and become tyrants
(inquisitors, members of religious tribunals, supreme religious leaders,
religious war-starting fanatics, etc.)
✦ others would become dogmatic, self-righteous, falsely pious
(hypocritical) or full of blind obedience , conformists, would
obey mechanically spiritual precepts, which is of no spiritual use to them.
From all
this it follows that God always manifests himself in a subtly elevated way
so that His Will is known only by those who understand it! By
this, God implicitly respects man's free will!
God does
not manifest imperatively against man's will, in the way "Do what I tell
you and stop being so arrogant, demon that you are, because I know what's best
for you!" thus robbing him of his freedom of choice and turning him into a
slave submissive and blind, without any spiritual benefit to man.
In the
2nd part of the 2015 Consecration conference , Bivolaru says:
"Because of his perfect omniscience, God knows instantly what our
real intentions are when we make up our minds to achieve the
consecration of the fruits of a certain action. Moreover, God always knows
precisely what will be next all the
consequences, all the fruits of our deeds and at the same time God knows how
great is our sincerity and dedication when
we choose to offer Him and Him alone the fruits of that action of ours."
In the
specific case of DAtY student Nathalie, God could not answer her in the
affirmative, urging her to obey to a sexual act towards which she was initially
disgusted, HE knowing this beforehand.
Therefore,
he did not send his acceptance to the abuser either, who acted forced, blinded
and driven by his abject instincts.
➤ sometimes the one who makes the consecration does
not deserve to be answered
In his
2015 conference, in the part containing responses to tickets đ , Bivolaru asks if there is
anyone who never receives response to the consecration, and after that he
receives an anonymous note:
Question : I would like to know why
some beings never get a response to the consecration, even though they do it
correctly.
What I
mean here is that I get no response to any consecration, regardless of the
action they want to take.
Bivolaru : It
is an important question. It is necessary to know that the human beings who are
in this state have not yet knotted themselves the elemental, natural connection with God the Father.
Such human beings have not yet established contact with the Divine in this
life.
In some cases, there are also human beings who, due to the fact that
they have failed one after another in certain important spiritual tests, due
to the fact that they have slipped into demonic states, due to the obvious
regression in which they are, such human beings are those
about which in the fundamental spiritual tradition it is said that, I
quote "God turned his face away from them".
In certain millennial wisdom traditions, such human beings are called
"lost beings".
Therefore,
the confusion between " actions that should not be done " and
" actions that never receive a response " should not be made.
A
"lost being", who does not receive an answer even at the consecration
of the table, must not understand that he must no longer work or even eat more,
as would result if he mechanically followed Bivolaru's confused teachings.
In
addition to the two previously mentioned categories, it must be said that there
is a third "special" category:
"actions
that should never be done, but which are still done, because they say " I receive an
affirmative answer" from the "Divine"!
These
actions include:
-
"the affirmative answer received by the Spiritual Guide" to the
consecration of the "sexual initiations" to which the
"initiated" women I don't really want to take part
- the
"affirmative answer received" by followers or instructors who take
part in immoral or even illegal actions within MISA
-
"the affirmative answer received" by the students who are active on
porn videochats, although the "Spiritual Guide" also declared that
the exposure of private parts for a fee is too fornicating, and the clients of
the respective students masturbate and ejaculate in front of the screen,
violating the principle of sexual continence, preached by Always the Same
"Guide".
Therefore,
the consecration of the fruits of the actions according to the way
"revealed" by Bivolaru, raises big questions.
Although
all spiritual traditions emphasize the necessity of good deeds and constantly
and persistently urge the performance of good deeds, except the Bhagavad-Gita,
no other spiritual tradition mentions the necessity of consecrating the fruits
of good actions!
Moreover,
even the Bhagavad-Gita does not provide a "precise, concrete
technique" for realizing the consecration of the fruits of action!
If God
exhorts man, in all ways, to the performance of good deeds, why does He not
teach him that even good deeds bind him if they do not offer HIM their fruits?
If it is
so important, why is the way to actually accomplish the consecration not
provided?
Maybe
because it is an eminently spiritual act that belongs to the depths of the
spirit, not being appropriate a concrete way what would turn it into a
mechanical action, into a formal ritual?
Bivolaru
himself boasts of this, without realizing that in doing so, he reveals that his
technique does not exist in the spiritual tradition:
conference
on Consecration 2014 part 1 đ :
"It is essential to remember that for now, in the sphere of planet
Earth, it is for the first time that the mysteries of the consecration of the
fruits of God the Father are revealed in a simple, practical
form, which can be of real use to all human beings."
In
addition to the vague, subjective way of validating the allegedly objective
result of applying the method of consecrating the fruits of actions to the
Divine, in addition to the contradictions and ambiguities that have been shown,
practical inadvertences also appear:
the
conference on Consecration - 1995 :
Bivolaru : The
mere activation of Sahashrara is not enough to allow us to say that it is God's
answer, because this response does
not occur only on Sahashrara. It engages all the centers from the navel to the
Muladhara.
That it is not perceived as distinct and equal until Muladhara, that is
something else. But know that it still feels proportional.
That is, we can feel Sahashrara 70%, Ajna 60%, Vishudda 50%, Anahata
40%, Manipura 20%, Swadhistana 10%,
Muladhara 5%, but it feels clear to all. It is like an outpouring of
grace from the crown to the Muladhara.
the
conference on Consecration 2014, part 1:
Bivolaru : When the answer comes, God answers us gradually, but the
experience that appears in us when it pours out in full the second wave, causes a nuanced state to appear that
settles quite quickly in our inner universe, especially at the level of
centres of force, Sahasrara, Ajna chakra, Soma
chakra, Vishuddha chakra, Anahata chakra and, somewhat rarely, Manipura chakra.
This complex response, which is endlessly nuanced, but which presents
certain inimitable constants - we emphasize inimitable - it
is perceived within our being, in the form of the second wave, which circulates
the subtle sublime flows of energies
The Divine Attributes that diffuse in our being and sometimes flood us,
especially at the level of the Sahasrara power centers,
Ajna, Visuddha, Anahata, rarely Manipura.
” The
Revealed Secret of Consecrating the Fruits of Our Actions to God the Father
– Episode 39 (video đ 08min:40sec)
"When our offering is accepted, we perceive the divine response in
the form of an ecstatic and transcendent flow which comes from
somewhere above the head and encompasses us, from top to bottom, our whole
being ".
Up to Muladhara, only up to the level of Manipura, in the whole being!
Undecided "Guide"!
P.S. In
the CostineÈti camp in 2014, Bivolaru launched an "update" of the
consecration in which, before by saying the consecration formula, at least 21
times and a maximum of 27 times the formula " Lord God, have mercy on
me" is said! "
That was
the problem with the formula! Attitude doesn't matter...
The
natural order of the "stages of the consecration technique" revealed
in the planetary premiere by Bivolaru, should have been the following:
-
identifying the goals that need to be met and the action that needs to be
carried out to achieve the necessary results
-
establishing the manner of carrying out the action
-
analysis from a moral and spiritual point of view both of the goals pursued and
of the way of action
- opting
for an action that is both necessary and moral
- the
clear and firm intention to carry out the chosen action on moral principles
- the
consecration of the fruits of the chosen action
-
perceiving the response to consecration
- moving
on to carrying out the action that received an affirmative response from the
Divine, giving up the one that did not receive a response
https://web.archive.org/web/20100822014810/http://www.krishna.go.ro/texte%20spirituale/KARMAYOGA.htm
https://yogaesoteric.net/definirea-sistemului-karma-yoga/
Official
MISA :
https://misa.yoga/consecrarea/
https://misa.yoga/karma-yoga/
https://vindecare-spirituala.ro/consacrarea-fructelor-actiunilor-nostre-benefice-o-modalitate-de-al-simti-pe-dumezeu/
https://yogaesoteric.net/raspunsul-oferit-de-biroul-de-presa-misa-cotidianului-francez-le-monde/
April 28,
2015 - "the new version of consecration"
https://yogaesoteric.net/unele-precisari-importante-cu-privire-la-consacrare/
The buffalo from "Animal Farm"
In
previous posts, I have argued among other things that offering to the Divine
the fruits of an action that is not desired or done wholeheartedly, it is
inconceivable, for the fruits will be of the same nature.
Bivolaru
himself shows what the attitude must be at the moment of consecrating the
fruits to the Divine: spiritual openness, total sincerity.
Bivolaru : In
order to be able to achieve consecration as well as possible, we must develop a
state of total sincerity, because
when we have no pretense and no hiding we can really feel the real answer
which comes from GOD. It is important to
realize that sincerity is a basic condition.
In fact, this sincerity refers to the inner attitude in which we
have no way of hiding something in our hearts towards GOD.
It is an inner attitude, which is often called honesty with one's own being.
In fact, it is our sincerity in relation
to GOD that is perceived as a living presence in our very inner universe.
That is precisely why, having this state, we will be able to give
to GOD from the heart what we will achieve as an action. đ
Bivolaru : Swami Vivekananda pointed out in a very clear way that in
fact karma yoga gives us maximum freedom.
He also adds: "the karma-yogi asks why we need another motive,
other than the love born of freedom."
And this is how he explains it: "It is a difficult aspect to
understand, but with time, you will realize that nothing in the Universe has full
power over you so long as you do not allow that power to be freely exercised
over you.” đ
Let us
illustrate the action motivated by the "love born of freedom" as it
exists at MISA, with an appropriate example:
Conference
on " Evil Deeds of Demons ":
instructor
message : Related
to the 2nd year initiation into the Great Cosmic Kali Power, initiation which
took place on March 27th. First the lessons about the Great Cosmic Power
Kali were heard and taught. On that occasion the 2nd year students asked
various questions and for them everything was fine.
In the
evening of March 27, we did the practical part before the initiation, so that
the students could prepare to be initiated. When we reached the initiation stage and were
preparing for the consecration, a student told me that she did not want to
receive the initiation. I was somewhat surprised, as it was the first
time I had personally heard such a thing. I asked her on that occasion if she
had any particular reason. He replied that she felt no resonance with
the Great Cosmic Powers.
Bivolaru : Here it is necessary to point out the immense imbecility
shown by the student when she made such a statement. It is worth asking, and it is worth asking herself, how
it was possible for her to feel a resonance phenomenon with a cosmic power, before she had the opportunity to
open her being and resort to an appropriate, specific way,
way that makes it possible to gradually discover a phenomenon of subtle
sublime resonance with a certain cosmic power.
In the case of the student, the treacherous play of the demons was
obvious.
Analogously speaking, we may ask: how is it possible for us to reject
savoring honey from a full jar, is it because we
feel no craving, no attraction, no resonance with honey?
But it is obvious to us that we do not have the curiosity to enjoy at
least three spoons of honey, in order to clarify whether for us honey
is or is not something strange that needs to be rejected forever.
In the case of this student's argument, we can see both the insidious
influence of demons and the imbecility of her response.
Here, in this situation, she unconsciously collaborated with the demons
playing in and through her being and launched this opinion -
fundamentally a cretin - that she does not feel any resonance with the
cosmic powers, but she would have had to ask herself, I quote:
"I feel no resonance with any of the great cosmic powers, but what
have I done so far to feel
such a resonance with even one of these cosmic powers?” To such a
question, her honest answer would have been, quote, "Well,
I didn't do anything!" and then she would have had to continue asking
herself, I quote: "Well if I didn't do anything to feel a phenomenon of resonance with at least one of the cosmic
powers, how can I know, more precisely said, how can I cretinously assert
that I feel no resonance with the great cosmic
powers?
Here it becomes possible to discover a terrible vicious circle in which
the student indulges. In her case, she was right IL
Caragiale who, although he was not an initiate, said, I quote, "you can
fight stupidity, but it almost always wins.”
Here it
is necessary to point out the immense imbecility shown by the great
"Spiritual Guide".
In the
MISA courses, the great cosmic powers are not presented in the printed yoga
courses (the 44 in each course year), but in separate printed materials, which
are later handed to the learners.
Even the
introductory materials (Introduction and Fundamental Key) do little more than
say that the great powers there are 10 facets of the Divine and 10 aspects of
the Cosmic Mother, which are then only listed and it is also said that these
they can be contacted by awakening the corresponding focal points in the
inner universe .
Kali is
the first cosmic power, so the student was in first contact with this aspect
related to tantrism (not yoga!).
I quote
" previously the lessons about the Great
Cosmic Power Kali were heard and taught ".
Therefore,
she wouldn't have been able to do anything to feel if she resonated with even
one of the great cosmic powers!
It's a terrible
vicious circle in which the "student moron" is, but not in
her mind, but in the mind of the real moron of this case, who doesn't even know
the curriculum that he himself stole... developed.
Of
course, even she couldn't tell right away whether or not she resonated with the
great cosmic powers, but she had a first opinion on the occasion of the
presentation of the first of these, Kali, whose image can hardly arouse the
desire for communion, especially for a westerner.
According
to the analogy of the great sage descended directly from Caragiale, if we must
first enjoy three spoonfuls from the jar to find out what it contains, what
will be the result if there is poison in the jar?
The
creatures, no matter how hungry, will smell the contents before grabbing
anything that looks like food. It's a kind of instinctive remote analysis that
prevents them from ingesting anything that might be unpleasant or even harmful.
The same
in this case: before receiving the initiation into a new deity, which is not
part of the tradition of these lands, the student heard the presentation of the
cosmic power Kali and probably she did not like what she heard and saw, that if
she liked it she would have wanted to know it.
She would
have been frightened by the traditional description: the black color, the rows
of skulls around the neck, the worship in cemeteries and cremation grounds:
"She
is for now the devouring Death, the merciless killer. Dancing victoriously upon
a corpse, she is terrible and awe-inspiring, with his fierce teeth; a mocking smile always
floats on his lips. Utterly empty and utterly impudent, like Time, The
Black Lady, with her tongue hanging out from complete detachment from the
continuous process of devouring, wears a string of skulls as a necklace."
That was
not on the presentation posters at the opening conference of the yoga class
that made the "imbecile" in question to enroll in MISA's yoga class.
If instead of the attractive young woman undressed, MISA would put the
traditional representation on the posters
of Kali đ , how many "morons and
imbeciles" would still feel "resonance" with such a course and
would enroll?
Speaking
of the "intelligent" Bivolaru, by virtue of his "argument"
from before, it turns out that you can't figure it out if you
resonate with a certain aspect until you come in contact with that
aspect, until you "taste" its content!
But what
about evil forces? First, how can you know in advance that it is evil forces?
Then, is
it advisable to contact them to see what their nature is?
The
problem is that if you make contact with the infernal forces, you can hardly
escape them!
So the
thing with "first taste and then see if you resonate" doesn't work
automatically, because you can get poisoned or burn...
Bivolaru
criticizes the said student for speaking about cosmic powers before having
contact with them, but he starts from the idea that these are eminently
beneficial, a fact that was not obvious to the student either.
Of
course, the know-it-alls at MISA, those who "understand everything"
from the first hearing, will jump up with their clichés: that it is symbolism,
that it should not be interpreted literally, that in fact Kali is not the
goddess of death, but the transforming force of time blah, blah.
But look,
not everyone "gets it", especially since this cosmic power is taught
starting in the middle of year 2, so it's about basically beginner learners and
you can't expect them to have who knows what deep vision of the universe.
In
addition, at the opening conferences of yoga classes it is said that yoga is
not a religion, that those with Christian beliefs they don't have to worry
about being tempted to other religions, but look at a Hindu goddess being
imposed on them in the 2nd year syllabus, which has in India a true religion!
If the
great cosmic power Kali is sublime, then the student's refusal shows that she
was not ready.
This
situation, however, is the consequence of the organization of MISA courses as a
"spiritual school", which - again - is not on the poster.
A program
structured by study years was created, and the students of each year
automatically receive what is provided in the program, without having to worry
beforehand if they are really ready to receive the information provided to
them.
And then
why does Bivolaru get angry and congratulate the said student with sweet words
like "imbecile"?
Who's the
moron: the 2nd grader who should be learning arithmetic or the clumsy teacher
who teaches them integrals?
The fact
that the others did not refuse the initiation is not proof that they are
superior to the respective student from a spiritual point of view, but only
that they swallow unchewed what is put in front of them, proof of their lack of
achievements.
Bivolaru continues:
In the present case, the abysmal stupidity shown by the student reveals,
in parallel, a certain insidious influence of some demons what
acts in and through her being, and you will be able to convince yourself that
it is so and not otherwise from the instructor's account, which follows.
We quote further from the instructor's account:
"I told her that it would be best to do the consecration of the
fruits of that initiation beforehand and then if the answer is clearly
affirmative and positive, to choose to receive the initiation because
God knows what is best for her, and if she does not receive the answer,
then she is entitled not to remain at this initiation. Moreover, I
also reminded the other students of this aspect, namely that, if
they do not receive the answer to the consecration, let them not remain
at that initiation."
Another
smart! As is the master, so is the apprentice: how to consecrate the fruits of
an action that you do not want to carry out?
How would
such a "consecration" sound?
"Lord
God, I give you all the fruits of this action that I don't want to do.
I abhor
this action, but if You like the fruits that will result, receive them as food
that
I throw
it away, because I don't like it."
And what
would an eventual affirmative answer sound like, which would be possible by
virtue of the master's teachings and the clever apprentice's ideas?
"I
know that you are horrified by this action, but I like actions and fruits of
this kind so that, even if you do not like it, I tell you to take this
action, because I know better what is right for you."
Then
where is free will or what is the point of free will?
It is one
thing to ask about the nature of an action that is unclear to you, and another
to ask about an action that you clearly do not like.
These
spiritual tyrants do not understand that people have opinions different from
their own and that they are free to choose what they think.
But by
the way, if the student in question had listened to the clever instructor and
had still achieved the "consecration" against her will, the
consequence would have been, of course, the lack of an affirmative answer from
the Divine, in which case the student would have left the room without
receiving the initiation and she would no longer have been a "demonic
imbecile", but an "obedient student, harmoniously integrated in the
divine spiritual school".
Or, in
this case, both the instructing servant and the all-wise Guide would have
questioned the negative response to the repeated "consecrations" and
would have accused the student of "demonic doubts"...
And the
"demonic doubts" were deeply embedded in the soul of the "imbecile"
because, as will be seen in the following, she had doubts not only about that
initiation, but also about the method of "consecration", the great
revelation in the world premiere of the foreman, which he also refused to make:
Bivolaru : We
stop this testimony of the instructor, to inform you that only now follows the
so-called bomb element of this
Christian argument, which highlights the demonic influences that exist in this
student. I quote the instructor's testimony again:
"She told me that she does not want to do the consecration because she
does not want this initiation. I told her it would be better if she didn't
demonstrate an egotistical and haughty attitude and reflect as
necessary on this choice, on this decision.
She then told me that she had decided not to take this initiation and
added that she was determined to leave the hall."
This is
how MISA trainees are manipulated into not only doing actions against their
will, but also immoral and even illegal actions: by the
"consecration" method! In a previous post I showed the perverse and
treacherous mechanism by which this manipulation is carried out:
➤ even before the "consecration", it was inoculated in the
minds of the students that all the activities within the MISA courses are
"divine":
The
initiation into the great cosmic powers is "a
phenomenon of subtle sublime resonance, it is the honey in the full jar".
If anyone
has reservations about these actions, it is - only for him - "demonic
doubts".
Thus, the
students expect in advance that the answer of the "divine" to this
kind of actions will be affirmative.
➤ the fixed formula is spoken and the answer is awaited
➤ the answer to all course activities should be a priori affirmative,
beyond any doubt,
because
these were declared from the beginning to be "divine".
But if
any practitioner seems somehow to have received a negative response to the
consecration, it means that he is not harmoniously integrated, he is the
"black sheep", he is the "stupid and demonic imbecile"
because, behold, the others have received an affirmative answer and this proves
that the action is "divinely" integrated. I quote again:
"On
that occasion, the students asked various questions and, for them,
everything was fine."
Look, it
wasn't all right for everyone! There were still some who remained in doubt!
➤ if, however, the hesitation persists, insert the plate with " God knows what is best for you ". But
then why did God give free will to man, just so he could ask for permission?
Where is the spiritual discernment?
It was as
if the idea was for man to acquire discernment and become able to distinguish
and choose the best possibility, which turns out to be the very Divine Will,
just as the angels do.
Asking
God at every step, without acquiring an elevated vision, can man ever evolve?
The
answer to this last question can be seen in the level of evolution of those at
MISA who, for anything, send the "Guide" the notes asking him for
advice on everything đ (although the current MISA
spokeswoman falsely denies this đ ).
Bivolaru : This
situation with this student highlights, beyond appearances, the treacherous and
cruel game of the demons that acted in
and through this student's inner universe, causing her to take such a bizarre
attitude, an attitude that showed that this being she does not go by the hand of God, as was suggested to
her, but she goes by her own hand, more precisely she goes by the hand of the
demons who they influenced her in a
cunning way lest she accept this initiation, because by means of this divine
spiritual initiation, the demons that
act in and through her being and thus play their sinister games, would have
been exorcised, would have been cast out and sent away, so to speak, out for a walk to find another poor
human being as a coop to nestle in and stay.
Look
where those who have transcended their egos and conceits sat! If you refuse to
please them, you are egotistical and arrogant.
They "
walk by the hand of God " and therefore, if you don't do as they
say, you are demonic!
This is
how these panarams who believe they are of divine origin consider the students:
some "demon coops", good only to contribute and execute blindly and
without scruples the "divine" wishes of the Parisian
"rooster"!
Bivolaru : We
continue the instructor's account, I quote:
"On that occasion, around that time, another student told me that
she didn't want to receive the initiation either, at which point I told them, I
emphasized that she should think carefully, and if this is her decision, she
should also assume that no one will force her to accept
this initiation if she does not wish, and I added that she is free to
leave the hall."
Bivolaru : This
not accidental situation in which, immediately afterwards, another student from
that group chose to proceed in
the same way, it highlights a bizarre situation of evil, demonic induction that
occurred through those demons that
were operating in and through the being of the first learner, and that
insidious evil influence immediately affected another learner, who was obviously receptive to such demonic influences
and all of which pushed her, impeled her evilly to choose hodoronc-trunk so that she too will not receive
said spiritual initiation. Here it is in this way, that demonic manifestation
what appeared and manifested through a student's
aura had an evil paranormal echo that immediately influenced her for evil
the other student. In this way, the demons have,
so to speak, hit two birds with one
stone.
He who
accepts whatever is thrown at him is an ardent spiritual aspirant and an exemplary
disciple.
If, all
the while, the student decides not to perform the maneuvers of the "right
hand of God",
from the
aspirant full of fervor as she was until a moment before, she suddenly becomes
arrogant, "coop full of demons" and "creepy rabbit".
We are in
the middle of "Animal Farm" đ , where the "recalcitrant
chickens in the coop" have had enough and don't want to do what they want
anymore to the heads of the Farm who, as we know, were pigs served by dogs! In
this case, the Buffalo served by puppies!
Obviously,
the second student was not completely influenced by the demons of the first,
but by her refusal.
If she
had been a "fervent aspirant", full of blind faith in the Farm Chief,
then she would not have shown any refusal or hesitancy, as all the others who
went to the cutting...initiation, without hesitation, did not hesitate.
It is
clear, however, that she also had her reservations and doubts BEFORE the first
student's refusal, but she did not have the courage to manifest them until that
first refusal occurred.
Here you
can see the herd spirit that manifests itself at MISA through the collective
pressure of those around, which pushes some students to do things that, in
fact, they do not want.